Police diversion for cannabis offences: Assessing outcomes and cost-effectiveness

Abstract

Police diversion is widely utilised as an intervention for minor cannabis offending in Australia. This study compared the cost-effectiveness and outcomes of three kinds of diversions—cautions, expiation and warnings—with the traditional criminal justice system response of charging the offender. A sample of 998 people who had recently had contact with police for cannabis use or possession completed an online survey, with those who were diverted reporting reduced drug use and offending compared with those who were charged. The study supports previous findings that diversion for minor cannabis offences can save money and lead to better social consequences.

References

URLs correct as at September 2024

AIHW 2014a. Alcohol and other drug treatment and diversion from the Australian criminal justice system: 2012-13. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare

AIHW 2014b. National Drug Strategy Household Survey detailed report. Drug statistics series no. 28. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare

Baker J and Goh D 2004. The cannabis cautioning scheme three years on: An implementation and outcome evaluation. Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research

Bright DA & Matire KA 2012. Does coerced treatment of substance using offenders lead to improvements in substance use and recidivism? A review of the treatment efficacy literature. Australian Psychologist 48: 69–81

Copeland J, Frewen A & Elkins K 2009. Management of cannabis use disorder and related issues.  A clinician’s guide. https://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20130425211100/http://ncpic.org.au/ncpic/news/ncpic-news/article/management-of-cannabis-use-disorder-and-related-issues-a-clinicians-guide

Crime Research Centre 2007. WA Diversion Program–Evaluation Framework (POP/STIR/IDP) Final Report for the Drug and Alcohol Office. Perth University of Western Australia.

Dawe S, Loxton N, Hides L, Kavanagh D & Mattick R 2002. Review of diagnostic screening instruments for alcohol and other drug use and other psychiatric disorders (2nd Ed). Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing

Gossop M et al. 1995. The Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS): Psychometric Properties of the SDS in English and Australian Samples of Heroin, Cocaine and Amphetamine Users. Addiction 90: 607–614

Hughes C & Ritter A 2008. A summary of diversion programs for drug and drug-related offenders in Australia. DPMP Monograph no. 16. Sydney: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre

Hughes C, Shanahan M, Ritter A, McDonald D & Gray-Weale F 2014. Evaluation of the ACT drug diversion programs. DPMP Monograph no. 25. Sydney: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre

KPMG 2014. Evaluation of the Drug Court of Victoria. Magistrates’ Court of Victoria. https://www.mcv.vic.gov.au/news-and-resources/publications/evaluation-drug-court-victoria

Payne P, Kwiatkowski M & Wundersitz J 2008. Police drug diversion: a study of criminal offending outcomes. Research and Public Policy Series no. 97. Canberra: AIC. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/rpp/rpp97

Polk K, Adler C, Muller D & Rechtman K 2005. Early Intervention: Diversion and Youth Conferencing: A national profile and review of current approaches to diverting juveniles from the criminal justice system. Canberra: Australian Government Attorney-General’s Department

SCRCSP 2014. Report on Government Services, Volume C, Justice. Melbourne: Productivity Commission. https://www.pc.gov.au/ongoing/report-on-government-services

Shanahan M, Hughes C & McSweeney T Forthcoming. Australian police diversion for cannabis offences: Assessing program outcomes and cost-effectiveness. Canberra: National Drug Law Enforcement Fund. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/ndlerfmonograph/ndlerfmonograph66

Teesson M et al. 2012. Prevalence, correlates and comorbidity of DSM-IV Cannabis Use and Cannabis Use Disorders in Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 46: 1182–1192

Ubis Keys Young 2002. National review of tele counselling and web counselling services. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Branch

Wundersitz J 2007. Criminal justice responses to drug and drug-related offending: Are they working? Technical and Background Paper no. 25. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. No. 25. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tbp/tbp25