Home
»
Publications
»
Australian studies in law, crime and justice
»
1-20
»
Working girls : prostitutes, their life and social control
»
Chapter 3: The social lives of prostitutes
Working girls : prostitutes, their life and social control
The social lives of prostitutes
Abstract
A sample of Sydney prostitutes is compared with female health workers and female university students, with a view to determining the extent of difference between them, especially in their demographic and class perceptions, their familial and other social relations, and their early sexual experiences.
Introduction
Having examined the social artifacts of morality, scientific theory and the law
as the means of distinguishing prostitutes in society, we will now examine the
evidence for determining the extent of social difference between prostitutes and
other women. In other words, are the moral ideologists, the social theorists
and the legislators justified in singling prostitute women out as a special
female group without reference to the findings from comparative studies of
prostitutes and other women?
A number of studies within the past two decades have arrived at various
conclusions using comparative samples. James and Meyerding ( 1977) compared
their findings on street prostitutes to some general studies of non-prostitute
women and found significant differences in early sexual characteristics. James
and Davis (1982) compared 136 street prostitutes and 133 non-prostitute female
offenders and found the prostitutes with significantly higher drug usage,
juvenile crime records, incomplete pregnancies, early school leaving and broken
natal homelives. Vitaliano et al. (1981) compared 152 prostitutes with 117
female property offenders and found the prostitutes were more often perceived as
"deviants" with a higher ratio of sexual and criminal labels, and possessed
longer records of juvenile offences, as well as earlier departures from their
parental homes. These studies depended on crime statistics and prison
populations for their comparative samples and therefore must be perceived as
possessing a bias towards prostitutes as criminals.
Psychological testing of comparative samples resulted in some diverse findings.
Maiuro et al. (1983) applied the Bem Sex Role Inventory test to determine gender
identification of 101 prostitutes and 78 non-prostitutes, and found the
prostitutes to possess a significantly higher "masculine" orientation. There is
a close resemblance here with the now generally refuted theories of social
Darwinist. Cesare Lombroso (see pp 35-6). Polonsky (1974) used the Tennessee
Self Concept Scale and Thematic Appreciation Test with 2 1 prostitutes and an
equal sample of non-prostitutes, but found no significant differences between
them. Exner et al. (1977) divided a sample of 95 prostitutes into five types,
ranging from "call-girls" to street addicts, and compared each type with
socio-economically matched non-prostitute types. They found no significant
differences between "call girls" and brothel workers and their respective
control groups, while non-addict "streetwalkers" were more immature than their
control group, and street addicts had significantly higher psychopathological
indices than their control group. These results were determined with the
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), Wechsler Adult Intelligence
Scale (WAIS) and Rorschach tests.
Potterat et al. (1984) surveyed 14 prostitute and 15 non--prostitute gonorrhoea
patients for a comparison of social characteristics, and found a differentiation
in only three of 30 standard characteristics: prostitutes were more often the
firstborn; they remained at school longer; they were more often involved in
volatile love relationships. Whilst the samples here were small, enough
evidence exists to demonstrate that findings in empirical studies of prostitutes
are far from corresponding. The psychological tests are not always a true
indication of social differences, and the studies mentioned earlier are far from
a correct assessment of the overall situation of prostitutes in general by their
concentration on street juvenile prostitutes and criminalised women.
Ideally, prostitutes should be matched with similar socio-econimically situated
non-prostitute women, or compared to a large sample of women in general, for
more realistic assessments. However, this is not always practical within a
limited time-frame and with limited financial resources. What I have done,
though, is to take the opposite (and rare) position to most small-scale sampling
of prostitutes with other "deviant" and low-status women controls by comparing a
sample of prostitutes to two samples of traditionally considered high status
women types, professional health-workers and university students.
Health-workers and students provide excellent benchmarks for comparison with
prostitution since they may provide prima facie indices of normality and
diversity in the wider female population, as well as provide a yardstick for
measuring normality and diversity in prostitution.
For this study a random sample of Sydney prostitute women, numbering 128 in all,
was selected as representative of sex workers in general. Although most of them
came from 36 brothels across the Sydney metropolitan area (see Table 3.1), the
experiences of these women in commercial sex were quite diverse and closer to
the distribution of prostitute types and employment location of the general
Sydney sex worker population (see Table 3.2). A questionnaire containing 84
questions was distributed widely in the prostitute population; the sample of 128
prostitutes represents those women who completed and returned the questionnaire.
(See Appendix 1)
Table 3.1 : Distribution of sample of 128 prostitutes in this study
| | % |
| Street prostitutes | 3.9 |
| East Sydney brothel workers | 3.9 |
| Kings Cross parlour workers | 26.6 |
| Suburban parlour workers | 41.4 |
| Escorts only | 8.6 |
| Bondage mistresses | 7.8 |
| Private workers (call girls) | 3.1 |
| Not disclosed | 4.7 |
Table 3.2 : Previous occupations of a sample of 128 prostitutes
| | % |
| Street prostitutes | 11.3 |
| Brothel or parlour prostitution | 38.9 |
| Escort work | 20.8 |
| Bondage and discipline | 2.7 |
| Private prostitution (call girl) | 12.2 |
| Hotel/club/coffee lounge prostitution | 1.8 |
| Never worked in any previous sex industry occupation | 12.2 |
| Note: responses numbered 221 due to multiple past occupations of some women in the sample. Thus percentages above are of 221. |
Of the control groups, 115 health-workers and 120 students took part,
representing those women who completed and returned a modified questionnaire of
58 questions (the questions on sex work in the prostitutes' questionnaire were
deleted, otherwise the questionnaires to all three groups were the same).
Interestingly, 13 of the returned questionnaires of health-workers and students
had to be discarded because the respondents admitted to having worked as
prostitutes in the past. These controls consisted of nurses, doctors and
counsellors from a number of community health centres and hospitals about
Sydney, and behavioural science undergraduates from one of Sydney's major
universities (see Appendix 2 for greater detail on the methodology of this
study).
The following study, then, consists of a comparison between three groups of
women - 128 prostitutes, 115 health-workers, 120 university students - by which
a measure of difference in social conditions and backgrounds between them might
be determined. Since the prostitutes are the focal group, our concern here is
to ascertain to what extent they are differentiated from health-workers and
university students, and, by implication, from the population at large.
Prostitutes in the class system
Before exploring the social indices for determining the social class of
prostitutes, some demographical features of the three samples should be
outlined. Table 3.3 compares ages. The students are slightly younger as a
group than the prostitutes, who are slightly younger than the health-workers.
No inferences may be drawn from this configuration, except that the traditional
view of prostitutes as teenagers and very young women is challenged. The
prostitutes' ages cluster in late adolescence and throughout the 20s;
three-quarters of the sample are between 18 and 30 years, while only a few may
be described as middle adolescents and little more than a fifth are over 30. In
addition, girls of 12 to 16 sometimes also work as prostitutes, but in Sydney
these are a very small minority of all prostitutes and usually confined to the
minority area of the streets.
Marital status in Table 3.4 shows the prostitutes as being more often married
and having higher ratios of marriage breakdowns than the other two groups,
although there exists a pattern between them that is a continuum of married to
single and marriage stability to instability from prostitutes to students. Many
people might be surprised to discover that nearly half of the prostitutes are or
had been married. It indicates that prostitutes are conventional women in their
tendency to aspire to marriage and traditional family life. Since about a fifth
of the prostitutes were married while working, this would indicate an
extraordinary tolerance on the part of their husbands (only a few prostitutes
work without their husband's awareness). On the other hand the relatively high
ratio of marriage dislocations indicates one of two things: the husbands in
these cases found their wives' prostitution unbearable; or, some of these women
turned to prostitution for survival after the breakdown in marriage.
Table 3.3 : Age groups of prostitutes, health-workers, students
| Age group | Prostitutes (n=128) % | Health-workers (n=115) % | Students (n=120) % |
| Under 16 | 00.00 | 00.00 | 00.00 |
| 16-17 | 02.30 | 00.00 | 06.60 |
| 18-20 | 18.80 | 00.90 | 41.60 |
| 21-25 | 35.90 | 22.60 | 16.60 |
| 26-30 | 19.50 | 30.40 | 10.10 |
| 31-35 | 11.70 | 13.10 | 10.80 |
| 36-40 | 09.40 | 17.40 | 11.80 |
| Over 40 | 01.60 | 15.60 | 02.50 |
| Not disclosed | 00.80 | 00.00 | 00.00 |
Table 3.4 : Marital status of prostitutes, health-workers, students
| Marital status | Prostitutes (n=118) % | Health-workers (n=115) % | Students (n=120) % |
| Married once only | 14.10 | 17.40 | 19.10 |
| Second marriage | 05.50 | 06.10 | 02.50 |
| Divorced | 08.60 | 11.03 | 02.50 |
| Separated | 10.90 | 01.70 | 04.10 |
| Deserted | 02.30 | 00.00 | 00.00 |
| Single | 58.60 | 63.50 | 71.80 |
In Table 3.5 the higher ratio of children among the prostitutes is a further
indication of these women's aspirations for conventional family life. The ages
of these children, seen in Table 3.6 show the prostitutes as having more young
children. Since many of these are single mothers, prostitution is an economic
imperative for the children as much as the mothers. Some of the prostitutes'
children are well into their adolescence, which creates another kind of anxiety
in the mothers. As street prostitute Kelly explains:
My oldest son will be 13 this year and I don't want to be at work
much after that. He will soon be at the stage where he will be going out,
venturing into the Cross. I wouldn't like to be working at a time when he is
likely to come into the Cross and spot me on the street.
The prostitutes had their children to men who were not their current husbands or
lovers more often than the health-workers and students (Table 3.7). Rather than
suggestive of promiscuity among prostitutes resulting in pregnancies, it is more
likely that the prostitutes, with higher rates of divorce, separation and
desertion, have sought emotional comfort from men who are prepared to accept
their prostitution and replace the estranged father in these women's family
units.
Table 3.5 : Number of children of prostitutes, health-workers, students
| Number of children | Prostitutes (n=128) % | Health-workers (n=115) % | Students (n=120) % |
| One only | 21.10 | 10.40 | 06.70 |
| Two | 19.50 | 07.80 | 11.60 |
| Three | 04.70 | 04.40 | 04.20 |
| Four | 00.80 | 02.50 | 02.60 |
| No children | 52.30 | 74.80 | 75.00 |
| Not disclosed | 01.60 | 00.00 | 00.00 |
Table 3.6 : Ages of children of prostitutes, health-workers, students
| Age | Prostitutes (n=72)* % | Health-workers (n=38)* % | Students (n=45)* % |
| Under one year | 08.30 | 05.20 | 04.40 |
| 2-5 years | 36.10 | 18.40 | 22.20 |
| 6-10 years | 23.60 | 15.80 | 24.50 |
| 11-15 years | 20.80 | 21.10 | 28.90 |
| 16-20 years | 05.60 | 18.40 | 17.80 |
| Over 20 years | 05.60 | 21.10 | 02.20 |
| * Actual number of children |
Table 3.7 : Current husband/lover of prostitutes, health-workers, students as the natural father of the children
| Where current husband/lover is | Prostitutes (n=56) % | Health-workers (n=29) % | Students (n=26) % |
| the natural father | 30.40 | 61.50 | 75.90 |
| not the natural father | 64.30 | 38.50 | 20.70 |
| the natural father of only some | 05.30 | 00.00 | 03.40 |
Turning now to the social position of prostitutes in the Modern class system it
is important to understand that a historical tradition of prostitutes in Western
societies reflects a two or three-tier structure approximating the social
position of women in mainstream society. Thus, for example, as we have already
noted, in Ancient Greece, the Late Middle Ages and Early Modern Times, there
existed on the one hand slaves and poor women surviving by working in taverns,
on the streets and in brothels, while on the other hand, courtesans plied their
subtle trade in clandestine aristocratic social circles. On the lower level
women from the peasant class entered prostitution for economic survival; but at
the highest level women from the merchant class or the lower aristocrat echelon
aspired to greater power and wealth through lovers at the political pinnacle.
In either case, though, women were aspiring to improve their economic position
by overcoming starvation or increasing their social standing. Though
prostitution may have been one avenue for women to improve their economic
position, it was usually at the expense of lowering their social status as
women, so that while a woman's socioeconomic class might elevate as she acquires
wealth through commercial sex, she attained none of the corresponding class
privileges as her status slid into the "deviant" class or as outcasts.
We had, then, a situation peculiar to women. To obtain wealth and independence,
the criteria for male power, a woman had to trade sex for it and lose social
status at the same time (unless, as in the case of some clever courtesans, she
could disguise her methods). Friedrich Engels, more than 100 years ago,
assessed the situation perfectly when he said:
Prostitution is as much a social institution as all others. It
continues the old sexual freedom for the benefit of men. In reality not only
permitted but assiduously practised by the ruling class, it is denounced only
nominally. Still, in practice, this denunciation strikes by no means the men
who indulge in it, but only the women. These are ostracised and cast out of
society in order to proclaim once more the fundamental law of unconditional male
supremacy over the female sex. (Engels 1978, p. 740).
In his day, though, as early 19th century researchers Parent-Duchatelet and
Sanger fully noted, the vast bulk of prostitutes were working-class women in an
age of industrialisation and meagre employment opportunities. The "ostracism
and casting out" that Engels spoke of also became judicial punishment in the
20th century as an outcome of translating late 19th century puritanism into
criminal law.
The ancient tradition of high "class" whores and lowly harlots survived into the
20th century. Remarking on prostitution in New York, Gail Sheehy commented:
There is probably no vocation which operates with such a fierce
system of social distinctions... [where] the street hooker is at the bottom of
the blue collar end of the ladder... [and] the white collar end of the business
begins with the call girls (Sheehy 1974, pp. 117-19).
She mentions the rivalry that exists, with street prostitutes referring to call
girls as "those lazy flatbackers" and call girls expressing contempt for "street
hookers" for an assumed ignorance and tendency to disease, as a "natural"
division in the industry. Although prostitution was a means of gaining wealth
for a woman a century ago, Sheehy (1974, p. 119) notes that "it is not uncommon
now to find young call girls from wealthy families." Perhaps economic
independence, even if this means less money, is more important to these women
than wealth without personal freedom.
Eileen McLeod (1982, p. 23), in her study of English prostitutes in Birmingham,
notes that "women working on the streets do tend to be women who have fewer
material resources, such as telephones, rooms, flats or homes of their own to
use" than prostitutes in indoor trades. As in New York and Birmingham, in
Sydney it seems to be the case that women from lower socioeconomic families are
more often found working on the streets, whereas women from higher socioeconomic
backgrounds more often gravitate to private prostitution (or call girl), even
though street prostitution is the most lucrative form of commercial sex.
Suburban brothels (or parlours) tend to be much less class specific, in that
they employ local women and reflect the nature of the predominant classes in
their areas of location.
It also seems to be the case that women of middle-class backgrounds are more
sensitive to public exposure and are attracted to the most clandestine
commercial sex in an effort to minimise the chances of discovery. Also, the
ambience, sexual preliminaries and romantic dialogue found in private
prostitution are more appealing to the bourgeois socio-sexual tastes of these
women. On the other hand, women from working-class backgrounds seem to be less
anxious about disclosures and are less inhibited in the more visible forms of
prostitution. This is even more apparent among drug-addicted women, regardless
of their class backgrounds. Working-class women are also less intimidated by
the "hot" or "raw" sex without the trimmings of street prostitution than
middle-class women. These are not hard and fast rules in Sydney prostitution,
and, if anything, the class snobbery in prostitution is in decline as the
traditional class divisions begin to blur with more middle-class women moving
onto the streets and more working-class women establishing their own private
operations.
To determine the class origins of the sample of 128 prostitutes I used four
variables as indices: education; father's occupations original religion; and,
permanent residence. The findings in these variables will indicate to what
extent class diversity exists among prostitutes and how much this might differ
from findings for the health-workers and the students. Table 3.8 compares the
education of all three groups.
Table 3.8 : Education levels of prostitutes, health-workers, students
| Education level | Prostitutes (n=128) % | Health-workers (n=133)* % | Students (n=130)* % |
| Below School Certificate | 34.40 | 01.50 | 00.00 |
| School Certificate | 26.60 | 09.00 | 01.50 |
| Higher School Certificate | 14.10 | 15.00 | 15.40 |
| Matriculation | 07.80 | 14.30 | 58.40 |
| Diploma/Trade Certificate | 13.90 | 33.10 | 18.50 |
| Degree | 03.10 | 27.10 | 06.20 |
| Not disclosed | 00.80 | 00.00 | 00.00 |
| * These numbers indicate more than one level for some participants |
Table 3.9 : Education achievements of women in Australia, 1986
| Education achievement | Number of women | % of female qualifications |
| No school level | 627,797 | 10.36 |
| School level only | 4,029,740 | 66.49 |
| Post-school training | 821,521 | 13.55 |
| Trade certificate | 118,211 | 1.95 |
| Diploma | 230,145 | 3.80 |
| Degree | 233,605 | 3.85 |
| Total | 6,061,019 | 100.00 |
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics 1986, Census figures supplied by Sydney office |
Not surprisingly the prostitutes have not attained as high a level of education
as the other two groups, whose occupations and academic training depend on
higher than average qualifications. However, as Table 3.9 indicates, the
prostitutes' education approximates that of the general population of women.
Some people, who are influenced by the popular culture image of prostitutes as
women of low intelligence, will be surprised to learn so many of the prostitutes
achieved either matriculation standard education, diplomas, trade certificates
or degrees. It is not rare to find university or college students, nurses and
other highly qualified women working as prostitutes to supplement a grant or low
income.
It is still plausible to accept the father's occupation as an index of class for
the family, since people of similar socioeconomic backgrounds tend to marry and
the husband's occupation is regarded as more important than the wife's. In
February 1989, 4,235,200 males were in full-time employment across Australia,
compared to only 1,898,500 females, of whom 1,027,600 were married (Australian
Bureau of Statistics, 1989). In Australia the average weekly male earnings in
August. 1989 was $529.20, compared to that for females at $343.20 (Australian
Bureau of Statistics 1989). Table 3.10 compares fathers' occupations for the
three sample groups.
Table 3.10 : Occupations of fathers of prostitutes, health-workers, students
| Occupation | Prostitutes (n=128) % | Health-workers (n=117)* % | Students (n=120) % |
| Managing director | 04.70 | 04.30 | 10.10 |
| Executive position | 08.60 | 12.00 | 09.20 |
| Professional | 13.30 | 23.90 | 21.70 |
| Clerical | 03.90 | 04.30 | 14.20 |
| Self-employed | 21.90 | 17.10 | 15.00 |
| Skilled Labourer | 17.20 | 06.80 | 10.10 |
| Farmer | 03.10 | 12.00 | 03.30 |
| Transport/bus driver | 10.90 | 03.40 | 02.40 |
| Unskilled Labourer | 03.90 | 06.00 | 05.80 |
| Unemployed/ pensioner | 03.10 | 03.40 | 00.70 |
| Other** | 08.60 | 06.80 | 07.50 |
| Not disclosed | 00.80 | 00.00 | 00.00 |
* Two of the health workers gave equal weight to two occupations of their respective fathers.
** Included a diversity of occupations, e.g. artist, entertainer, musician, serviceman, policeman, media personality |
Once again, it is probably no surprise to discover that fathers of the
health-workers and students have higher status careers with higher incomes than
the prostitutes' fathers. But it will also come as a surprise to those
influenced by popular culture images of prostitution to find so many of the
prostitutes' fathers in careers and high-level employment. Less than a third of
these men are in blue-collar employment compared to about 15 per cent of the
health workers' fathers and a little less of the students' fathers. It is
interesting to note the similarities and dissimilarities that occur between all
groups, such as prostitutes' and health-workers' fathers corresponding pro rata
as "managing directors", "clerks" and
"unemployed/pensioners", or the equal numbers of prostitutes' and
students' fathers as "farmers". Table 3.11 which
shows male occupations in general in Australia provides an interesting
comparison to this data.
Table 3.11 : Male occupations in Australia, 1989
| Occupation | Number of men | % of male wage earners |
| Managers/administrators | 631,400 | 13.07 |
| Professionals | 585,500 | 12.12 |
| Para-professionals (technicians, police, etc.) | 251,500 | 5.20 |
| Tradespersons | 1,115,400 | 23.08 |
| Clerks | 306,200 | 6.34 |
| Salespersons/ personal service workers | 399,800 | 8.27 |
| Plant/ machinery operators/ transport driver | 501,700 | 10.38 |
| Labourers (factory hands, rural workers, miners, etc.) | 780,300 | 16.15 |
| Unemployed | 260,700 | 5.39 |
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics 1989 |
Taking these averages, it is apparent that the fathers of the women in all three
groups are more often employed in high level occupations (male average 25 per
cent, prostitutes' fathers 27 per cent, health-workers' fathers 40 per cent,
students' fathers 41 per cent) and less often in blue-collar occupations (male
average 50 per cent, prostitutes' fathers 32 per cent, health-workers' fathers
21 per cent, students' fathers 18 per cent). It is reasonable to suppose,
therefore, that all three groups of women were more often raised in middle-class
homes than the average woman.
Religion of origin can also be an index of class, since in Australia Catholicism
has been traditionally associated with the Irish convict labourers of the 19th
century, and Anglicanism more with the religion of the colonial ruling class and
landed gentry. Although religious tastes may have changed considerably in the
succeeding generations of the 20th century, religious institutions, at least
until the present generation with its growing radicalism can still be a clue to
one's class inheritance. Table 3.12 lists the inherited religions of the three
groups.
Table 3.12 : Inherited religion(s) of prostitutes, health-workers, students
| Religion | Prostitutes (n=142)* % | Health-workers (n=129)* % | Students (n=144)* % |
| Church of England | 36.60 | 38.00 | 35.50 |
| Catholic | 42.90 | 32.00 | 29.10 |
| Other Protestant Churches | 09.90 | 23.20 | 20.80 |
| Jewish | 00.70 | 00.80 | 03.50 |
| Islam | 01.40 | 00.00 | 00.70 |
| Buddhism | 00.00 | 00.00 | 01.40 |
| Hinduism | 00.70 | 00.00 | 00.00 |
| Other Christian (Greek Orthodox, Mormon, Jehovah Witness) | 07.80 | 05.40 | 09.00 |
| * In some cases individuals inherited two religions, one from each parent. |
Significantly more prostitutes were raised in Catholic homes than health-workers
and students, and significantly less came from Protestant (apart from Anglican)
homes. However, due to the lesser relevance of religion to class today, this
difference is not a sufficient indicator of class for each group. At most, the
presence of inherited Catholicism might be a clue to one's Irish ancestry. A
comparison of this data with an official census in Table 3.13 is instructive.
Taking this average, prostitutes were raised in considerably more Catholic homes
and considerably less Protestant (apart from Anglican) homes than most women in
New South Wales. However, many people do not continue to adhere to the
religions of their parents throughout their lives. For many reasons, not the
least of which are marriage to partners of other and stronger beliefs, or
changes in ideological perception, certain people either change their religious
beliefs or reject religion altogether. The prostitutes, health-workers and
students are no exception as a comparison of Table 3.12 and 3.14 indicates.
Table 3.13 : Religious followings in Australia, 1986
| Religion | Number of adherents | % of total |
| Church of England | 3,723,419 | 23.90 |
| Catholic | 4,064,413 | 26.10 |
| Other Protestant | 2,559,001 | 16.40 |
| Orthodox | 427,445 | 2.70 |
| Other Christian | 607,630 | 3.90 |
| Islam | 109,523 | 0.70 |
| Jewish | 69,087 | 0.40 |
| Hindu | 21,454 | 0.10 |
| Buddhist | 80,387 | 0.50 |
| Other non-Christian | 35,742 | 0.20 |
| Other religions | 62,949 | 0.40 |
| No religion | 1,977,464 | 12.70 |
| No details | 1,863,642 | 11.90 |
| Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics 1986, Census figures supplied by Sydney office. |
The immediate impact of this comparison is the striking decline in traditional
beliefs and institutional religions. Obviously, many prostitutes had been
disillusioned with traditional religious condemnation of prostitution and sought
another more tolerant form of belief. The few prostitutes who have embraced
Buddhism might reflect this. The only prostitute in the sample who was raised
in a Jehovah Witness family was so repelled by this religion's idea of
excommunicating its members who indulged in commercial sex that she not only
rejected the religion but her family as well. With traditional religion's
strong views on prostitution it is amazing that any prostitutes continue to
acknowledge these systems of belief. Just as many of the prostitutes have
repudiated their inherited religions, so have well over half the health-workers
and students. Most of the latter would have done so on ideological and academic
grounds. However, the fact that most of those who have jettisoned institutional
religions adhere to a form of agnosticism and not atheism indicates that they
have lost faith in orthodox religious beliefs but not in God.
Table 3.14 : Systems of belief at present of prostitutes, health-workers, students
| System of belief | Prostitutes (n = 128) % | Health-workers (n=115) % | Students (n=120) % |
| Church of England | 10.20 | 11.30 | 15.10 |
| Catholic | 20.30 | 09.60 | 13.30 |
| Other Protestant Churches | 05.50 | 07.80 | 08.30 |
| Jewish | 01.60 | 00.00 | 01.70 |
| Islam | 00.00 | 00.00 | 00.80 |
| Buddhism | 02.30 | 00.00 | 02.50 |
| Hinduism | 00.00 | 00.90 | 00.00 |
| Other Christian (Greek Orthodox, Mormon, Jehovah Witness) | 04.70 | 08.70 | 03.30 |
| Agnostic | 39.10 | 40.00 | 40.80 |
| Atheist | 07.00 | 13.00 | 06.70 |
| Other (Spiritualism, etc.) | 09.40 | 08.70 | 07.50 |
As an index of class, residential patterns are even more difficult to analyse
than inherited religions. In the 19th century spatial divisions or an urban
population corresponded more closely to class divisions. But in the late 20th
century the class lines have blurred and there is greater residential mobility
as the earning power of blue-collar employees draws closer to that of white
collar workers, enabling upwardly mobile working-class individuals to purchase
property in traditional middle-class areas. However, cultural familiarity is
still a predominant factor in an individual's selection of residential location,
so that people of working-class upbringing will be attracted to areas
predominated by others of working-class origin. Thus, as a rule of thumb, index
of class in Sydney could be described as: the western and southern suburbs are
predominantly working-class areas, the northern and eastern suburbs
predominantly middle class, while such inner city locations as Kings Cross and
Balmain are indeterminate. By using such a rough guide, the residential pattern
of Table 3.15 might indicate a class configuration for the three sample groups.
No clues to the class proportions in university students generally should be
drawn from this residential pattern since the student sample came from a
university in the metropolitan northwest, and it must be expected that most of
these women would have residences in the northern and western suburbs. To a
lesser extent the same applies to the health-workers, none of whom worked in a
southern hospital or community centre. However, the distribution of brothels in
which the prostitutes worked was randomly selected across the metropolitan area.
The fact that most brothels exist in Kings Cross and the western suburbs and
only a few exist in the northern and eastern suburbs is itself a reflection of
class snobbery.
But, in any case, there is a more even distribution of prostitutes' residences
than in the other two groups, which might indicate that prostitutes are more
likely to seek employment beyond their general residential environs.
Table 3.15 : Permanent residential areas of prostitutes, health-workers, students
| Residential area | Prostitutes (n=128) % | Health-workers (n=115) % | Students (n=120) % |
| Western suburbs | 27.30 | 15.70 | 29.10 |
| Southern suburbs | 11.70 | 01.70 | 01.70 |
| Northern suburbs | 08.60 | 29.60 | 50.00 |
| Eastern suburbs | 10.90 | 16.50 | 03.40 |
| Kings Cross and environs | 23.40 | 03.50 | 00.80 |
| Surry Hills, Redfern and Balmain | 09.90 | 27.80 | 05.00 |
| NSW country areas | 05.00 | 04.30 | 07.50 |
| Interstate | 00.80 | 00.90 | 00.00 |
| Overseas | 00.00 | 00.00 | 01.70 |
| Not disclosed | 02.30 | 00.00 | 00.80 |
What might we conclude from the above statistical profile? Referring once to
again to the findings for education (Table 3.8), fathers's occupation (Table
3.10), inherited religion (Table 3.12) and residence (Table 3.15), two facts
stand out most clearly. Firstly, and perhaps not too surprisingly, is the more
middle-class situation of the health-workers and students, with their higher
education, more fathers in white collar occupations, predominantly Protestant
(including Anglican) upbringings, and greater tendency to choose middle-class
suburbs for residency. Secondly, the prostitutes are inclined towards a diverse
or mixed class delineation. With 61 per cent of them attaining no higher
education than the School Certificate, 30 per cent with fathers in clearly white
collar occupations compared to 32 per cent with fathers in blue-collar jobs, 43
per cent of them raised in Catholic homes compared to 46 per cent in Protestant
(including Anglican) homes, and 39 per cent living in the predominantly
working-class western and southern suburbs of Sydney compared to 20 per cent in
the predominantly middle-class eastern and northern suburbs, it seems that
prostitutes as a group do not vary much from the average class divisions of the
broader female population. Certainly, it can no longer be said with certainty
that prostitutes are predominantly from working-class backgrounds. If anything,
by comparing the prostitutes' own motivated determinants, education achievement
and choice of residential area, with their inherited determinants, father's
socioeconomic position and parental religions, the prostitutes have slightly
descended in social class. This, though, may have nothing to do with the fact
that they are prostitutes, and more to do with a general female position when
she finds herself sliding towards poverty as an outcome of her attempts at
independence or due to dislocation of marriage. Prostitution then would be her
effort to reverse this trend.
The family and social relations of prostitutes
A popular perception of prostitutes assumes them to have been victims of a
negative parental homelife. Indeed, some serious studies have supported this
view. A common finding among psychoanalysts has been that prostitutes are
products of an unresolved Oedipal Complex leading to an uneasy mother-daughter
relationship, and this is offered as an explanation for the subject's adult
propensity towards commercial sex (see Greenwald 1958; Glover 1960; Lichtenstein
1961). More recent empirical studies in America have shown a high incidence of
parental problems in the early homelives of prostitutes. Jennifer James (1979),
for example, found that 51 per cent of 200 women in the sex industry had had
past problems with their parents. In another sample of 200 prostitutes, Mimi
Silbert and Ayala Pines found 60 per cent of these women were raised in broken
homes and two-thirds were physically beaten (Silbert & Pines 1982a, p.
471ff). These studies, however, were based on samples of street prostitutes
with a larger number of juveniles, and should not be considered representative
of prostitutes per se. In an earlier study of mine (Perkins & Bennett 1985,
p. 217), eight of nine women I interviewed at random in a sample of prostitutes
expressed having distant or absent relations with their fathers. In view of
these scientific findings as well as the popular assumption about the homelife
of prostitutes, a comparison between the sample of 128 prostitutes and the two
control groups of 115 health workers and 120 university students in the present
study with respect to their relationships with their parents seems a good place
to start this Section.
Table 3.16 : Relationships between mothers and prostitutes, health-workers, students
| Relationship | Prostitutes (n=128) % | Health-workers (n=115) % | Students (n=120) % |
| Very close | 33.60 | 45.20 | 45.80 |
| Fairly close | 36.70 | 35.70 | 35.80 |
| Not very close | 10.20 | 11.30 | 10.00 |
| Not at all close | 07.00 | 02.60 | 01.60 |
| Very distant | 07.80 | 00.90 | 05.80 |
| Never really knew her | 04.70 | 02.60 | 00.80 |
| Not disclosed | 00.00 | 01.70 | 00.00 |
Table 3.17 : Relationships between fathers and prostitutes, health-workers, students
| Relationship | Prostitutes (n=128) % | Health-workers (n=115) % | Students (n=120) % |
| Very close | 27.30 | 27.00 | 26.70 |
| Fairly close | 33.60 | 34.80 | 40.10 |
| Not very close | 15.60 | 19.10 | 20.00 |
| Not at all close | 05.50 | 05.00 | 05.00 |
| Very distant | 09.40 | 01.70 | 04.10 |
| Never really knew him | 08.60 | 12.20 | 04.10 |
Tables 3.16 and 3.17 illustrate the responses of the prostitutes, health-workers
and students to questions on their relationships to their mothers and fathers at
present. These relations are not always the same as childhood reactions to each
parent, but in most cases adult responses to their parents do reflect the nature
of an ongoing relationship beginning in early childhood.
A significantly higher ratio of prostitutes had dislocated relationships with
their mothers than the other two groups, while the pattern of relationships with
fathers is similar across all three groups. However, even in the case of
prostitutes' mothers the dysphoria in relationships with their daughters is not
high enough to assume this as a causal factor in prostitution. In any case,
overall, more of the prostitutes were closer to their mothers than their
fathers. Only a few of the prostitutes had extremely strained relationships
with both parents. This indicates a negative homelife for these particular
women, who as girls must have had unhappy dispositions with neither parent to
confide in. It is this situation, rather than a dislocated relationship with
one parent only, which is more likely to lead the adolescent girl into leaving
home and becoming involved with juvenile street subcultures, including
prostitution, as a means of survival. Since this applies to only a small
minority of the women in this study, this process cannot be considered common to
most prostitutes. It may, though, be much more frequent among the minority
sub-group of sex workers, the streetwalkers, and most prominent among juvenile
prostitutes, which is why the adolescent "drift" into prostitution appears as a
high incidence in studies of street and juvenile prostitutes, such as conducted
by James (1977), Silbert and Pines (1982), Nanette Davis (197 1) and others.
What this study indicates is that, in general, prostitutes come from relatively
stable natal home environments.
Table 3.18 : Relationships between parents of prostitutes, health-workers, students
| Relationship | Prostitutes (n=133)* % | Health-workers (n=125)* % | Students (n=125)* % |
| Happily married | 45.10 | 48.10 | 63.50 |
| Unhappily married | 08.30 | 14.80 | 13.60 |
| Separated | 05.30 | 03.70 | 01.50 |
| Divorced: Neither parent remarried | 01.50 | 00.00 | 00.70 |
| Divorced: Both parents remarried | 09.90 | 03.70 | 07.40 |
| Divorced: Mother only remarried | 09.00 | 02.30 | 01.50 |
| Divorced: Father only remarried | 06.00 | 07.40 | 04.70 |
| Deceased: Mother only deceased | 01.50 | 05.20 | 00.70 |
| Deceased: Father only deceased | 10.50 | 08.90 | 04.00 |
| Deceased: Both parents deceased | 03.00 | 05.90 | 02.40 |
| * Refers to more than one of the situations listed in some cases. |
Table 3.18 compares the relationships between the parents of all three groups.
Very little separates the three groups in terms of their parents relationships.
Nearly half of the prostitutes and health-workers and almost two-thirds of the
students felt their parents were happily mar-ried, while less than 15 per cent
of the health-workers and students and less than 10 per cent of the prostitutes
thought their parents marriage was an unhappy one. There does not appear to be
any evidence here of the prostitutes having a higher frequency of broken homes,
although it seems apparent by the IO per cent higher ratio of divorces among the
prostitutes' parents that earlier dislocations of marriage had occurred, but
these were terminated by divorce and remarriage rather than enduring an
intolerable situation, such as seems more the case among the parents of the
health-workers and students with their higher ratios of unhappy marriages. Nor
can it be concluded here that the prostitutes were any more influenced by
parental example in divorce trends than the other two (compare divorce figures
in Tables 3.4 and 3.18). Other factors are involved here.
Popular mythology on prostitutes perceive these women as the products of broken
homes. If we measure a "broken home" by the divorce of the parents (which, of
course, only recognises the final manifestation of marriage breakdown, while it
overlooks the hundreds more homes in constant turmoil without a termination of
marriage), we find that for every three homes that are made, one breaks up, or,
in 1987 114,113 marriages and 39,725 divorces took place across Australia in
1987 (Australian Bureau of Statistics 1988 and 1986). Considering that only 26
per cent of marriages ended in divorce among the parents of the prostitute
sample, it would seem that the prostitutes had come from relatively happy
homelives.
One study suggests that prostitutes were more often the firstborn in their natal
families (Potterat et al. 1984). But as Table 3.19 illustrates this was not the
case in the present study. The prostitutes were neither more often firstborn
than the other positions in the natal family order, nor more often firstborn
than the health-workers or students. Prevalence of firstborn in the
aforementioned study is probably an isolated example.
Table 3.19 : Position in natal family of prostitutes, health-workers, students
| Position in family | Prostitutes (n=123)* % | Health-workers (n=108)* % | Students (n=117)* % |
| Oldest child | 31.70 | 34.30 | 33.30 |
| Second oldest child | 18.70 | 14.80 | 06.80 |
| Middle child | 18.70 | 15.70 | 16.20 |
| Second youngest child | 08.90 | 06.50 | 09.50 |
| Youngest child | 21.20 | 28.70 | 34.20 |
| Not disclosed | 00.80 | 00.00 | 00.00 |
| * Those who were the only child in their families not included. |
Table 3.20 : Relationships between prostitutes, health-workers, students and their siblings
| Relationship | Prostitutes (n=123)* % | Health-workers (n=108)* % | Students (n=117)* % |
| Close to all siblings | 48.80 | 55.60 | 57.20 |
| Close to some only | 16.30 | 20.40 | 18.00 |
| Close to sister(s) only | 05.70 | 04.60 | 05.10 |
| Close to brother(s) only | 03.30 | 03.70 | 00.00 |
| Not close to any | 25.20 | 15.70 | 18.00 |
| Not disclosed | 00.80 | 00.00 | 01.70 |
| *Those who were the only child in their families not included. |
Very little attention has been paid in past studies to the rela-tionships
between siblings among prostitutes. It might be supposed that poor sibling
relations coupled with poor relations with parents could lead to an individual's
isolation in their natal family, resulting in some psychopathological factor
that might presuppose prostitu-tion. Table 3.20 compares sibling relations in
the three sample groups.
Significantly less of the prostitutes are close to all or some of their
siblings, and significantly more are not close to any of them, than the other
two groups, whose patterns are similar to each other. But this difference is
not sufficient enough to place any importance on sibling relations as a
determining factor for prostitution. Undoubtedly there are a few individuals
isolated from both their parents and siblings in their natal family who were
socially disturbed enough by this situation to lead them into an early departure
from their parental homes and a consequent "drift" into commercial sex for
survival. However, they represent such a minority that this problem could not
be considered as a cause of prostitution. Incidences of dysfunctioning sibling
relations and isolation in the natal family might, nevertheless, appear with
higher regularity among juvenile street prostitutes.
Social isolation can be a precursor for an antisocial or psycho-logically
disturbed way of life. Behavioural theorists have alerted us to the effects of
social environment on one's social perceptions and modes of behaviour.
Behavioural psychologists have shown in ani-mal experiments that monkeys, for
instance, isolated from their kin and others act differently and appear more
disturbed than those raised in normal surroundings with mothers, siblings and
others (Harlow 1962); or in studies of dogs, pups reared in isolation were more
timid. excitable and generally immature than pups raised with their siblings and
other puppies (Thompson & Melzak 1956, pp. 38-42). In a sociological
context "isolation" means estrangement from normative social needs and cultural
goals. while "normlessness" re-fers to a feeling by an individual that
illegitimate means are necessary for attaining socially desirable goals (Seeman
1959). The psychoanalytical, psychological and sociological literature on
pros-titution has often carried the implication that social isolation in the
formative years of a prostitute's life leads to anti-social behaviour,
"alienation" or "anomie". By "antisocial" is meant prostitution, while "anomie"
is the condition of disjunction with society leading to social alienation. We
have already seen that there does not appear to be any apparent dislocations
within the natal families of most prostitutes to enable isolation and a sense of
"normlessness" to develop in adulthood. The nature of relationships with
perceived friends throughout life has also been measured in this study. Table
3.21 compares childhood relationships.
Over 60 per cent from each group had many or a few friends in childhood, while
more of the prostitutes were friendless as children. But little separates the
three groups, and nothing can be gained to indicate significantly more
prostitutes were isolated as children than women in general. Thus, for all
intents and purposes those girls who became prostitutes as adults experienced
average childhood relations.
Table 3.22 compares relationships of the three groups in their adolescence.
Table 3.21 : Close childhood friends of prostitutes, health-workers, students
| No. of friends | Prostitutes (n=128) % | Health-workers (n=115) % | Students (n=120) % |
| Many friends | 19.50 | 16.50 | 23.30 |
| A few friends | 42.20 | 55.60 | 40.80 |
| Two or three friends | 16.40 | 13.90 | 15.90 |
| One friend only | 14.10 | 12.20 | 15.90 |
| No friends | 07.00 | 00.90 | 03.30 |
| Not disclosed | 00.80 | 00.90 | 00.80 |
Table 3.22 : Close adolescent friends of prostitutes, health-workers, students
| No. of friends | Prostitutes (n=128) % | Health-workers (n=115) % | Students (n=120) % |
| Many friends | 22.60 | 16.50 | 16.70 |
| A few friends | 42.90 | 63.50 | 53.30 |
| Two or three friends | 16.40 | 11.30 | 19.20 |
| One friend only | 12.50 | 06.10 | 08.10 |
| No friends | 05.50 | 01.70 | 01.70 |
| Not disclosed | 00.00 | 00.90 | 00.80 |
The pattern of adolescent friendships resembles that in childhood, although
there is a slight increase in all three groups acquiring many or a few friends
and a slight decrease overall in the number choosing only one close friend.
This is probably a development not unfamiliar in friendship selection in
adolescence, with its emphasis on group bonding, affirmation of sexual and
gender identity and cult conformity. The important point to make in the context
of this study, though, is that the prostitutes vary little from the other two
sample groups.
By adulthood, individuals tend to develop close friendships with others of their
gender, while the opposite gender tends to be perceived more as sexual objects.
Table 3.23, then, measures close friendships between women, rather than both
genders.
Table 3.23 : Close women friends of prostitutes, health-workers, students
| No. of friends | Prostitutes (n=128) % | Health-workers (n=115) % | Students (n=120) % |
| Many women friends | 21.90 | 53.90 | 63.30 |
| A few women friends | 42.90 | 36.50 | 24.20 |
| Two or three women friends | 27.30 | 07.80 | 08.30 |
| Only one woman friend | 04.70 | 01.80 | 02.50 |
| No women friends | 03.20 | 00.00 | 01.70 |
In the adult pattern the health-workers and students have in-creased their close
friendships considerably, while the prostitutes have stabilised their numbers of
friends, except for an increase in two or three friends and a decrease in only
one woman friend. This vari-ation by the prostitutes might be explained by
their preference for a small coterie of trusted friends, rather than large
numbers, since it may reflect a need to minimise the number of women confidants
once the prostitutes had begun work in commercial sex. In my expe-rience with
prostitute women, many of them seem to have lonely lives in social isolation
outside the sex industry. They will often form close friendships with other
women working with them, and these friendships continue beyond the context of
work into their everyday lives. Obviously, for many prostitutes there is a
strong need to have at least one other woman with whom they can confide in and
trust, and another prostitute is the ideal companion for this purpose.
For many women love relationships are as essential for social well-being as
friendships, and prostitutes are no exception. As we have seen (p. 175), the
prostitute sample married more often than the other two groups and experienced a
higher pro rata breakdown in marriage. The possibility of a higher aspiration
for conventionality among the prostitutes by their persistence with marriage
even after divorce and separation has already been noted. It would be essential
for them to choose a mate (particularly after a first marriage breakdown due to
their prostitution) with an exceptionally tolerant attitude, not only for their
own sake but also for any children from a previous marriage. One might assume
that their clients would be an obvious choice here, but, as we shall see, very
few prostitutes develop relationships with their clients, let alone marry them.
Most clients are already married, and besides, perceptions about one another as
"whore" and "client" stereotypes usually prevents relationships de-veloping
beyond that of commercial pleasantries. Prostitutes, therefore, seek
exceptional men (or women, in the case of lesbians) as lovers or second
husbands; not only men with understanding and high tolerance, but often also
trustworthy and devoted, and (since clients could not be trusted because they
cheat on their wives) as different in personality and attitudes to the women's
clients as possible.
One method of comparing the nature of love relationships in the three groups is
by measuring the duration of the women's current love or marriage relationship.
Table 3.24 is the result of this comparison.
Although variations exist from group to group, overall the pattern is not
dissimilar, with a third each of the prostitutes and students in a relationship
of more than three years duration, a quarter of the health-workers in a similar
situation, and about a third of all three groups in no present relationship.
Considerably fewer of the prostitutes have relationships beyond ten years
duration, which may reflect breakdowns in earlier marriages when these women
took up prostitution for a living. On the other hand, more of the prostitutes
managed relationships of more than three years duration than the health-workers,
indicating high stability in second marriages and more carefully selected lovers
among the prostitutes. But in the overall analysis of the findings for this
variable there is little that might clearly demark prostitutes from other women
on the basis of greater instability in love relationships.
Finally, there is a need to illustrate an overall circumstance of social
relations vis-a-vis social isolation in the daily lives of the three sample
groups. This might best be demonstrated by measuring the extent of shared
living quarters with others. Table 3.25 compares the three groups' companions
in these living circumstances.
Table 3.24 : Duration of present love/marriage relationships of prostitutes, health-workers, students
| Duration of relationship | Prostitutes (n=128) % | Health-workers (n=115) % | Students (n=120) % |
| Over 1O years | 04.70 | 13.90 | 15.00 |
| 5-10 years | 12.50 | 07.80 | 04.20 |
| 3-5 years | 19.50 | 13.90 | 05.00 |
| 1-3 years | 07.80 | 08.70 | 15.00 |
| 6 months to a year | 10.20 | 09.60 | 05.00 |
| 1-6 months | 06.30 | 07.00 | 13.30 |
| Less than a month | 03.90 | 01.70 | 05.00 |
| No present relationship | 29.70 | 34.90 | 35.80 |
| Not disclosed | 05.40 | 02.60 | 01.70 |
Table 3.25 : Companions in present shared accommodations of prostitutes, health-workers, students
| Companions | Prostitutes (n=132)* % | Health-workers (n=115) % | Students (n=120) % |
| Husband and children | 09.10 | 12.20 | 17.50 |
| Lover and children | 06.80 | 01.80 | 00.80 |
| Husband only | 05.30 | 07.80 | 04.20 |
| Lover only | 14.40 | 14.80 | 07.50 |
| Children only | 09.10 | 05.20 | 04.20 |
| Natal family | 09.10 | 05.20 | 44.20 |
| Friends/flatmates | 30.30 | 33.90 | 15.80 |
| Lives alone | 15.90 | 19.10 | 05.80 |
| *Some respondents gave multiple answers. |
In this configuration there is a lack of overall uniformity. In some instances
the prostitutes and health-workers are similar, in others the health-workers
and students are similar. One explanation for the high incidence of students
living in their parental homes is a need for financial support from their natal
families in the process of tertiary learning. Somewhat surprising are the
number of prostitutes who have remained attached to their natal families;it is
difficult to imagine many parents approving of their daughters' prostitution,
so the subterfuge necessary within this living environment can only be
imagined. Considerable numbers of the prostitutes and health-workers are
living alone. But rather than suggesting loneliness, it is more likely a
choice by the individuals involved to have living quarters entirely to
themselves. For prostitutes. the social isolation, if it occurs at all, is an
outcome of a public disclosure of their prostitution and is as much a group, as
an individual experience. Thus, it is likely that many of the friends and
flatmates sharing accommodation with the prostitutes are also prostitutes; at
the very least, they are likely to be empathetic living companions. In sum, the
prostitutes' pattern of sharing accommodation is only slightly differentiated
from the other groups, and certainly not enough to indicate any strikingly
diverse social circumstance to the norm for most women.
What conclusions might we draw from the prostitutes' statistical profile on
family and social relations'? To begin with, they have better relations with
their mothers than their fathers, although not quite as close to their mothers
as the health-workers and students. It does not appear that the prostitutes
have emerged from more broken homes or turbulent homelives than the average
population of women. Their relations with their siblings seems to be slightly
better than with their parents, but a considerable number of them have negative
relations with all their siblings.
In the patterns of friendships the prostitutes do not diverge much from the
health-workers or students in childhood and adolescent relations, but seem to
have less women friends in adulthood. This may be due to a preference for close
and trusted confidants rather than a wide circle of female companions, which
would increase the risk of disclosure and disapproval for their occupational
lifestyles.
Contrary to popular thought, prostitutes are neither loveless nor particularly
promiscuous women in their private social lives. The sample in this study
indicates a high level of stable love relationships, even if there is also a
high level of breakdowns in earlier marriages. It would appear that these women
are much more careful in selecting mates in subsequent relationships.
In their pattern of shared accommodation, the prostitutes are not markedly
different to the health-workers. It refutes any suggestion that prostitutes are
social isolates, living lonely lives devoid of other human contact apart from
workmates and clients. Like most women they share their living quarters with
husbands or lovers and their children, or, as with many young single women, with
friends and chosen flatmates. Some, like some women in general, choose to live
alone, probably for the same reasons: quietude, their own living space, or
having a home to which they might retreat from the hassles of social and
occupational life.
Most importantly, this study is representative of a broad population of
prostitute women, and as such contrasts with findings from American street and
juvenile prostitutes, with their bleak family backgrounds, as seen in the
studies of Jennifer James (1977), Mimi Silbert and Ayala Pines (1982), and
Nanette Davis (1971). This is not to suggest that the prostitutes interviewed
in this study did not experience bad and threatening early homelives. Sharleen,
a brothel worker in East Sydney, had negative relations with both her parents.
Of her father, she says: "All I can remember was him standing in the doorway
with a suitcase." Her experiences with her mother were very violent:
Our mother was drunk all the time. She was very cruel to me, and
used to beat me a lot. Once she nearly chopped off my finger.
Bondage mistress Fatale feels she acquired a psychological
masochism from her childhood experiences:
My childhood was such a hell. I was tortured much of the time.
My mother left me when I was four, and so I was with my father a lot of the
time, and he had different people looking after me. One man used to chase me
around the back yard when I was five or six years old with a slug gun shooting
slugs at me, and he locked me in the toilet all day while my father was at work.
I used to have these nightmares of being stabbed constantly. I had one small
room with my father. and I would wait in there for him to come home from work or
from dancing. I had no one else, just him. So I would wait for him to come
home; constantly I waited for him.
June, a North Shore parlour worker, had an emotional and a
communicative void in her relations with her mother:
We have nothing in common and just don't get along at all. We are
very different in terms of personality, what our needs are and what our goals
are. We simply don't like each other.
Brothel worker Jeanette's recollections of her mother were of
her distant respect and admiration for her:
I can't ever remember my mother coming to visit me at my
grandparents' farm, where I lived. until this one time when I was about ten.
She was the epitome of everything they talked about. She went out and sat on
the veranda and painted her nails red, and she fixed up her hair because she was
going out with one of my cousins that night who was as much a floozy as my
mother was supposed to be. I was just fascinated. I watched them put on this
polish and do their hair, and I thought it was the most wonderful thing. And I
never lost this fascination for her, which I think had a lot to do with the fact
that I never really knew her.
Any person seeking explanations in the early lives of prostitutes might well
point to Sharleen's horrific childhood experiences, or imagine that June's
strained relations with her mother is reflected somehow in her unemotional
encounters with men in commercial sex, or even suppose that Jeanette's
fascination for her mother's floozy ways ended in her emulating her by becoming
a prostitute. Like the psychoanalysts early this century they seek any
idiosyncrasy as a causal source without considering the possibility that there
might not be any relation between these various social circumstances in the
early lives of these women. To imagine that prostitution is the outcome of
multi-faceted negative childhood experiences is to overlook the many prostitutes
who had positive and obviously nurturing natal home environments. Martine, for
example, has a deep rapport with her father, in spite of the not uncommon
reservations in most father-daughter relations:
I spend a lot of time with my father. I go on annual holidays
with him; we go away every year. We are very close but we don't talk about
sexual things or very personal things. We tend to keep our conversation on a
political and philosophical basis.
Maggie, who works in a small North Shore parlour, is a member of a Jewish
extended family with its strong tradition of intra-familial support. She was
raised in a nurturing environment in which the oldest generation adopts the
caring responsibility for the rest of the family. No better environment existed
for developing a sense of security, confidence and belonging in a child. She
recalls her childhood with fond reminiscence:
As a child I was close to my grandmother, whereas I felt very
competitive with my mother, who was very young, and I think because my
grandmother took the mothering role it relieved her of that responsibility. But
when my marriage broke up I immediately went back to living with my mother, who
took care of my son, looking after him just as my grandmother had looked after
me. At the time my mother and I became very close to one another.
These vignettes in the lives of these women provide support to the statistical
data earlier in this Section. That data indicate that some prostitutes had
negative relations with their parents, and experienced torturous childhoods in
their natal family environments. The data also indicate that some led lonely,
friendless lives in childhood and adolescence, some have had more than one
unstable love relationship, and some live entirely alone out of choice or
otherwise. However, the data indicate that more prostitutes experienced
relatively stable parental home environments, had a number of friends in
childhood and adolescence, have a stable love relationship, and share their
living space with others. What all of this suggests is that prostitutes do not
appear to have less than average family and social backgrounds.
Sex lives of prostitutes
Not too surprisingly many studies of prostitute women have turned to events in
the pre-prostitution sex lives of their subjects in order to determine some
predisposing factor for prostitution. James, for instance. found her prostitute
sample more involved in incestual relations as children than other women (James
& Myerding 1977). Silbert and Pines (1982a) found 60 per cent of their
sample of 200 prostitutes were victims of child sexual abuse, and a third had
been incest victims. Jennifer James, in fact developed an elaborate theory on
causality of prostitution on the basis of her findings on the early sexual
experiences of young prostitutes (see pp. 44-5). Other researchers were more
intrigued by prostitutes' commercial sexuality compared to their sexuality in
private life. Wardell Pomeroy (1965, p. 177ff), for instance, was interested in
the extent of orgasmic experience of sex workers, at work and in private. But
we shall return to that question later. Firstly, we will compare the three
sample groups' sexual experiences in childhood to determine whether, in fact
prostitutes had earlier or different such experiences than other women.
Table 3.26 measures the ages of the three groups' earliest sexual experience,
and Table 3.27 measures the type of experience.
Table 3.26 : Age of first sexual experience of prostitutes, health-workers, students
| Age | Prostitutes (n=128) % | Health-workers (n=115) % | Students (n=120) % |
| Under 7 years | 21.90 | 31.30 | 33.30 |
| 7 - 10 years | 22.70 | 34.80 | 26.70 |
| 11 - 13 years | 18.70 | 04.30 | 18.30 |
| 14 - 16 years | 28.10 | 15.70 | 11.70 |
| 17 - 20 years | 06.30 | 08.70 | 07.50 |
| Over 20 years | 01.50 | 02.60 | 00.00 |
| Not disclosed | 00.80 | 02.60 | 02.50 |
Table 3.27 : Type of first sexual experience of prostitutes, health-workers, students
| First sexual experience | Prostitutes (n=131)* % | Health-workers (n=117)* % | Students (n=120) % |
| Children's games | 28.20 | 35.10 | 41.70 |
| Exploring genitals | 20.60 | 30.80 | 17.50 |
| Masturbation | 13.70 | 06.80 | 14.20 |
| Heavy petting | 20.60 | 22.20 | 23.30 |
| Intercourse | 16.80 | 05.10 | 02.50 |
| Not disclosed | 00.00 | 00.00 | 00.80 |
| *Some respondents gave multiple answers. |
From this comparison it can be clearly seen that the prostitutes tended to be
older than the others when they experienced their first sexual event. More than
half, in fact, were more than ten years old when they had their first sexual
experience, compared to just over a third of the health-workers and 40 per cent
of the students. Thus, it would seem that the prostitutes were, on average,
older than the other women with their initial sexual encounters. Of course,
children's sexuality is now considered normal and healthy in the development of
the human being, but are the prostitutes "normal" here or late developers in
experiencing sex? Alfred Kinsey's monumental study of females is still regarded
as the guidepost on sexual development, and his data found 48 per cent of
females experiencing pre-pubescent sexual games (Kinsey et al. 1953, p.
107). The prostitutes are closer to this figure than the other two
groups. Martine recalls her first sexual experience at five years of age,
and she remembers this as orgasmic:
My very first sexual experience was with this little girl over the
road. We used to go down into this huge garden where we lived and we used to do
this fantasy masturbation theme with hoses and stethoscopes. I can remember
having orgasms at five. They were definitely orgasms, and she did too. They
were definitely sexual because we would take our clothes off and both reach
orgasm. Then we weren't interested in the game any more. We
used to play these games two or three times a week.
Kings Cross parlour worker Caroline remembers one of her
earliest sexual experiences was also with a girl her own age:
I was six and with this little girl across the road we used to
play lovers, pretend we were adult lovers and kiss and cuddle. I used to think
that was really dirty, and that's why we did it.
Childhood adventures with the opposite sex seem just as common, for example
Laura, whose initial sexual experience was "with little Billy; it was a kind of
you show me yours and I'll show you mine, and that must have been when I was
seven". Katherine is another private call girl, whose earliest sexual
experience was much the same and also at the same age:
My sister and I were staying on a farm, and there was this monster
of a kid called Bevan. We were up in the hayloft in the barn, and he just got
his "willy" out. There was a bit of a fascination there for me. but I can't
remember showing him my genitals in return.
One interesting fact stands out in the figures above: the much higher number of
prostitutes whose first sexual encounter was intercourse. This might imply a
particularly sheltered childhood for some, or, at least, one devoid of sexual
experimenting, even of petting as a prelude to future vaginal sex. When these
women underwent a coital experience as their first sexual encounter they were
likely to have been in their adolescence. Without preparatory sexual
experiences, intercourse may have had a deeper than average impact on the
individual, loading her with guilt. The internalising shame resulting from this
may have convinced some young women of their loose morals, leading them into
prostitution. But this is mere speculation based on the flimsiest evidence of a
few individual prostitutes and a slightly higher incidence of coitus as the
initial sexual contact among the prostitutes. In the overall pattern, however,
most of the prostitutes are not too divergent from the other two
groups. Their first experiences simply came later, and this alone contradicts a
popular myth about prostitutes as promiscuous girls from childhood.
Call girl Laura, whose childhood was spent in America, said that intense sexual
passion and orgasm wasn't avoided in adolescence but vaginal intercourse was
avoided:
With lots of American girls, particularly Catholic girls, we learn
to give a blow-job before intercourse. And that was about a year before my
first actual intercourse at 17.
This is probably not too different for many Australian teenagers today. In such
instances, though, it is the female who initiates these early sexual encounters.
Is this always the case in childhood?
Society is becoming much more aware of the extent of child sexual assaults, and
these it seems are much more common sexual experiences with girls than once
realised, as some intensive research in this area has shown. A number of
studies in America indicate that anywhere between 15 per cent and 35 per cent of
females have been sexually assaulted prior to 18 years of age (NSW Government
Child Sexual Assault Task Force 1984). Finkelhor (1979, p. 70) found that:
"girls rate their experiences more negatively than do boys; 66 per cent
compared to 38 per cent". This same study reported that in most instances of
child sexual assault the perpetrator was a relative or trusted friend.
"Assault" or "molestation" are emotive terms used to describe these forms of
adult-child sexual relations, but they do not always assess the situation in
reality. Parlour worker Zoe explained her circumstances thus:
My mother's lover was living in our house since I was 11 and he used to give us
cuddles. In looking back now, it was sexual molestation I suppose, but my twin
sister and I competed for his favours. We fell in love with him, absolutely
adored him.
Nevertheless, cases of adult-child sexual contact, if not outright assault, or
where the child is a willing participant, are considered to be manipulative, in
which the adult persuades the child to go along with the event. In any case,
most psychologists seem to feel that the encounter, regardless of who initiated
it, is likely to prove negative for the child, if only as an outcome of guilt.
Certainly in prostitution studies it is regarded as having a detrimental effect
on the child and an important feature predisposing prostitution. In the James
(1979) and Silbert (1982) studies, as we have noted earlier, their prostitute
samples reported very high incidences of child sexual assault. Table 3.28
compares the ages of child sexual abuse of the three sample groups in the study,
and Table 3.29 compares the perpetrators.
Table 3.28 : Ages of those prostitutes, health-workers, students who were sexually abused as children
| Age | Prostitutes (n=50)* % | Health-workers (n=34)* % | Students (n=22)* % |
| Under 5 years | 10.00 | 08.80 | 04.50 |
| 5-7 years | 16.00 | 29.40 | 31.90 |
| 7-10 years | 26.00 | 32.40 | 31.90 |
| 10-13 years | 34.00 | 23.50 | 22.70 |
| 13-15 years | 14.00 | 05.90 | 04.50 |
| Not disclosed | 00.00 | 00.00 | 04.50 |
| *Actual number of respondents who underwent this experience. |
Table 3.29 : Perpetrators of child sexual assault of prostitutes, health-workers, students
| Perpertrator relationship | Prostitutes (n=128) % | Health-workers (n=115) % | Students (n=120) % |
| Total stranger | 03.90 | 04.30 | 02.50 |
| Known to victim but not kin | 12.50 | 10.40 | 05.00 |
| Uncle | 04.70 | 03.50 | 03.50 |
| Older brother | 02.30 | 01.80 | 01.70 |
| Stepfather | 04.70 | 00.00 | 00.00 |
| Natural father | 07.00 | 03.50 | 03.30 |
| Other kin (e.g. cousin) | 03.90 | 05.20 | 02.50 |
| Never assaulted as child | 60.90 | 71.30 | 81.70 |
In Table 3.29 10 per cent difference separates the ratio of child victims in the
three groups (that is 39 per cent of the prostitutes, 29 per cent of the
health-workers, 18 per cent of the students). The health-workers and the
students fall within the expected ratio for child sexual assault victims, while
the prostitutes are only slightly above it. Thus, it is not sufficient to
project assumptions about prostitutes as particularly prone to sexual assault in
childhood. Once again, as the James (1979) and Silbert (1992) studies indicate,
this might be more apparent among the minority sub-groups of street and juvenile
prostitutes in the total population of sex workers. The general pattern of
perpetrators seem to correlate with Finkelhor's (1979) findings.
A question that might arise from this discussion on child sexual experiences, in
view of its relationship to prostitution as a method of economic survival, is
whether the prostitutes had been more often offered cash as children to comply
with the sexual demands of adults. Were they "trained" as children for the role
of a prostitute? Table 3.30 compares the three groups on this issue.
Table 3.30 : Pecuniary gain or the granting of cash or gifts in exchange for sexual favours of prostitutes, health-workers, students as children
| Gain | Prostitutes (n=128) % | Health-workers (n=115) % | Students (n=120) % |
| Given cash/ gifts for sex | 07.80 | 01.80 | 00.00 |
| Never offered cash/ gifts for sexual favours | 85.20 | 88.70 | 87.50 |
| Uncertain/ cannot recall | 07.00 | 09.50 | 12.50 |
Certainly the prostitutes were offered cash or gifts as children in exchange for
sexual favours much more often then the other two groups. But since (even if we
include the "uncertain" percentage) this only amounts to a handful, no
conclusion can be drawn as an indication that this event is a common experience
in the lives of prostitutes.
Several of the women interviewed commented on their experience as child sexual
assault victims. Streetwalker Kelly, whom you will remember as a victim of her
foster brother in the Christian family, was an even earlier victim:
The earliest memory I have is of this man without any clothes on
and I was very young, possibly three, and all he had on was a singlet. He was
trying to drag me onto a bed. Now that's all I can remember.
Caroline also had an earliest memory of an assault: "The first thing that ever
happened was some old man putting his hand up my pants". Obviously, these
earliest memories had a lingering impact on some women, but later on it seems to
have been less of an impact and more accepted as sexual development. Katherine
recalls:
When I was about 11, I had these uncle characters who had a
strange attraction for me. One was a friend of the family whom we called
"uncle", and the other was my mother's father's brother, whom she called
"uncle". Her uncle was an old boy who used to offer me cigarettes for kisses,
and would cuddle me when Mum and Dad were out of the room. The friend of the
family did much the same thing with me and my sister. They never left any scars
with me. It just made me curious.
Some people could suppose that this nonchalance in Katherine as a child
predisposed her for prostitution. But she did not enter the sex industry until
her early 30s, a relatively late starting date for prostitutes generally. North
Shore parlour worker June also was unperturbed by a childhood sexual assault
upon her:
I can't remember when it was or anything like that. but
it is a memory I have of the boy next door - 19 I think he was - babysitting me.
It obviously didn't have much of an impact on me. I suppose I might have been
nine or ten.
June didn't rush into prostitution either, entering it at 24 when she was in
dire poverty. It would seem that some women are much less traumatised by
adult-child sexual contact than others. Of course, this may have a lot to do
with the nature of the assault, whether it was violent or threatening to the
child or not. But the child's attitude towards sex might be an important factor
in her response to the experience. A child raised to fear sex and internalise
guilt, for instance, is likely to react with greater alarm and be
psychologically affected by an adult attempting to have sex with her than one
with a healthy comfortable attitude to sex who is intrigued by it rather than
afraid. The forthcoming evidence would suggest that many, if not most, women
who become prostitutes are in the latter category.
Marie was raised to accept sex in the normal course of growing up:
Sex was never a big deal in our family. My family walked around
in the nude in front of one another. We were quite sexually educated, so when
it happened we never made a big thing of it, but it was part of what we were
doing, such as playing around with other kids, fingering one another, playing
doctor and nurses, mothers and fathers, things like that.
Marie's first love affair has all the earmarks of childhood
innocence, until it received the scrutiny of adult society:
I remember having this lesbian relationship with this girl living
two doors up. I wrote her this really explicit letter about how much I liked
playing with her Mum's vibrator and how much I loved her and loved her breasts.
She was about 12 and my first real love affair. Although I was only nine or ten
it was intense. When it all came out it was horrible, it really hurt. We
weren't even aware that it could be considered sordid. As a matter of fact, my
friend came home one day and said to me that one of her school mates had
described her as a lesbian. We didn't know what the word meant, so we looked it
up in the dictionary and asked around. Only then did we find out that people
thought it was really appalling.
Marie's case is not unusual among many lesbians, and I suspect not unique among
heterosexual women either. She does not describe herself as lesbian today, but
sees herself as bisexual, although she admits that most of her love affairs in
adulthood have been with men. Also, Marie, too, did not enter prostitution as a
youngster; she was 20 at the time and in economic difficulties.
A number of studies have stressed the high ratio of lesbians working in
heterosexual prostitution. This was a not uncommon appraisal by psychoanalysts.
Caprio, for example, claimed that lesbians were more likely to become
prostitutes than heterosexual women, due to a psychological defence against
suppressed homosexual inclinations (Caprio & Brenner 1961). Table 3.31
indicates the sexuality of the three sample groups.
Table 3.31 : Sexuality of prostitutes, health-workers, students
| Sexuality | Prostitutes (n=128) % | Health-workers (n=115) % | Students (n=120) % |
| Heterosexual | 67.20 | 69.90 | 90.80 |
| Homosexual | 09.40 | 21.70 | 03.30 |
| Bisexual (ambisexual) | 21.10 | 07.80 | 04.20 |
| Not disclosed | 02.30 | 00.90 | 01.70 |
Kinsey and his co-workers (1953, p. 488) found 3 per cent of women exclusively
homosexual and 20 per cent with some past homosexual experiences. It is likely
to be at least twice that ratio today; but even so, the health-workers have an
exceptionally high ratio of lesbians, and the prostitutes have a moderately high
ratio. Probably, the prostitutes, with their nearly a third lesbians and
bisexuals, are closer to the general population of women than the other two
groups.
Some people might argue that prostitutes, by the very nature of their work, can
never be described as "exclusive lesbians". But, it might be equally argued
that the very nature of their work can reinforce a woman's lesbian identity,
given that most prostitutes insist that commercial sex is exclusively work. In
fact, it may be easier for a lesbian to separate prostitution as work from
private sex as pleasure than many heterosexual women, since, in the lesbian's
opinion lovemaking with other women, is her true sexual identity. It might be
allegorical to a public executioner or an abattoir slaughterman who would never
consider killing people or animals in their private lives. In any case, those
who insist that real lesbians could not be involved in heterosexual prostitution
probably assume that all lesbians are misanthropic, which, of course, is far
from true.
First sexual (vaginal) intercourse, or "loss" of virginity, is considered a
highlight of a woman's sexual development and marks the commencement of "mature"
sexuality in a penile-heterosexual sense (of course, in a lesbian sense another
event might suggest the same level of importance). Here a roughly equal
significance in the initial coital experience for all of the samples has been
assumed. Table 3.32 compares the age of the event in the three groups.
Table 3.32 : Age at first sexual intercourse of prostitutes, health-workers, students
| Age | Prostitutes (n=128) % | Health-workers (n=115) % | Students (n=120) % |
| Under 12 | 07.80 | 00.90 | 03.30 |
| 12-15 years | 41.40 | 10.40 | 05.00 |
| 15-18 years | 35.90 | 31.30 | 32.60 |
| 18-20 years | 09.40 | 31.30 | 25.80 |
| 20-25 years | 02.30 | 17.40 | 08.30 |
| Over 25 | 00.80 | 03.50 | 00.80 |
| Not disclosed, or still virgins | 02.30* | 05.20 | 24.20** |
*Obviously none of these prostitutes were virgins.
**In view of the number of adolescent students, many are virgins. |
The prostitutes really stand out here. Nearly half of them had experienced
coitus by 15 years of age, compared to only 11 per cent of the health-workers
and 8 per cent of the students. Between the ages of 15 and 18 about a third of
each of the health-workers and about a quarter of the students "lost" their
virginity. In other words, the prostitutes had preceded the others in "losing"
their virginity by a few years: 85 per cent of the prostitutes had experienced
coitus before they reached their late adolescence. Probably this represents a
much higher incidence than the average female. Kinsey and his co-workers (1953,
p. 288) found that only 3 per cent of their female sample had experienced coitus
by 15 years and 20 per cent had done so by 20 years. Undoubtedly the situation
is much changed today when probably most women have experienced coitus prior to
marriage, compared to Kinsey's 1950 sample of less than half. In any case, the
prostitute sample in this present study is extraordinarily diverse compared to
the other samples, and nowhere else in the other variables is there such a
differentiation. Therefore, some importance must be attached to this finding.
A high ratio of early coital experiences among prostitutes is not in itself
unique. Jennifer James (1979), Mimi Silbert (1982) and Nanette Davis (1971 )
all found that their respective samples of street and juvenile prostitutes had
undergone coital sex in early adolescence. One might assume that an early
coital experience is one of the predetermining factors in prostitution. But,
this does not explain it sufficiently for all prostitutes, given, for example,
that more than half of the sample followed the "normal" pattern of initial
intercourse in mid to late adolescence. The above mentioned researchers viewed
their samples' early coitus among the negative factors leading to prostitution.
Table 3.33 indicates the context in which the "loss" of virginity occurred.
Table 3.33 : Context of first coital experience of prostitutes, health-workers, students
| Context | Prostitutes (n=128) % | Health-workers (n=115) % | Students (n=120) % |
| Love affair | 42.20 | 53.90 | 43.30 |
| A casual encounter | 18.00 | 19.10 | 10.00 |
| With a friend | 18.70 | 13.90 | 10.90 |
| In marriage | 03.10 | 07.00 | 05.80 |
| Incestual contact | 06.20 | 00.00 | 00.80 |
| In rape | 10.20 | 00.90 | 05.00 |
| In prostitution | 00.00 | n/a | n/a |
| Not disclosed, or still virgins | 01.60 | 05.20 | 24.20 |
If we take the first four contexts listed in Table 3.33 as "positive"
experiences and incest and rape as "negative" experiences (not surprisingly, not
one of the prostitutes was a virgin on entering the sex industry), we can
clearly see that in most instances in all three samples the first intercourse
was in a "positive" context. Admittedly, the prostitutes have higher incidences
of "negative" contexts, but these are not sufficient to assume that early coital
experiences for prostitutes are mostly negative. Some people may express
surprise that four of the prostitutes adhered to the Christian ideal of
remaining virgins until marriage. Though positive in that it conforms to social
norms, as parlour worker Maggie points out in her own case, it may
not have been much of an experience at all:
I was 18 and I was a virgin when I got married. So it happened after I was
married. I had known him since I was seven and we had never played doctors and
nurses. I wish I had because I would have known what to expect, or rather, not
to expect. I remember thinking on our wedding night: "That was it? Oh, well,
seeing as he has gone to sleep, I suppose I might as well go to sleep too." We
had had no opportunity before marriage, perhaps a little bit of petting but
nothing else.
So, what can we make of the anomalous first coitus situation with the prostitute
sample? Probably, a large number of prostitutes (perhaps most but certainly as
many a half), undergo sexual (vaginal) intercourse in their early adolescence.
Perhaps these women are already advanced in maturity, with a psychologically
more mature attitude to sex than the average girl. That most of them initiated
the sexual encounter as a "positive" experience with a lover, a friend or chosen
casual acquaintance would indicate their greater preparation for coitus than
most other girls their age. That only a few of them had experienced a brutal or
"negative" coital experience, "loss" of virginity was a choice rather than a
misfortune. What is important here is that these girls initiated their "loss"
of virginity at a time when they were about to move into womanhood and economic
independence, and they were equipped with both the experience and the knowledge
of the value of sex as a commodity as well as an advanced knowledge of male
sexuality, much earlier than most other girls, who were still in awe of coitus
and males. In other words, prostitution was no longer an awesome and
frightening prospect as imagined by most other girls their age.
We have spoken much about sex and sexuality to date. We will now determine to
what extent prostitutes might differ to other women in the experience of love.
Are they as emotional and are they more likely to have more love partners in a
given time span than most other women? First, let us see if the prostitute
sample is as equally advanced in failing in love as they are in having achieved
first coitus. Table 3.34 compares the ages of three groups when falling in love
for the first time.
Table 3.34 : Age at onset of first love affair of prostitutes, health-workers, students
| Age | Prostitutes (n=128) % | Health-workers (n=115) % | Students (n=120) % |
| Under 15 years | 25.00 | 16.50 | 15.00 |
| 15-18 years | 47.60 | 47.80 | 53.40 |
| 18-20 years | 13.30 | 13.00 | 12.50 |
| 20-25 years | 04.70 | 13.90 | 05.80 |
| 25-30 years | 00.80 | 05.20 | 00.80 |
| 30-35 years | 00.80 | 00.00 | 00.00 |
| Over 35 years | 00.00 | 00.00 | 00.80 |
| Never been in love | 05.50 | 01.80 | 10.00 |
| Not disclosed | 02.30 | 01.80 | 01.70 |
Once again we find the prostitutes having experienced love
earlier than the other two groups, but only by a slight margin and
certainly much less of a margin than with initial coitus. In all three groups,
it seems, love was more often experienced without necessarily the accompaniment
of sex. In any case, love is a young person's experience, with 86 per cent of
the prostitutes, 77 per cent of the health-workers and 81 per cent of the
students having experienced love by the age of 20. If anything might be drawn
from these figures it is possibly that prostitutes might be slightly more
emotionally mature in early adolescence than most women. But, returning to
Table 3.32 it does suggest that curiosity about sex might be a stronger motive
for "losing" virginity among the prostitutes than as a outcome of falling in
love in early adolescence.
Most of the prostitutes interviewed seemed to have fallen in love for the first
time with boys one to three years their senior, and then fell out of love with
them within a year or two. In other words, it was a "puppy" kind of love, with
lots of passion and little substance. Jeanette is unusual in having married her
first lover. It was, incidentally, a marriage which at first was "made in
heaven":
My marriage was very much a love affair. He was a beautiful
lover, a wonderful man who gave me the guidelines to the way I am now,
considerate and soft in bed rather than passionate. He was nice and gentle,
easy and beautiful, and he made me feel that we were one the first time we made
love.
Jeanette was 16 and pregnant to him when she married him,
and he was then 25 years. Laura also fell in love for the first time at 16, but
the circumstance was very different, and, in fact, quite rare as
love affairs go:
He was the first boy I had ever kissed. He was very suave and
worldly, and 12 years older than me. But I would never have intercourse with
him because I became aware that he was my cousin. I gave him blow-jobs instead
and didn't consider that incest.
There was a wide assumption that prostitutes were girls who fell in love with
older, unscrupulous males, who often turned out to be pimps. Jeanette is such a
case. In spite of a marriage of bliss and sexual joy, her husband was anxious to
put her on the street still pregnant:
What he had put to me was that if I didn't work for him he would
bring all his friends from the hotel around to rape me. He gave me an hour to
think about this. I'll never forget it; I was so gullible, and you know what I
thought: it would be terrible for him because he had said it would be a terrible
thing for him to have to do to me.
Table 3.35 compares the age differences between the first lover and the woman for the three sample groups.
Table 3.35 : First lover's sex and age difference to prostitutes, health-workers, students
| | Prostitutes (n=121)* % | Health-workers (n=113)* % | Students (n=108)* % |
| Male, 10+ years younger | 00.80 | 00.00 | 00.00 |
| Male, 10-5 years younger | 01.60 | 00.00 | 00.00 |
| Male, 5-0 years younger | 01.60 | 03.50 | 00.90 |
| Male of same age | 27.30 | 40.70 | 44.50 |
| Male, 0-5 years older | 28.90 | 26.60 | 35.20 |
| Male, 5-10 years older | 24.00 | 10.60 | 08.30 |
| Male, 10+ years older | 05.80 | 04.40 | 03.70 |
| Female, 5+ years younger | 00.00 | 00.00 | 00.00 |
| Female, 5-0 years younger | 00.00 | 00.90 | 00.00 |
| Female of same age | 02.50 | 04.40 | 01.90 |
| Female, 0-5 years older | 02.50 | 01.80 | 00.90 |
| Female, 5-10 years older | 03.30 | 06.20 | 00.90 |
| Female, 10+ years older | 00.80 | 00.00 | 00.90 |
| Not disclosed | 00.80 | 00.90 | 02.80 |
| * Includes only those who have been in love. |
Regardless of the individual's sexual orientation in later adult life, some
lesbians, particularly among the health-workers, had males as first lovers.
What stands out, however, are the higher number of prostitutes with first lovers
more than five years their senior. Given that nearly three-quarters of them had
fallen in love by 18, this indicates that most of these love affairs consisted
of an adult male and an early to mid-adolescent girl. One might well be
persuaded by Greenwald's (1958) analysis of prostitutes in search of father
figures in these cases. However, since less than a third of the prostitutes
fall into this category not a great deal of weight should be attached to this
psychoanalytical assessment of prostitutes per se.
If we cannot assume that all of these cases of older men with teenage girls are
exploitative situations, some, at least, might be similar to Jeanette's
circumstance. Where these older men had led their adoring teenage girlfriends
into prostitution, naivety and a certain lack of maturity in love is apparent in
the women. So, while they may have achieved more experience in sexual matters
they were just as vulnerable as other young females in matters of love with
manipulating males. Overall, it seems that the prostitutes were more inclined
to fall for much older males than the other two groups. This may have been an
outcome of having earlier acquired greater sexual experience, with these women
looking for more mature men than boys their own age. However, over half of the
prostitutes fell in love with males around their own age or up to five years
older in their first love affairs, which is closer to the pattern for the other
two groups and most likely women in general. Once again, a myth about
prostitutes is brought asunder by empirical facts.
Another popular assumption about prostitutes claims that they are promiscuous in
their private and pre-prostitution lives. If this were true it would be
apparent in love affairs. Jennifer James (1979) found her sample of juvenile
street prostitutes to have been particularly casual with their first coital
partner. To measure this in the present study, the duration of the prostitutes'
first love affairs were assessed and compared to those of the other two sample
groups. Table 3.36 shows the result of this comparison.
Very little separates the three groups in this configuration. Slightly fewer
prostitutes had first love affairs of less than six months, but nearly
two-thirds of the prostitutes, nearly three-quarters of the health-workers and
over 80 per cent of the students ended their first love affairs in two or less
years, while more of the prostitutes had initial love affairs that lasted beyond
five years. This would indicate that the prostitutes were hardly fickle about
their first lovers, even if they had been with their first coital partners.
They were no more or less promiscuous as lovers than the other two groups. The
fact that less prostitutes managed to retain their first lovers beyond ten years
indicates that most likely the lovers were unable to maintain the relationship
after the women had taken up prostitution.
On the question of orgasmic experience a useful start might be the study of
Wardell Pomeroy (1965). He destroyed any previous notions about prostitutes as
being frigid, impassive, insensitive participants in prostitution. Pomeroy
compared three groups of prostitutes: 83 gaol inmates, presumedly mostly
ex-streetwalkers, with a median age of 30.3; 61 reformatory inmates, also mostly
ex-streetwalkers, with a median age of 19.5; and 31 call girls, with a median age
of 26.8. Although not truly representative of a prostitution population,
Pomeroy's findings in Table 3.37 provide sufficient indication that prostitutes
enjoy orgasmic experiences both at work and in private.
The configuration in Table 3.37 confirms the author's knowledge of prostitutes
in Australia, that is, prostitutes orgasm more frequently in their private
lives. The statement by some prostitutes that they never orgasm at work or they
fake orgasms to please their clients is probably true, but it is not the case
with a large number of women who seem capable of orgasms on the job. The
mistaken belief that female orgasm is an expression of affection often leads to
inhibitions with many prostitutes. Probable factors for explaining the
difference in sexual responses in Pomeroy's sample groups are age (Group 2 being
mostly teenagers) and class morality (Group 3 being mostly middle-class women).
Table 3.36 : Duration of first love affair of prostitutes, health-workers, students
| Duration | Prostitutes (n=121)* % | Health-workers (n=113)* % | Students (n=108)* % |
| Less than 6 months | 19.00 | 23.00 | 26.90 |
| 6 months to a year | 21.50 | 22.10 | 24.00 |
| 1-2 years | 22.30 | 27.40 | 29.60 |
| 2-5 years | 19.80 | 15.10 | 09.30 |
| 5-10 years | 13.20 | 05.30 | 02.80 |
| Over 10 years | 00.80 | 05.30 | 03.70 |
| Not disclosed | 03.30 | 01.80 | 03.70 |
| * Includes only those who have been in love. |
Table 3.37 : Orgasmic experiences of prostitutes
| Orgasmic experience | Group 1 (n=83) % | Group 2 (n=61) % | Group 3 (n=31) % |
| Never orgasms: At work | 21 | 18 | 23 |
| Never orgasms: In private | 1 | 9 | 10 |
| Spasmodically: One to five a week at work | 20 | 5 | 30 |
| Spasmodically: 26%-50% of time in private | 16 | 14 | 24 |
| Most frequently: Always at work | 14 | 23 | 7 |
| Most frequently: 51%-100% of time in private | 42 | 27 | 31 |
| Multiple orgasms: At work | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Multiple orgasms: In private | 27 | 45 | 28 |
| Source: Pomeroy 1965. |
Most of the prostitutes surveyed or interviewed admitted to experiences of
orgasm at work. Maggie's response to the question on orgasm reflects the most
common experience:
I orgasm more frequently outside of work. I think work is a part
of you, but you can't take your hormones for a walk. It all depends on the
other person.
Jeanette, too, says she orgasms much more frequently with
her husband, "almost every time", but it sometimes happens at work:
It's usually when I'm having French [cunnilingus] done to me, and sometimes
when I'm riding a guy especially if I've had lots of guys before. But, when I
feel I'm coming I'll generally switch off by thinking of the $20 I've just made
and work related things like that.
But there are those women who, for whatever psychological reason, orgasm more at
work than in their private lives. Laura is a case in point:
I actually orgasm more with work, perhaps once every 20 times. I
don't know why. Out of work I orgasm very seldom, about once a year.
Caroline also experiences orgasm more often at work:
I've only orgasmed outside work once in three years, apart from
one relationship in which I used to orgasm all the time. But at work I orgasm
about four times a month. It's very much tied up with my cycle and it's never
in sexual intercourse but always French [cunnilingus].
Call girl Katherine's response was the most unusual:
I never had an orgasm in my life up to the day I begun to work as
a prostitute. I probably have an orgasm in eight out of ten jobs. It's more
easy to have an orgasm the more ugly and unattractive the client is. It's
really made my sex life great. Because I'm much more in control in prostitution
than in usual social sex situations, I respond with greater and more frequent
orgasms.
The women working in bondage and discipline or fantasy work seem to be the least
inhibited. Marie, for instance, says she orgasms "about 90 per cent of the
time" in her private life, while at work ...
As often as I can. If I want to orgasm I just tell them [clients] what they
have to do to make me orgasm and they'll do it. But this depends on my mood:
sometimes three and four times in a session, sometimes once, and sometimes I
don't feel like it. I don't feel guilty about this. Why should I? I enjoy it
and it makes the job more pleasant.
Martine, who earlier explained her reasons for enjoying orgasms at work (p. 10),
went on to describe her motivations to orgasm in the context of her control over
the situation:
I try to orgasm every time I go to work, if possible, and if I'm
feeling randy. I usually bring myself on with a vibrator, or I make the clients
do oral sex on me. I don't orgasm as frequently at work as I do out of work
because I don't orgasm in every session.
These varied responses to the question of orgasm indicate the enormous sexual
diversity among prostitutes. As well as disintegrating the myth of the frigid
prostitute, it also indicates quite clearly once again the psychological and
social heterogeneity of women in a prostitute population. In some ways also,
the above studies are compatible with the wider research into female orgasmic
experiences. For instance, Pomeroy's (1965) samples of 9 per cent (Group 2) and
10 per cent (Group 3) never reaching orgasm in their private lives are similar
to 11 per cent of Kinsey's et al. (1953, pp. 252-4) female sample who had never
attained orgasm even after 20 years of marriage and 11.6 per cent of Shere
Hite's (1977, pp. 6045) female sample who never orgasm. However, certainly more
prostitutes attain more frequent orgasms in their private lives than Hite's
third of her sample who attained orgasm regularly with intercourse. Pomeroy's
sample also recorded a higher frequency of multiple orgasm than Kinsey's sample
of 14-15 per cent who did so regularly. The prostitutes in the present study
seemed to confirm Hite's general findings that oral and clitoral stimulation was
more likely to provide more frequent, spontaneous and satisfying (or intense)
orgasms. Overall, it seems that prostitutes can enjoy orgasms like most women.
Interestingly, while sex in their private lives results in more frequent
orgasmic experiences than with most women, that occurring in the context of work
is closer to the frequency in the general female population's most frequent
orgasmic experience (see, for example, Face to Face 1985, p. 275).
Turning now to the more negative aspects of prostitutes' sex lives, rape is one
of the most devastating experiences of women in general, and prostitutes, no
less than other women, sometimes fall victims outside of their workplace (the
incidence of rape at work will be dealt with later). Table 3.38 compares the
incidences of rape between the three sample groups.
Table 3.38 : Incidences of rape of prostitutes (beyond work), health-workers, students
| No. of incidents | Prostitutes (n=128) % | Health-workers (n=115) % | Student (n=120) % |
| Never | 53.10 | 79.10 | 88.30 |
| Once only | 21.10 | 13.90 | 07.50 |
| Twice | 13.30 | 04.30 | 01.70 |
| Three times | 07.00 | 00.90 | 00.00 |
| Four times | 00.00 | 00.00 | 00.80 |
| More than four times | 03.10 | 01.80 | 01.07 |
| Not disclosed | 02.30 | 00.00 | 00.00 |
The prostitutes were much more often raped than the other groups. Nearly a half
of them have been victims at one time or other in their private lives. One
researcher claimed that somehow rape victims precipitate rape by their
behaviour, demeanour or presence in unusual situations (Amir 1967b, p. 493 ff).
If this is the case, it might explain the reason for a higher ratio of
prostitute victims in everyday life, especially if these women, through their
actions or display, invite sexual interaction with nearby male strangers. This
would mean that off-duty prostitutes somehow disclose a desire for seduction, or
are ready for sex at any time. It does sound like a common notion of the
prostitute stereotype as "once a prostitute always a prostitute", in spite of
the evidence in this study so far indicating prostitutes as normal women and
their desires for normality in their private lives. It also sounds like a
Christian doctrinal judgment about women being naturally sinful and polluting as
objects of lust which is reinforced with a patriarchal notion of men at the
mercy of their own sexual weakness, preyed upon by "nymphettes", "temptresses",
and prostitutes, in particular. This kind of rationale has long been dismissed
by intelligent people in favour of the power thesis, best seen in Susan
Brownmilier's (1975) analysis of rape. This suggests that women are vulnerable
to men exercising power over women by means of violence. It may account for a
high incidence of prostitute rape victims in the context of work, but it cannot
be assumed that prostitutes are somehow more "sexier" or "saucier" in their
private lives, thereby feeding another popular male notion of women "asking for
it". What then does account for the higher incidences of rapes in the
prostitute sample given that they appear ordinary on their days off?
The answer to this might be found by investigating the nature of the
perpetrator. Table 3.39 reveals the result of this investigation.
Table 3.39 : Persons responsible for raping prostitutes, health-workers, students
| Relationship | Prostitutes (n=77)* % | Health-workers (n=27)* % | Students (n=19)* % |
| Husband or lover | 13.00 | 18.50 | 15.80 |
| A friend | 15.60 | 11.10 | 26.30 |
| Other person known to victim | 35.00 | 37.10 | 26.30 |
| Lone stranger | 22.10 | 18.50 | 26.30 |
| Pair or a pack | 14.30 | 14.80 | 05.30 |
| * Number of rapes (not number of women) per type of rapist. |
The configuration in this Table is similar in all groups: that is, most of the
women were raped by men known to them. In the case of the prostitutes this was
nearly two-thirds of the rapists. Amir (1967a), in a study of rape crimes in
Philadelphia in 1967, found that 48 per cent of the rapists were men in primary
relationships with the victims. Very likely this was only the tip of the
iceberg since many rapes by husbands, lovers and friends are never reported by
the victims, who, in these kinds of assaults, are more traumatised by feelings
of betrayal than by the physical violation. In 1987-88 nearly 9,000 crimes of
sexual assault were reported by police across Australia (Police Reports
1987-88). In 1983 a survey of rape victims found that only 24.7 per cent were
reported to police; many victims felt police would do nothing (Australian Bureau
of Statistics 1983). What all of this means is that the prostitutes were very
likely most often attacked by men who knew that they worked as prostitutes, and
the men assumed they had sexual access to them at any time, based on some
mistaken notion that whores have less rights than other women.
Another traumatic area in women's sex lives is abortion. Contrary to the
beliefs of many moralists, this is often accompanied by serious considerations,
guilt and a sense of loss. Prostitutes are no exception here. Table 3.40
compares the number of abortions experienced by the three sample groups.
Once more the prostitutes have a higher ratio of experiences than the other two
groups (although one might also assume that the health-workers are exceptionally
high for their age groups). Does this mean that the prostitutes take less
precautions against pregnancy, or that they simply have a higher number of sex
partners, thus increasing their vulnerability for pregnancy? Table 3.41
provides some of the answers to this by comparing the fathers of the aborted
foetuses.
Table 3.40 : Incidences of abortions of prostitutes, health-workers, students
| No. of incidents | Prostitutes (n=128) % | Health-workers (n=115) % | Students (n=120) % |
| No abortions | 43.80 | 66.90 | 80.00 |
| Once only | 27.30 | 20.00 | 10.90 |
| Twice | 14.80 | 05.20 | 05.80 |
| Three times | 07.80 | 04.30 | 02.50 |
| Four times | 02.40 | 00.90 | 00.00 |
| More than four times | 01.60 | 01.80 | 00.80 |
| Not disclosed | 02.30 | 00.90 | 00.00 |
Table 3.4l : Father(s) of aborted foetus of prostitutes, health-workers, students
| Relationship | Prostitutes (n=81)* % | Health-workers (n=43)* % | Students (n=25)* % |
| Husband | 12.40 | 25.60 | 12.00 |
| Lover | 51.80 | 62.80 | 72.00 |
| Casual acquaintance | 28.40 | 06.90 | 16.00 |
| A relative (incestual) | 02.50 | 00.00 | 00.00 |
| A rapist | 04.90 | 04.70 | 00.00 |
| * Number of abortions (not women) per type of father. |
In all three groups abortions occurred most often as a result of an unwanted
pregnancy with a lover, but the higher ratio of casual acquaintances as fathers
of the foetuses among the prostitutes most likely includes a number of clients.
As we will see, the high use of prophylaxis doubling as a contraceptive amongst
prostitutes at work keeps pregnancies to an absolute minimum, but the sheer
logistics of numbers of sexual partners and condom breakage in prostitution
means unwanted pregnancies are still feasible. This then could well be the
difference in abortions between prostitutes and other women.
What can we surmise from this statistical profile of the sex lives of
prostitutes? It seems that in most aspects little divides the prostitute sample
from the other two samples. However, there are a few areas which might be
highlighted due to significant differences. Although the prostitutes
experienced initial childhood sexual contact a little later then the
health-workers and students, as a group they were one or two years earlier in
experiencing their first sexual (vaginal) intercourse, which might be seen as a
predisposing factor for prostitution. However, contrary to most studies on
street and juvenile prostitutes, this experience among the more representative
sample of prostitutes was "positive" rather than "negative". This provided the
prostitutes with greater, more "mature" sexual experiences by mid-adolescence
than the other women, so that by late adolescence or early twenties they were
able to make more rational, pragmatic choices about their sexuality, including
prostitution as an option.
The prostitutes also slightly led the other women in other sexual experiences,
both "positive" and "negative", such as being victims of child sexual assaults,
failing in love earlier, having older male lovers in their first love affairs,
having longer first love affairs. And, it seems, that prostitutes have more
frequent orgasms than women generally. Since these are not excessively higher
incidences, the most that might be said is that prostitutes as sexual beings are
slightly more sexually experienced, sensual and libidinous in their
pre-prostitution sex lives than most other women. The fact that they are raped
more often in their private lives and have more abortions seems more closely
related to the fact that they are prostitutes rather than to their sensuality or
libido. None of this makes them abnormal in their sex lives; simply
extra-normal.
Conclusion
Most people today are inclined to accept the popular prostitute mythology. This
mythology is based on a mixture of past fact and fable and research which has
been ill-informed, biased towards one kind of prostitute or dependent upon
insufficient sampling. The persistence of the myths is due to Christianity's
need to perpetuate its object lessons. The result is an unjust indictment of a
group of women whose only crimes have been a promiscuous sexuality and an
economy based on supply and demand. But, in spite of more recent trends in
research and pleas for justice from some of society's more rational thinkers,
the myths continue to permeate beyond the popular throng to authority and
officialdom. Eileen McLeod noted prevailing attitudes among English parole
officers, people who had dealt with prostitutes for years, yet still treated
them with scorn:
The stereotyped view of street prostitutes at that time (mid
seventies) was that they were in some way inferior beings either
psychopathological, crude, brazen or a mixture of all these things... The
attitude among probation officers... was that if a woman was involved in
prostitution there must be something wrong with her - she must be
psychologically confused or mixed up, beaten by her father (McLeod
1982,pp.114,120).
With such askant notions widespread among officials on whom prostitutes must,
at some time or other, depend, these women are at a distinct disadvantage in our
bureaucratic and law bound society.
This Section has sought to remove these notions from the common consciousness by
refuting the myths with empirical facts. In the comparative study of
prostitutes, health-workers and university students we have seen that
prostitutes are not all working-class women, are not products of broken homes,
nor loveless, friendless people adrift on a sea of social isolation. Neither
were they more sexually active as children, nor significantly more often
sexually assaulted in childhood, and their earliest love affairs were not
considerably different to those of the other women. Their slightly higher
libidos and sensuality are not sufficient to warrant social ostracism, and
neither should they be regarded as especially different simply because they
enjoyed their first coital experience a year or two earlier than other women.
It is time society removed its tattered and worn blinkers and faced reality with
the same enthusiasm it had embraced earlier and much misguided research
findings. And it is time it realised the true significance of popular imagery
and the myths surrounding the sex industry.