Australian Institute of Criminology

Skip to content

References

All URLs correct at July 2012

  • Alach Z 2010a. Building on the past: Establishing a centre for lessons learned within a police force. Australasian policing 2(2): 7–9
  • Alach Z 2010b. Policing and effects-based operations: Modelling methamphetamine. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management 33(3): 490–505
  • APMF 2011. New Zealand police, AMCOS performance management framework. Unpublished document
  • APMF 2009. New Zealand police, AMCOS performance management framework. Unpublished document
  • Audit Commission for Local Authorities and the National Health Service in England and Wales 1998a. Local authority performance indicators 1996/97: Police services. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office
  • Audit Commission for Local Authorities and the National Health Service in England and Wales 1998b. The publication of information direction 1998: Performance indicators for the financial year 1999/2000. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
  • Audit Commission for Local Authorities and the National Health Service in England and Wales 1996. Streetwise: Effective police patrol. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office
  • Audit Commission for Local Authorities and the National Health Service in England and Wales 1993. Helping with enquiries: Tackling crime effectively. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office
  • Barrett P 2000. Balancing accountability and efficiency in a more competitive public sector environment. Australian Journal of Public Administration 59(3): 58–71
  • Barton L & Barton H 2011. Challenges, issues, and change: What’s the future for UK policing in the twenty-first century? International Journal of Public Sector Management 24(2): 146–156
  • BERL 2008. New Zealand Drug Harm Index. Wellington: New Zealand Police
  • Bititci U, Mendibil K, Nudurupati S, Garengo P & Turner T 2006. Dynamics of performance measurement and organisational culture. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 26(12): 1325–1350
  • Blumstein A 1999. Measuring what matters in policing, in Langworthy RH (ed), Measuring what matters: Proceedings from the policing research institute meetings. Washington: National Institute of Justice: 5–10. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/170610.pdf
  • Boba R 2003. Problem analysis in policing. Washington DC: Police Foundation
  • Bradley D 2005. Tackling the knowledge deficit in policing: Strategic change versus ad hocery and paint jobs. Paper to Safety, crime, and justice: From data to policy conference, Canberra, 6–7 June. http://www.aic.gov.au/criminal_justice_system/policing/~/media/conferences/2005-abs/bradley.ashx
  • Braga A & Moore M 2003a. The ‘bottom line’ of policing: What citizens should value (and measure!) in police performance. Washington DC: Police Executive Research Forum
  • Braga A & Moore M 2003b. Measuring and improving police performance: The lessons of Compstat and its progeny. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management 26(3): 439–453
  • Bratton W 1999. Great expectations: How higher expectations for police departments can lead to a decrease in crime, in Langworthy RH (ed), Measuring what matters: Proceedings from the policing research institute meetings. Washington: National Institute of Justice: 11–26. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/170610.pdf
  • Butterfield R, Edwards C & Woodall J 2004. The new public management and the UK police service. Public Management Review 6(3): 396–415
  • Canadian Police College Council of Investigative Excellence 2004. Achieving investigative excellence. Unpublished Discussion Paper
  • Carmona S & Gronlund A 2003. Measures vs. actions: The balanced scorecard in Swedish law enforcement. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 23(12): 1475–1496
  • Carter N, Klein R & Day P 1992. How organisations measure success: The use of performance indicators in government. London: Routledge
  • Chavez TD, Pendleton M & Bueerman J (eds) 2005. Knowledge management in policing. Washington DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, US Department of Justice
  • Cockroft T & Beattie I 2009. Shifting cultures: Managerialism and the rise of ‘performance’. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management 32(3): 526–540
  • Collier P 2008. Performativity, management, and governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Collier P 2006. In search of purpose and priorities: Police performance indicators in England and Wales. Public Money and Management 26(3): 165–172
  • Collier P 1998. Operations and accountability: The role of performance indicators, financial devolution and strategy in the management of a police force. International Journal of Police Science and Management 1(1): 81–93
  • Crous C 2010. Conceptualising a performance framework for intelligence led policing. Australasian Policing 2(1): 35–41
  • Dadds V & Scheide T 2000. Police performance and activity measurement. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice no. 180. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/current%20series/tandi/161-180/tandi180.aspx
  • Davies A 2000. Change in the UK police service: The costs and dilemmas of restructured managerial roles and identities. Journal of Change Management 1(1): 41–58
  • Diehl J & Sloan C 2005. Battle damage assessment: The ground truth. Joint Force Quarterly Issue 37. http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/jfq_pubs/1137.pdf
  • Duignan P 2012. Program logic.org. http://programlogic.org/
  • Dupon B 2003. The new face of police governance in Australia. Journal of Australian Studies 27(78): 15–24
  • England and Wales. Home Office 2008. Guidance on statutory performance indicators for policing and community safety 2008/09. London: Home Office
  • England and Wales. Home Office 2005. Police performance assessments 2004/05. London: Home Office
  • England and Wales. Home Office 2004. Building communities, beating crime: A better police service for the 21st century. London: Home Office
  • England and Wales. Home Office Police Standards Unit 2004. Managing police performance: A practical guide to performance management. London: Home Office
  • England and Wales. Home Office 2002. Police Performance Assessment Framework. London: Home Office
  • Flanagan R 2008. The review of policing: Final report. http://www.hmic.gov.uk/media/flanagan-review-of-policing-20080201.pdf
  • Fleming J & Lafferty G 2000. New management techniques and restructuring for accountability in Australian police organisations. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management 23(2): 154–168
  • Flynn N 1986. Performance measurement in public sector services. Policy and Politics 14(3): 389–404
  • Global Security.org. 2011. Chapter 2: Mission Essential Task List ((METL) development. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/army/fm/25-100/chap2.htm
  • Haberman C & King W 2011. The role of research and planning units in law enforcement organizations. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management 34(4): 687–698
  • Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) 1997. ‘Policing with intelligence’. Criminal intelligence—A thematic inspection on good practice. London: HMIC
  • Hoogenboezem J & Hoogenboezem D 2005. Coping with targets: Performance measurement in the Netherlands police. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 54(7): 568–578
  • Hughes G, McLaughlin E & Muncie J 2001. The permanent revolution: New Labour, New Public Management and the modernisation of criminal justice. Criminal Justice 1(3): 301–318
  • Jackson PM 1993. Public service performance evaluation: A strategic perspective. Public Money and Management 13(4): 9–14
  • Kelling G 1999. Measuring what matters: A new way of thinking about crime and public order, in Langworthy RH (ed), Measuring what matters: Proceedings from the policing research institute meetings. Washington: National Institute of Justice: 27–36. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/170610.pdf
  • Lawton A 2005. Public service ethics in a changing world. Futures 37: 231–243
  • Loveday B 2006. Policing performance: The impact of performance measures and targets on police forces in England and Wales. International Journal of Police Science and Management 8(4): 282–293
  • Loveday B 2005. Performance management: Threat or opportunity? Current problems surrounding the application of performance management to public services in England and Wales. The Police Journal 78(2): 97–102
  • Loveday B 1999. The impact of performance culture in criminal justice agencies in England and Wales. International Journal of the Sociology of Law 27: 351–377
  • Lum C 2009. Translating police research into practice. Washington DC: Police Foundation
  • Mackenzie S & Hamilton-Smith N 2011. Measuring police impact on organised crime: Performance management and harm reduction. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management 34(1): 7–30
  • Mazerolle L, Rombouts S & McBroom J 2006. The impact of Operational Performance Reviews on reported crime in Queensland. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice no. 313. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/current%20series/tandi/301-320/tandi313.aspx
  • Metropolitan Police Authority & Metropolitan Police Service 2009. Joint policing London: Annual report 2008/09. London: MPA. http://policeauthority.org/Metropolitan/downloads/publications/annualrep2008-09.pdf
  • National Centre for Policing Excellence (on behalf of the Association of Chief Police Officers) 2005. Guidance on the national intelligence model. Bedford: National Centre for Policing Excellence
  • New South Wales Police Force 2012. Specialist operations. http://www.police.nsw.gov.au/about_us/structure/specialist_operations
  • New Zealand Police 2011. New Zealand Police 2010–11 annual report. Wellington: Minister of Police. http://www.police.govt.nz/sites/default/files/resources/annual/new-zealand-police-annual-report-11.pdf
  • New Zealand Police 2009. Statement of intent 2009/10. Wellington: Minister of Police
  • O’Connor D 2005. Closing the gap: A review of the ‘fitness for purpose’ of the current structure of policing in England & Wales. London: Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary. http://www.hmic.gov.uk/media/closing-the-gap-20050911.pdf
  • Pendleton M 2005. On the threshold of an innovation: Police and the management of knowledge, in Chavez TD, Pendleton M & Bueerman J (eds), Knowledge management in policing. Washington DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, US Department of Justice: 1–32
  • Queensland Police 2011. State crime operations command. http://www.police.qld.gov.au/aboutUs/the_service/structure/scoc
  • Rosenbaum D 2007. Police innovation post 1980: Assessing effectiveness and equity concerns in the information technology era. IPC Review 1: 11–44. http://www.socialsciences.uottawa.ca/ipc/pdf/kr1-rosenbaum.pdf
  • Roy C & Séguin F 2000. The institutionalization of efficiency-based approaches for public service improvement. Public Productivity & Management Review 23(4): 449–468
  • Schick A 1996. The spirit of reform: Managing the New Zealand state sector in a time of change. Wellington: State Services Commission and Treasury
  • Schneider M, Chapman R & Schapiro A 2009. Towards the unification of policing innovations under community policing. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management 32(4): 694–718
  • Schneider S & Hurst C 2008. Obstacles to an integrated, joint forces approach to organized crime enforcement: A Canadian case study. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management 31(3): 359–379
  • Smith P 1995a. On the unintended consequences of publishing performance data in the public sector. International Journal of Public Administration 18(2): 277–310
  • Smith P 1995b. Performance indicators and outcomes in the public sector. Public Money and Management 15(4): 13–16
  • Smith P 1990. The use of performance indicators in the public sector. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) 153(1): 53–72
  • Stone C & Travis J 2011. Toward a new professionalism in policing. New Perspectives in Policing March. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/232359.pdf
  • Tritten J 1997. Joint mission-essential tasks, joint vision 2010, core competencies, and global engagement. Short versus long view. Airpower Journal Fall: 1–39
  • United Kingdom. Public Services Productivity Panel 2000. Improving police performance: A new approach to measuring police efficiency. London: Her Majesty’s Treasury
  • United States Army 2011. United States Army Combined Arms Center—center for army lessons learned. http://acac.army.mil/cac2/call/ll-course.asp
  • van Sluis A, Cachet L & Ringeling A 2008. Results-based agreements for the police in the Netherlands. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management 31(3): 415–434
  • Vickers MH & Kouzmin A 2001. New managerialism and Australian police organisations: A cautionary research note. International Journal of Public Sector Management 14(1): 7–26
  • Vollaard B 2006. Police effectiveness: Measurement and incentives. Santa Monica: RAND
  • Weisburd D & Neyroud P 2011. Police science: Toward a new paradigm. Washington DC: National Institute of Justice
  • Western Australia Police 2011. Annual report 2011. Perth: Western Australia Police. http://www.police.wa.gov.au/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=KEHjAU9IN5E%3d&tabid=935
  • Willis K, Anderson J & Homel P 2011. Measuring the effectiveness of drug law enforcement. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice no. 406. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. http://aic.gov.au/publications/current%20series/tandi/401-420/tandi406.aspx
  • Wisniewski M & Olafsson S 2004. Developing balanced scorecards in local authorities: A comparison of experience. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 53(7): 602–610