Understanding the structure and composition of co-offending networks in Australia


A large volume of criminal offending involves two or more individuals acting collaboratively. In recent years, much contemporary research on group crime has integrated research on co-offending with the study of criminal networks. However, while this research (mostly from the United States and Canada) is generating significant insights into co-offending, there is a notable absence of research on co-offending and co-offending networks in Australia.

This report presents the findings of a study into co-offending using arrest data from Melbourne, Australia. The study sought to extend previous work on co-offending by analysing the range of crime types committed by individuals and co-offenders across co-offending networks.


URLs correct as at February 2024

Andresen MA & Felson M 2012. Co-offending and the diversification of crime types. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 56(5): 811–829

Australian Bureau of Statistics 2018. National Offence Index 2018. Canberra: ABS. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/classifications/national-offence-index/2018

Australian Bureau of Statistics 2011. Australia and New Zealand Standard Offence Classification 3rd ed. Canberra: ABS. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/classifications/australian-and-new-zealand-standard-offence-classification-anzsoc/2011

Bastomski S, Brazil N & Papachristos AV 2017. Neighborhood co-offending networks, structural embeddedness, and violent crime in Chicago. Social Networks 51: 23–29

Borgatti S, Everett M & Johnson JC 2013. Analyzing social networks. London: Sage

Bouchard M & Konarski R 2014. Assessing the core membership of a youth gang from its co-offending network. In C Morselli (ed), Crime and networks. New York: Routledge: 81–96

Brantingham PL, Ester M, Frank R, Glässer U & Tayebi MA 2011. Co-offending network mining. In UK Wiil (ed), Counterterrorism and open source intelligence. Lecture notes in social networks. Vienna: Springer: 73–102

Budd T, Sharp C & Mayhew P 2005. Offending in England and Wales: First results from the 2003 Crime and Justice survey. London: Home Office

Carrington PJ 2002. Group crime in Canada. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 44(3): 277–315

Felson M 2003. The process of co-offending. In MJ Smith & DB Cornish (eds), Theory for practice in situational crime prevention. New York: Criminal Justice Press: 149–168

Grund T & Morselli C 2017. Overlapping crime: Stability and specialization of co-offending relationships. Social Networks 51: 14–22

Hodgson B 2007. Co-offending in UK police recorded crime data. The Police Journal 80(4): 333–353

Iwanski N & Frank R 2014. The evolution of a drug co-arrest network. In C Morselli (ed), Crime and networks. New York: Routledge: 52–80

Lantz B 2019a. Co-offending and arrest: An examination of the ‘group hazard’ hypothesis. Crime & Delinquency. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1177/0011128719860837

Lantz B 2019b. Co-offending group composition and violence. Crime & Delinquency. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1177/0011128719834564

Lantz B 2018. The consequences of crime in company: Co-offending, victim-offender relationship, and quality of violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1177/0886260518786497

Lantz B & Hutchison R 2015. Co-offender ties and the criminal career: The relationship between co-offender group structure and the individual offender. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 52(5): 658–690

Lantz B & Ruback RB 2017a. A networked boost: Burglary co-offending and repeat victimization using a network approach. Crime & Delinquency 63(9): 1066–1090

Lantz B & Ruback RB 2017b. The relationship between co-offending, age, and experience using a sample of adult burglary offenders. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology 3(1): 76–97

McCarthy B, Hagan J & Cohen LE 1998. Uncertainty, cooperation, and crime: Understanding the decision to co-offend. Social Forces 77(1): 155–176

McGloin JM & Nguyen H 2014. The importance of studying co-offending networks for criminological theory and policy. In Morselli C (ed), Crime and networks. New York: Routledge: 13–27

McGloin JM & Piquero AR 2009a. ‘I wasn’t alone’: Collective behaviour and violent delinquency. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 42: 336–353

McGloin JM & Piquero AR 2009b. On the relationship between co-offending network redundancy and offending versatility. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 47(1): 63–90

McGloin JM, Sullivan CJ, Piquero AR & Bacon S 2008. Investigating the stability of co‐offending and co‐offenders among a sample of youthful offenders. Criminology 46(1): 155–188

Morselli C, Grund TU & Boivin R 2015. Network stability issues in a co-offending population. In G Bichler & A Malm (eds), Disrupting criminal networks: Network analysis in crime prevention. London: Lynne Rinner: 47–65

Morselli C & Roy J 2008. Brokerage qualifications in ringing operations. Criminology 46(1): 71–98

Ouellet M, Bouchard M & Charette Y 2019. One gang dies, another gains? The network dynamics of group persistence. Criminology 57: 5–33

R Core Team 2012. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing

Reiss, AJ 1988. Co-offending and criminal careers. Crime and Justice 10(1): 117–170

Reiss AJ & Farrington DP 1991. Advancing knowledge about co-offending: Results from a prospective longitudinal survey of London males. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 82(2): 360–395

Sarnecki J 2001. Delinquent networks: Youth co-offending in Stockholm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Sarnecki J 1990. Delinquent networks in Sweden. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 6(1): 31–50

Scott J 2012. Social network analysis. London: Sage

Terranova V, Vandiver D & Stafford M 2019. Likelihood of arrest for robberies, assaults, and sexual offences committed by group and lone offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1177/0886260519872308

Tillyer MS & Tillyer R 2019. Co-offending, violence, and situational moderators. Journal of Criminal Justice. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2019.101626

van Mastrigt SB & Carrington PJ 2014. Sex and age homophily in co-offending networks: Opportunity or preference? In C Morselli (ed), Crime and networks. New York: Routledge: 28–51

van Mastrigt SB & Farrington DP 2009. Co-offending, age, gender and crime type: Implications for criminal justice policy. British Journal of Criminology 49(4): 552–573

Warr M 1996. Organization and instigation in delinquent groups. Criminology 34(1): 11–37

Wasserman S & Faust K 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Volume 8 of Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Zimring FE 1981. Kids, groups and crime: Some implications of a well-known secret. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 72(3): 867–885