Antisocial behaviour during the teenage years: Understanding developmental risks

Abstract

Individuals are far more likely to engage in antisocial behaviour during adolescence than any other period of their life. This paper presents selected results from two studies which used secondary data analysis to provide a theoretically informed picture of youths’ decision-making process in relation to delinquency. Study 1 focused on changes in adolescents’ perceived rewards and delinquency involvement over four years. Results showed that high levels of perceived rewards go hand in hand with high levels of delinquency, but perceived antisocial rewards ‘topped out’ by age 14, suggesting that the best time to intervene is during early adolescence or late childhood. Study 2 focused on anger control. Youth who were highly delinquency-involved were especially likely to report surges in anger on days when they experienced a stressor, pointing to a need for delinquency prevention programs aimed at emotion control, including cognitive reappraisal. Improving these skills should enhance youths’ ability to navigate risk during the teenage years. 

References

Agnew R 2001. Building on the foundation of general strain theory: Specifying the types of strain most likely to lead to crime and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 38: 319–361 

Aguilar B, Sroufe LA, Egeland B & Carlson E 2000. Distinguishing the early-onset/persistent and adolescence-onset antisocial behavior types: From birth to 16 years. Development and Psychopathology 12: 109–132 

Australian Institute of Criminology (AIC) 2014. Australian crime: Facts & figures: 2013. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/facts/facts-14 

Berkowitz L 1990. On the formation and regulation of anger and aggression: A cognitive-neoassociationistic analysis. American Psychologist 45: 494–503 

Broidy LM 2001. A test of general strain theory. Criminology 39: 9–36 

Cauffman E & Steinberg L 2000. (Im)maturity of judgment in adolescence: Why adolescents may be less culpable than adults. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 18: 741–760 

Chassin L, Dmitrieva J, Modecki KL, Steinberg L, Cauffman E, Piquero AR et al. 2010. Does adolescent alcohol and marijuana use predict suppressed growth in psychosocial maturity among male juvenile offenders? Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 24: 48–60 

Drane CF, Modecki KL & Barber BL 2017. Disentangling development of sensation seeking, risky peer affiliation, and binge drinking in adolescent sport. Addictive Behaviors 66: 60–65 

Dubas JS, Graber JA & Petersen AC 1991. A longitudinal investigation of adolescents’ changing perceptions of pubertal timing. Developmental Psychology 27: 580–586 

Fine JG & Sung C 2014. Neuroscience of child and adolescent health development. Journal of Counseling Psychology 61: 521–527 

Fredricks JA & Eccles JS 2006. Is extracurricular participation associated with beneficial outcomes? Concurrent and longitudinal relations. Developmental Psychology 42: 698–713 

Landenberger NA & Lipsey MW 2005. The positive effects of cognitive–behavioral programs for offenders: A meta-analysis of factors associated with effective treatment. Journal of Experimental Criminology 1: 451–476 

Loughran TA, Piquero AR, Fagan J & Mulvey EP 2009. Differential deterrence: Studying heterogeneity and changes in perceptual deterrence among serious youthful offenders. Crime & Delinquency 58: 3–27 

Luciana M 2013. Adolescent brain development in normality and psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology 25: 1325–1345 

Modecki KL 2017. Adolescent development and clinical and legal implications, in Righthand S & Murphy WD (eds) The Safer Society handbook of assessment and treatment of adolescents who have sexually offended. Brandon VT: Safer Society Press: 1–24 

Modecki KL 2016. Do risks matter? Variable and person-centered approaches to adolescents’ problem behavior. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 42: 8–20 

Modecki KL 2009. “It’s a rush”: Psychosocial content of antisocial decision making. Law and Human Behavior 33: 183–193 

Modecki KL 2008. Addressing gaps in the maturity of judgment literature: Age differences and delinquency. Law and Human Behavior 32: 78–91 

Modecki KL, Barber BL & Eccles JE 2014. Binge drinking trajectories across adolescence: Extra-curricular activities are protective for youth with early pubertal development. Journal of Adolescent Health 54: 61–66 

Modecki KL, Barber BL & Vernon L 2013. Mapping developmental precursors of cyber-aggression: Trajectories of risk predict perpetration and victimization. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 42: 651–661 

Modecki KL & Mazza G 2017. Are we making the most of ecological momentary assessment data? A comment on Richardson, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, O’Donnell, Ling, & Staiger, 2017. Health Psychology Review 11: 295–297 

Modecki KL & Uink B 2018. Understanding antisocial behaviour during the teenage years: Developmental pathways of antisocial decision making among disadvantaged youth. Report to the Criminology Research Advisory Council. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/crg/reports/crg-1314-15 

Modecki KL & Uink B 2017. How can developmental psychopathology influence social and legal policy? Adolescence, mental health, and decision making, in Centifanti LC & Williams D (eds), The Wiley Handbook of Developmental Psychopathology. Wiley-Blackwell 

Modecki KL, Zimmer-Gembeck M & Guerra N 2017. Emotion regulation, coping and decision making: Three linked skills for preventing externalizing problems in adolescence. Child Development 88: 417–426 

Moffitt TE 2005. The new look of behavioral genetics in developmental psychopathology: Gene-environment interplay in antisocial behaviors. Psychological Bulletin 131: 533–554 

Moffitt TE 1993. Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review 100: 674–701 

Moffitt TE & Caspi A 2001. Childhood predictors differentiate life-course persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways among males and females. Development and Psychopathology 13: 355–375 

Moffitt TE, Caspi A, Harrington H & Milne BJ 2002. Males on the life-course-persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways: Follow-up at age 26 years. Development and Psychopathology 14: 179–207 

Monahan K , Steinberg L, Cauffman E & Mulvey EP 2009. Trajectories of antisocial behavior and psychosocial maturity from adolescence to young adulthood. Developmental Psychology 45: 1654–1668 

Nagin D & Paternoster R 2000. Population heterogeneity and state dependence: State of the evidence and directions for future research. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 16: 117–144 

Parsons JT, Siegel AW & Cousins JH 1997. Late adolescent risk-taking: Effects of perceived benefits and perceived risks on behavioral intentions and behavioral change. Journal of Adolescence 20: 381–392 

Piquero AR, Jennings WG & Farrington D 2013. The monetary costs of crime to middle adulthood: Findings from the Cambridge study in delinquent development. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 50: 53–74 

Plattner B, Karnik N, Booil J, Hall RE, Schallauer A, Carrion V, Feucht M & Steiner H 2007. State and trait emotions in delinquent adolescents. Child Psychiatry and Human Development 38: 155–169 

Rebellon CJ 2006. Do adolescents engage in delinquency to attract the social attention of peers? An extension and longitudinal test of the social reinforcement hypothesis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 43: 387–411 

Scott ES & Steinberg L 2008. Adolescent development and the regulation of youth crime. The Future of Children 18: 15–33 

Shulman EP & Cauffman E 2013. Reward-biased risk appraisal and its relation to juvenile versus adult crime. Law and Human Behavior 37: 412–423 

Simons RL, Chen YF, Stewart EA & Brody GH 2003. Incidents of discrimination and risk for delinquency: A longitudinal test of strain theory with an African American sample. Justice Quarterly 20: 827–854 

Smith AB, Halari R, Giampetro V, Brammer M & Rubiaa K 2011. Developmental effects of reward on sustained attention networks. Neuroimage 56: 1693–1704 

Steinberg L, Graham S, O’Brien L, Woolard J, Cauffman E & Banich M 2009. Age differences in future orientation and delay discounting. Child Development 80(1): 28–44 

Uink B, Modecki KL, Barber BL & Correia H 2018. Socioeconomically disadvantaged adolescents with elevated externalizing symptoms show heightened emotion reactivity to daily stress: An experience sampling study. Child Psychiatry and Human Development. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-018-0784-x 

Williams J, Toumbourou JW, McDonald M, Jones S & Moore T 2005. A sea change on the island continent: Frameworks for risk assessment, prevention and intervention in child health in Australia. Children & Society 19: 91–104