Image-based sexual abuse: Victims and perpetrators


Image-based sexual abuse (IBSA) refers to the non-consensual creation, distribution or threatened distribution of nude or sexual images. This research examines the prevalence, nature and impacts of IBSA victimisation and perpetration in Australia. This form of abuse was found to be relatively common among respondents surveyed and to disproportionately affect Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, people with a disability, homosexual and bisexual people and young people. The nature of victimisation and perpetration was found to differ by gender, with males more likely to perpetrate IBSA, and females more likely to be victimised by a partner or ex-partner.


URLs correct as at April 2024

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) 2012. Personal Safety, Australia 2012. ABS cat. no. 4906.0. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.

Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) 2011. Report 3: The emerging mobile telecommunications service market in Australia. Communications Report 2010–11 Series. Canberra: ACMA

Baker R et al. 2010. Research synthesis AAPOR report on online panels. Public Opinion Quarterly 74(4): 711–781

Baumgartner SE, Valkenburg PM & Peter J 2010. Assessing causality in the relationship between adolescents’ risky sexual online behavior and their perceptions of this behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 39(10): 1226–1239

Borrajo E & Gámez-Guadix M & Calvete E 2015. Cyber dating abuse: Prevalence, context and relationship with offline dating aggression. Psychological Reports 116(2): 565–585

Branch K, Hilinski-Rosick CM, Johnson E & Solano G 2017. Revenge porn victimization of college students in the United States: An exploratory analysis. International Journal for Cyber Criminology 11(1): 128–142

Crofts T, Lee M, McGovern A & Milivojevic S 2015. Sexting and young people. London: Palgrave Macmillan

Cyber Civil Rights Initiative 2014. End revenge porn: A campaign of the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative.

Dir A & Cyders M 2015. Risks, risk factors, and outcomes associated with phone and internet sexting among university students in the United States. Archives of Sexual Behavior 44(6): 1675–1684

Drouin M, Ross J & Tobin E 2015. Sexting: A new, digital vehicle for intimate partner aggression? Computers in Human Behavior 50: 197–204

Englander E 2015. Coerced sexting and revenge porn among teens. Bullying, Teen Aggression & Social Media 1(2): 19–21

Flynn A, Henry N & Powell A 2016. More than revenge: Addressing the harms of revenge pornography. Melbourne: Monash University

Gámez-Guadix M, Almendros C, Borrajo E, & Calvete E 2015. Prevalence and association of sexting and online sexual victimization among Spanish adults. Sexuality Research and Social Policy 12(2): 145–154

Garcia JR et al. 2016. Sexting among singles in the USA: prevalence of sending, receiving, and sharing sexual messages and images. Sexual Health 13(5): 428–435

Gordon-Messer D, Bauermeister J, Grodziniski A & Zimmerman M 2013. Sexting among young adults. Journal of Adolescent Health 52: 301–306

Henry N, Flynn A & Powell A 2019. Responding to revenge pornography: The scope, nature and impact of Australian criminal laws. Report to the Criminology Research Advisory Council. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.

Klettke B, Hallford DJ & Mellor DJ 2015. Sexting prevalence and correlates: A systematic literature review. Clinical Psychology Review 34(1): 44–53

Lenhart A, Ybarra M & Price-Feeney M 2016. Nonconsensual image sharing: One in 25 Americans has been a victim of “revenge porn”. New York: Data & Society Research Institute, Center for Innovative Public Health Research.

Lounsbury K, Mitchell KJ & Finkelhor D 2011. The true prevalence of ‘sexting’. Durham, NH: Crimes Against Children Research Center.

Marganski A & Melander L 2018. Intimate partner violence victimization in the cyber and real world: Examining the extent of cyber aggression experiences and its association with in-person dating violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 33(7): 1071–1095

McAfee 2013. Lovers beware: Scorned exes may share intimate data and images online

McGlynn C & Rackley E 2017. Image-based sexual abuse. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 37(3): 534–561

McGlynn C, Rackley E & Houghton R 2017. Beyond ‘revenge porn’: The continuum of image-based sexual abuse. Feminist Legal Studies 25(1): 25–46

Mitchell KJ, Finkelhor D, Jones LM & Wolak J 2012. Prevalence and characteristics of youth sexting: A national study. Pediatrics 129(1): 13–20

Morelli M, Bianchi D, Baiocco R, Pezzuti L & Chirumbolo A 2016. Sexting, psychological distress and dating violence among adolescents and young adults. Psicothema 28(2): 137–142

Office of the eSafety Commissioner (OeSC) 2017. Image-based abuse national survey: Summary report. Melbourne: Office of the eSafety Commissioner.

Patrick K, Heywood W, Pitts M & Mitchell A 2015. Demographic and behavioural correlates of six sexting behaviours among Australian secondary school students. Sexual Health 12(6): 480–487

Powell A & Henry N 2017. Sexual violence in a digital age. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan

Powell A, Henry N & Flynn A 2018. Image-based sexual abuse, in WS DeKeseredy & M Dragiewicz (eds), Handbook of critical criminology. New York: Routledge

Powell A, Henry N, Flynn A & Scott A 2018. Image-based sexual abuse: The extent, nature, and predictors of perpetration in a community sample of Australian adults. Computers in Human Behavior.

Power to Decide (formerly National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy) 2008. Sex and tech: Results from a survey of teens and young adults.

Reed L, Tolman R & Ward M 2016. Snooping and sexting: Digital media as a context for dating aggression and abuse among college students. Violence Against Women 22(13): 1556–1576

Stanley et al. 2018. Pornography, sexual coercion and abuse and sexting in young people’s intimate relationships: A European study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 33(19): 2919–2944

Staude-Müller F, Hansen B & Voss M 2012. How stressful is online victimization? Effects of victim’s personality and properties of the incident. European Journal of Developmental Psychology 9(2): 260–274

Strohmaier H, Murphy M & DeMatteo D 2014. Youth sexting: Prevalence rates, driving motivations, and the deterrent effect of legal consequences. Sexuality Research and Social Policy 11(3): 245–255

Thompson MP & Morrison DJ 2013. Prospective predictors of technology-based sexual coercion by college males. Psychology of Violence 3(3): 233–246

UK Safer Internet Centre, Netsafe, University of Plymouth & Office of the eSafety Commissioner 2017. Young people and sexting: Attitudes and behaviours: Research findings from the United Kingdom, New Zealand and Australia.

Villacampa C 2017. Teen sexting: Prevalence, characteristics and legal treatment. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 49: 10–21

Wolak J & Finkelhor D 2016. Sextortion: Findings from an online survey about threats to expose sexual images. Durham, NH: Crimes Against Children Research Center.

Wood M, Barter C, Stanley N, Aghtaie N & Larkins C 2015. Images across Europe: The sending and receiving of sexual images and associations with interpersonal violence in young people’s relationships. Children and Youth Services Review 59: 149–160