Skip to start of content

HomePublicationsReportsAustralian crime : facts and figures2003 → Drug offences and self-reported use

Australian Crime: Facts and Figures 2003

Drug offences and self-reported use

This section is in two parts. The first is based on arrests of consumers (those who are caught in possession of drugs for personal consumption) and providers (including those arrested for drug dealing and trafficking) for illicit drugs in Australia, taken from the Australian Crime Commission's Illicit Drug Report 2001-2002. The second section details trends in illicit drug use based on the 2001 National Drug Strategy Household Survey and the Australian Institute of Criminology's Drug Use Monitoring in Australia (DUMA) Project 2002 Annual Report.

Drugs arrests

The Australian Bureau of Criminal Intelligence reported drug arrest and seizure statistics from 1992-2001. The 2001-2002 Illicit Drug Report was released this year by the Australian Crime Commission (a merger of the Australian Bureau of Criminal Intelligence, National Crime Authority and the Office of Strategic Crime Assessments). This section provides an overview of arrest patterns for offenders between 1995-1996 and 2001-2002.

There is information on arrests for the following types of drugs:

Cannabis arrests include expiation notices, drug infringement notices, and simple cannabis offence notices.

Offenders involved in drug arrests are divided into two categories:

In the case of a person being charged with consumer and provider offences, the provider charge takes precedence and the person is counted only as a provider of that drug.

Illicit drug use

The 2001 National Drug Strategy Household Survey was conducted between July and October 2001. Almost 27,000 Australians aged 14 years and over were surveyed about their experience and knowledge of, and attitudes towards drugs.

This section details:

The AIC's Drug Use Monitoring in Australia (DUMA) program monitors illicit drug use among police detainees in several sites across Australia on a quarterly basis. DUMA provides a reasonable and independent indicator of drugrelated crime within these specific areas. Two methods are used to obtain this information: a questionnaire and a urine sample. As an ongoing monitoring system, it enables law enforcement to track long-term changes in drugs and crime. 2002 was the fourth year of data collection in the DUMA project, and the first year of the second phase of data collection. Funding was provided by the Australian Government Attorney General's Department and South Australian Attorney General's Department.

By 2002 seven sites were being monitored: East Perth in Western Australia, Southport and Brisbane City in Queensland, Bankstown and Parramatta in New South Wales, and Adelaide and Elizabeth in South Australia. Brisbane City, Adelaide City and Elizabeth began participating in 2001.

Data are collected quarterly and presented in the following figures as annual averages.

Facts and figures 2003

Contents