Exploring the implications of child sex dolls


The importation of child sex dolls into Australia has created increasing concerns. However, the implications of these products, and especially their link with child contact sexual offending, remain unclear. From a review of the literature, a number of possible negative impacts are suggested. Although currently unproven, it is possible that use of child sex dolls may lead to escalation in child sex offences, from viewing online child exploitation material to contact sexual offending. It may also desensitise the user from the potential harm that child sexual assault causes, given that such dolls give no emotional feedback. The sale of child sex dolls potentially results in the risk of children being objectified as sexual beings and of child sex becoming a commodity. Finally, there is a risk that child-like dolls could be used to groom children for sex, in the same way that adult sex dolls have already been used. There is no evidence that child sex dolls have a therapeutic benefit in preventing child sexual abuse.


All URLs correct as at April 2024

American Psychological Association, Task Force on the Sexualisation of Girls 2007. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualisation of Girls. Washington DC: American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/pi/women/programs/girls/report-full.pdf

Babchishin KM, Hanson K & Hermann CA 2011. The characteristics of online sex offenders: A metaanalysis. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 23(1): 92–123

Behrendt M 2018. Reflections on moral challenges posed by a therapeutic childlike sexbot. Love and sex with robots: Third international conference, LSW 2017. London: Springer International Publishing: 96–113

Boxall H, Tomison AM, Hulme S 2014. Historical review of sexual offence and child sexual abuse legislation in Australia: 1788–2013. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/special/special-7

Brown R & Bricknell S 2018. What is the profile of child exploitation material offenders? Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 564. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi564

Ciambrone D, Phua VC & Avery EN 2017. Gendered synthetic love: Real Dolls and the construction of intimacy. International Review of Modern Sociology 43(1): 59–78

Cohen-Almagor R 2013. Online child sex offenders: Challenges and counter-measures. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 52(2): 190–215

Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions 2016. Man in possession of child sex doll sentenced to imprisonment. Man who disseminated the child sex doll serves sentence by way of an intensive correction order. Media release 19 Aug. https://www.cdpp.gov.au/news/man-possession-child-sex-doll-sentenced-imprisonment

Cox-George C & Bewley S 2018. I, sex robot: The health implications of the sex robot industry. BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health 44(3): 161–164

Danaher J 2017. Should we be thinking about robot sex? in Danaher J & McArthur N (eds) Robot sex: Social and ethical implications. Cambridge MA: MIT Press Ltd: 3–14

Danaher J 2014. Robotic rape and robotic child sexual abuse: Should they be criminalised? Criminal Law and Philosophy 11(1): 71–95

Darling K 2016. Extending legal protection to social robots: The effects of anthropomorphism, empathy, and violent behaviour towards robotic objects, in Calo R, Froomkin AM & Kerr I (eds) Robot law. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar Publishing: 213–231

Davis N, Lennings C & Green T 2018. Improving practice in child sexual abuse image investigations through identification of offender characteristics. Sexual Abuse in Australia and New Zealand Jan: 1–12

Döring N & Pöschl S 2018. Sex toys, sex dolls, sex robots: Our under-researched bed-fellows. Sexologies 27(3): e51–e55

Eke AW, Seto MC & Williams J 2010. Examining the criminal history and future offending of child pornography offenders: An extended prospective follow-up. Law and Human Behaviour 35(6): 466–478

Facchin F, Barbara G & Cigoli V 2017. Sex robots: The irreplaceable value of humanity. BMJ (Online) 358: j3790. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j3790

Frank L & Nyholm S 2017. Robot sex and consent: Is consent to sex between a robot and a human conceivable, possible, and desirable? Artificial Intelligence Law 25(3): 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-017-9212-y

Fredrickson BL & Roberts TA 1997. Objectification theory: Towards understanding women’s lived experiences and metal health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly 21(2): 173-206

Gervais SJ & Eagan S 2017. Sexual objectification: The common thread connecting myriad forms of sexual violence against women. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 87(3): 226–232

GovTrack 2018. Summary of H.R. 4655: CREEPER Act of 2017. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/115/hr4655/summary

Gutiu SM 2016. The roboticisation of consent, in R Calo, AM Froomkin & I Kerr (eds) Robot law. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar Publishing: 186–212

Hatch L 2011. The American Psychological Association Task Force on the Sexualisation of girls: A review, update and commentary. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity 18(4): 195–211

Heath H 2016. Using/abusing fembots. Overland 225 (Summer): 70–76

Houtepen JABM, Sijtsema JJ & Bogaerts S 2014. From child pornography offending to child sexual abuse: A review of child pornography offender characteristics and risks for cross-over. Aggression and Violent Behaviour 19(5): 466–473

Howitt D & Sheldon K 2007. The role of cognitive distortions in paedophilic offending: Internet and contact offenders compared. Psychology, Crime & Law 13(5): 469–486

Langcaster-James M & Bentley GR 2018. Beyond the Sex Doll: Post-Human Companionship and the Rise of the ‘Allodoll’. Robotics 7(4): 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics7040062

Long ML, Alison LA and McManus MA 2012. Child pornography and likelihood of contact abuse: A comparison between contact child sexual offenders and noncontact offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 25(4): 370–395

Kwak SS, Yunkyung K, Kim E, Shin C & Cho K 2013. What makes people empathise with an emotional robot? The impact of agency and physical embodiment on human empathy for a robot. 22nd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. Gyeongji, Korea: IEEE ROMAN: 180–185

Levy D 2007. Love and sex with robots: The evolution of human-robot relationships. New York: Harper Collins

Li J 2015. The benefit of being physically present: A survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots and virtual agents. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 77(May): 23–37

Maras MH & Shapiro LR 2017. Child sex dolls and robots: More than just an uncanny valley. Journal of Internet Law 21(5): 3–21

Moen OM & Sterri AB 2018. Pedophilia and computer-generated child pornography, in Boonin D (ed), The Palgrave handbook of philosophy and public policy. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan: 369–382

Morin R 2011. Can child dolls keep pedophiles from offending? The Atlantic, 11 January 2011. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2016/01/can-child-dolls-keep-pedophiles-from-offending/423324/

Palermo GB & Farkas MA 2013. The dilemma of the sexual offender, 2nd ed. Springfield: Charles C Thomas

Prichard J & Spiranovic C 2014. Child exploitation material in the context of institutional child sexual abuse. Sydney: Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. https://nla.gov.au/nla.obj-2817033667/view

Quayle E & Taylor M 2003. Model of problematic internet use in people with sexual interest in children. Cyber Psychology and Behaviour 6(1): 93–106

Richardson K 2016. Slavery, the prostituted, and the rights of machines. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 35(2): 56–53

Richardson K 2015. The asymmetrical ‘relationship’: Parallels between prostitution and the development of sex robots. SIGCAS Computers and Society, 45(3): 290–293

Roos H 2014. Trading the sexual child: Child pornography and the commodification of children in society. Texas Journal of Women, Gender and the Law 23(2): 131–156

Rutkin A 2016. Could sex robots and virtual reality treat paedophilia? New Scientist, 2 Aug. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2099607-could-sex-robots-and-virtual-reality-treat-paedophilia/

Seto MC, Hanson KR & Babchishin KM 2011. Contact sexual offending by men with online sexual offenses. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 23(1): 124–145

Schell BH, Martin MV, Hung PCK, Rueda L 2006. Cyber child pornography: A review paper of the social and legal issues and remedies – and a proposed technological solution. Journal of Aggression and Violent Behaviour 12(1): 45–63

Scott K 2016. Petition to ban ‘child sex dolls’ gains traction, experts warn they could ‘reinforce’ paedophilic behaviour. ABC News, 24 Mar. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-03-22/petition-to-ban-child-sex-dolls-in-australia-gains-traction/7267114

Sharkey N, van Wynsberghe A, Robbins S & Hancock E 2017. Our sexual future with robots. The Hague, Netherlands: Foundation for Responsible Robotics. https://www.academia.edu/34062193/FRR_Consultation_Report_Our_Sexual_Future_with_robots_Final

Shaw D 2017. The ‘new phenomenon’ of child sex dolls. BBC News, 31 Jul. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-40776621

Simons D, Wurtele SK & Heil P 2002. Childhood victimisation and lack of empathy as predictors of sexual offending against women and children. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 17(12): 1291–1307

Sparrow R 2017. Robots, rape and representation. International Journal of Social Robotics 9(4): 465–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-017-0413-z

Strikwerda L 2017. Legal and moral implications of child sex robots, in Robot sex: Social and ethical implications. Cambridge MA: MIT Press Ltd: 133–152

Suzuki Y, Galli L, Ikeda A, Itakura S & Kitazaki M 2015. Measuring empathy for human and robot hand pain using electroencephalography. Scientific Reports 5: 15924. doi:10.1038/srep15924

Sydney Criminal Lawyers 2017. Child sex dolls: Promoting or preventing paedophilia? https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/child-sex-dolls-promoting-or-preventing-paedophilia/

Szczuka JM & Krämer NC 2017. Not only the lonely: How men explicitly and implicitly evaluate the attractiveness of sex robots in comparison to the attractiveness of women, and personal characteristics influencing this evaluation. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 1(3): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti1010003

Torjesen I 2017. Society must consider risks of sex robots, report warns. BMJ 358: j3267

Warren I & Palmer D 2010. Crime risks of three-dimensional virtual environments. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 388. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi388

Wolak J, Finkelhor D and Mitchell K 2012. Trends in arrests for child pornography possession: The third national juvenile online victimisation study (NJOV-3). Durham, New Hampshire: University of New Hampshire