CRC funded reports

References

Published in: Restorative justice programs in Australia : a report to the Criminology Research Council
Heather Strang
March 2001

• Alder C & K Polk 1982, 'Diversion and hidden sexism', Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 15 (2):100-108.
• Austin J & B Krisberg 1981, 'Wider, stronger and different nets: the dialectics of criminal justice reform', Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 18 (1):165-196.
• Bargen J 1996, 'Kids, courts, cops and conferencing: a note on perspectives', Australian Journal of Human Rights, 2: 209-228.
• Bargen J (unpublished), 'The Young Offenders Act 1997 (NSW) - a blueprint for restorative organisational reform in juvenile justice in NSW?' A paper presented at the Government Lawyers Conference, Parliament House, Sydney. 4 August 1999.
• Barry M 1993, 'Informal processing: the South Australian experience' in F Gale, N Naffine & J Wundersitz (eds) Juvenile Justice: Debating the Issues. North Ryde, Sydney: Allen & Unwin
• Bazemore G & M Umbreit 1994, Balanced and Restorative Justice: Program Summary: Balanced and Restorative Justice Project, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Washington DC.
• Braithwaite J & K Daly 1994, 'Masculinities, violence and communitarian control', in Just Boys Doing Business, T Newburn & E Stanko (eds), Routledge, London and New York.
• Braithwaite J 1999, 'Restorative justice: assessing optimistic and pessimistic accounts' in M Tonry (ed) Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol 25, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
• Brown M & K Polk 1996, 'Taking fear of crime seriously: the Tasmanian approach to community crime prevention', Crime and Delinquency, vol 42, no 3, pp 398-420.
• Burnside, unpublished, 'Family Decision Making: A Pilot Project by Burnside and DoCS. Evaluation Report - Summary, September 1999.
• Cant R & R Downey 1998, 'Evaluation of the Young Offenders Act 1994,: Evaluation of the Young Offenders Act (1994) and the Juvenile Justice Teams', [Perth], Social Systems and Evaluation.
• Cant R, R Downey & P Marshall n.d., 'Restorative Justice in Action: An Evaluation of Western Australian Juvenile Justice Teams', unpublished.
• Daly K & R Immarigeon 1998, 'The past, present and future of restorative justice: some critical reflections', Contemporary Justice Review, vol 1.
• Daly K, M Venables, M McKenna, L Mumford & J Christie-Johnston 1998, South Australia Juvenile Justice (SAJJ) Research on Conferencing, Technical Report No. 1: Project Overview and Research Instruments. School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Griffith University, Queensland.
• Families, Youth and Community Care, Juvenile Justice Program 1998, A Commentary on the Evaluation of the Queensland Community Conferencing Program, (http://www.families.qld.gov.au/juvenile/evalresp.html)
• Fry D 1997, A Report on Community Justice Programme 'Diversionary Conferencing', Police Trial Alice Springs Region, Northern Territory Police.
• Gale F, B Bailey-Harris & J Wundersitz 1990, Aboriginal Youth and the Criminal Justice System: The Injustice of Justice? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Goodes T 1995, 'Victims and family conferences: juvenile justice in South Australia', Family Conferencing Team, Adelaide.
• Hassall I & G Maxwell 1991, 'The family group conference: a new statutory way of resolving care, protection and justice matters affecting children'. Paper to the conference Ensuring Our Future: the Fabric of Childhood in Australia, Adelaide, May 1991, pp 10-11.
• Hayes H, T Prenzler&R Wortley 1998, Making Amends: Final Evaluation of the Queensland Community Conferencing Pilot, Brisbane: School of Justice Administration, Griffith University.
• Kelly L & E Oxley 1999, 'A dingo in sheep's clothing? The rhetoric of Youth Justice Conferencing and the Indigenous reality', Indigenous Law Bulletin 4(8), 4-8, February.
• LaPrairie C 1995, 'Altering course: new directions in criminal justice and corrections: sentencing circles and family group conferences', Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, Special Issue: Crime, Criminology and Public Policy, December, pp 78-99.
• Markiewicz A 1997a, Juvenile Justice Group Conferencing in Victoria: An Evaluation of a Pilot Program , Melbourne: Children, Young People and Families Research Unit, University of Melbourne.
• Markiewicz A 1997b, Juvenile Justice Group Conferencing in Victoria: An Evaluation of a Pilot Program Phase 2 , Melbourne: Children, Young People and Families Research Unit, University of Melbourne.
• Marshall T & S Merry 1990, Crime and Accountability: Victim/Offender Mediation in Practice, HMSO, London.
• Mason A 2000, 'Restorative justice: courts and civil society' , in H Strang & J Braithwaite (eds) Restorative Justice: Philosophy to Practice, Ashgate, Aldershot.
• McDonald J & D Moore 2001, 'Community conferencing as a special case of conflict transformation' in H Strang & J Braithwaite (eds) Restorative Justice and Civil Society, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• McInnes R & S Hetzel 1996, 'Family conferences in the juvenile justice system of South Australia' Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law 3(2) (www.murdoch.edu.au/elaw/issues/v3n2/mcinnes.html)
• Ministry of Justice [Western Australia] 1994, Juvenile Justice Teams: a Six Month Evaluation, prepared by Neville Jones, Ministry of Justice, Perth.
• Mission of St James and St John 1995, Group Conferencing: Executive Summary, Juvenile Justice Pilot Project on Group Conferencing, Melbourne.
• Naffine N & J Wundersitz 1994, 'Trends in juvenile justice' in D Chappell & P Wilson (eds), The Australian Criminal Justice System in the Mid 1990s, Sydney: Butterworths.
• NSW Department of Community Services, unpublished draft , 'Alternative Dispute Resolution: a DoCS discussion paper', 2000
• Palk G, G Pollard & L Johnson (unpublished), 'Community Conferencing in Queensland', a paper presented to the Australian and New Zealand Society of Criminology Conference, Gold Coast, 8-10 July 1998.
• Palk G, H Hayes & T Prenzler 1998, 'Restorative justice and community conferencing: summary of findings from a pilot study', Current Issues in Criminal Justice 10(2): 138-155.
• Polk K 1993, 'The search for alternatives to coercive justice' in F Gale, N Naffine & J Wundersitz (eds) Juvenile Justice: Debating the Issues. North Ryde, Sydney: Allen&Unwin
• Power P (unpublished), An Evaluation of Community Youth Conferencing in New South Wales: A (Confidential) Report to JW Shaw QC MLC, NSW Attorney General, 1996.
• Reeves H & K Mulley 2000, 'The new status of victims in the UK: opportunities and threats', in A Crawford & J Goodey (eds) Integrating a Victim Perspective within Criminal Justice, Ashgate, Aldershot.
• Sandor, D 1994, 'The thickening blue wedge in juvenile justice', in C Alder & J Wundersitz (eds), Family Conferencing and Juvenile Justice: The Way Forward or Misplaced Optimism?, Australian Studies in Law, Crime and Justice, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.
• Seymour J 1988, Dealing with Juvenile Offenders, North Ryde, Sydney: Law Book Co.
• Sherman L, H Strang, G Barnes, J Braithwaite, N Inkpen and M Teh 1998, Experiments in Restorative Policing: A Progress Report on the Canberra Reintegrative Shaming Experiments, Law Program, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra (www.aic.gov.au/rjustice)
• Sherman L, H Strang and D Woods 2000, Reoffending Patterns in the Canberra Reintegrative Shaming Experiments, Law Program, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra (www.aic.gov.au/rjustice)
• Strang H & J Braithwaite forthcoming, Restorative Justice and Family Violence.
• Strang H, G Barnes, J Braithwaite & L Sherman 1999, Experiments in Restorative Policing: A Progress Report on the Canberra Reintegrative Shaming Experiments (RISE), Law Program, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra (www.aic.gov.au/rjustice).
• Strang H, PhD thesis, Victim Participation in a Restorative Justice Process: The Canberra Reintegrative Shaming Experiments, 2000, unpublished.
• Stuart B 1996, 'Circle sentencing: turning swords into ploughshares' in B Galaway&J Hudson (eds) Restorative Justice: International Perspectives, Criminal Justice Press, Monsey NY.
• Success Works Pty Ltd 1999, Juvenile Justice Group Conferencing Project Evaluation, Success Works Pty Ltd, Melbourne.
• Swain P & P Ban 1997, 'Participation and partnership - family group conferencing in the Australian context', The Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 19 (1): 35-54.
• Swain P and Associates 1993, The Family Decision-Making Programme Implementation Report, prepared for the Mission f St James & ;St John.
• Thorsborne M & L Cameron 2001, 'Restorative justice and school discipline: mutually exclusive?' in H Strang & J Braithwaite (eds) Restorative Justice and Civil Society, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Trimboli L 2000, An Evaluation of the NSW Youth Justice Conferencing Scheme, Sydney: New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, Attorney General's Department.
• Van Ness D 1993, 'New wine in old wineskins: four challenges of restorative justice', Criminal Law Forum, vol 4, pp 251-276.
• Warner K 1994, in C Alder & J Wundersitz Family Conferencing and Juvenile Justice: The Way Forward or Misplaced Optimism?, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.
• Wilkins L 1991, Punishment, Crime and Market Forces, Dartmouth Publishing, Aldershot UK and Brookfield VT.
• Wundersitz J & S Hetzel 1996, 'Family conferencing for young offenders: the South Australian experience', in J Hudson, A Morris, G Maxwell & B Galaway (eds) Family Group Conferences: Perspectives on Policy and Practice, Federation Press and Criminal Justice Press, Sydney.
• Wundersitz J 1996, The South Australian Juvenile Justice System: A Review of its Operation, Office of Crime Statistics, SA Attorney-General's Department, Adelaide.