Enhancing evidence-based treatment of child sexual abuse material offenders: The development of the CEM-COPE Program

Photo of doctor and a patient in room

Recent research suggests that child sexual abuse material (CSAM) offenders have distinct characteristics and intervention needs when compared to contact sexual offenders. As such, many sexual offender treatment programs may not be suitable for CSAM offenders without a history of contact offences. This paper describes the development of the CEM-COPE (Coping with Child Exploitation Material Use) Program. We discuss CSAM offender characteristics, recidivism rates and treatment considerations, before outlining the rationale, specifications and underpinnings of the CEM-COPE Program. Challenges in this research area and considerations for future research are also addressed.


URLs correct as at February 2024

Andrews DA et al. 1990. Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology 28(3): 369–404

Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation nd. Homepage. https://www.accce.gov.au/

Babchishin KM, Hanson RK & VanZuylen H 2015. Online child pornography offenders are different: A meta-analysis of the characteristics of online and offline sex offenders against children. Archives of Sexual Behavior 44(1): 45–66

Babchishin KM, Merdian HL, Bartels RM & Perkins D 2018. Child sexual exploitation materials offenders: A review. European Psychologist 23(2): 130–143

Bonta J & Andrews DA 2017. The psychology of criminal conduct, 6th edition. New York: Routledge

County Court of Victoria 2017. Number of cases heard in relation to online child sexual exploitation offences for calendar year 2016 [unpublished data]

Craig LA, Beech A & Harkins L 2009. The predictive accuracy of risk factors and frameworks. In A Beech, L Craig & K Browne (eds), Assessment and treatment of sex offenders: A handbook. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd: 53–74

Dervley R, Perkins D, Whitehead H, Bailey A, Gillespie S & Squire T 2017. Themes in participant feedback on a risk reduction programme for child sexual exploitation material offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression 23(1): 46–61

Eke AW, Helmus LM & Seto MC 2019. A validation study of the Child Pornography Offender Risk Tool (CPORT). Sexual Abuse 31(4): 456–476

Elliott IA, Mandeville-Norden R, Rakestrow-Dickens J & Beech A 2019. Reoffending rates in a U.K. Community sample of individuals with convictions for indecent images of children. Law and Human Behavior 43(4): 369–382

Gannon TA, Olver ME, Mallio JS & James M 2019. Does specialized psychological treatment for offending reduce recidivism? A meta-analysis examining staff and program variables as predictors of treatment effectiveness. Clinical Psychology Review 73 (November): Article 101752

Gelb K 2007. Recidivism of sex offenders: Research paper. Melbourne: Sentencing Advisory Council. https://www.sentencingcouncil.vic.gov.au/publications/recidivism-of-sex-offenders-research-paper

Gewirtz-Meydan A, Walsh W, Wolak J & Finkelhor D 2018. The complex experience of child pornography survivors. Child Abuse & Neglect 80 (June): 238–248

Gillespie SM, Bailey A, Squire T, Carey ML, Eldridge HJ & Beech AR 2018. An evaluation of a community-based psycho-educational program for users of child sexual exploitation material. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 30(2): 169–191

Henshaw M, Arnold C, Darjee R, Ogloff JRP & Clough JA 2019. CEM-COPE Program: Theoretical and facilitation manual. Melbourne: Swinburne University of Technology

Henshaw M, Darjee R & Clough JA 2020. Online child sexual offending. In I Bryce & W Petherick (eds), Childhood sexual abuse: Forensic issues in evidence, impact, and management. London: Elsevier: 85–108

Henshaw M, Ogloff JRP & Clough JA 2018. Demographic, mental health, and offending characteristics of online child exploitation material offenders: A comparison with contact‐only and dual sexual offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 36(2): 198–215

Henshaw M, Ogloff JRP & Clough JA 2017. Looking beyond the screen: A critical review of the literature on the online child pornography offender. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 29(5): 416-445

Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service 2018. iHorizon Facilitation Manual. UK: Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service

Institute of Sexology and Sexual Medicine 2019. Trouble Desire – About. https://troubled-desire.com/en/about.html

Krone T & Smith RG 2017. Trajectories in online child sexual exploitation offending in Australia. Trends and issues in criminal justice no. 524. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi524

Lucy Faithfull Foundation 2019. Stop It Now! UK & Ireland. https://www.stopitnow.org.uk/

Magaletta PR, Faust E, Bickart W & McLearen AM 2014. Exploring clinical and personality characteristics of adult male Internet-only child pornography offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 58(2): 137–153

Magistrates’ Court of Victoria 2017. Cases with at least one offence finalised in the Magistrates’ Court for the calendar 2016 [unpublished data]

Middleton D, Elliott IA, Mandeville-Norden R & Beech AR 2006. An investigation into the applicability of the Ward and Siegert Pathways Model of child sexual abuse with internet offenders. Psychology, Crime & Law 12(6): 589–603

Middleton D, Mandeville-Norden R & Hayes E 2009. Does treatment work with internet sex offenders? Emerging findings from the Internet Sex Offender Treatment Programme (i-SOTP). Journal of Sexual Aggression 15(1): 5–19

Niveau G 2010. Cyber-pedocriminality: Characteristics of a sample of internet child pornography offenders. Child Abuse & Neglect 34(8): 570–575

Perkins D, Merdian H, Schumacher B, Bradshaw H & Stevanovic J 2018. Interventions for perpetrators of online child sexual exploitation: A scoping review and gap analysis. Child Sexual Exploitation Perpetrators Research Programme, Report 5. UK: Centre of Expertise on Child Sexual Abuse. https://www.csacentre.org.uk/documents/online-cse-interventions/

Pullman LE, Stephens S & Seto MC 2016. A motivation-facilitation model of adult male sexual offending. In CA Cuevas & CM Rennison (eds), The Wiley handbook on the psychology of violence. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons: 482–500

Seto MC 2013. Internet sex offenders. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association

Seto MC & Eke AW 2015. Predicting recidivism among adult male child pornography offenders: Development of the child pornography offender risk tool (CPORT). Law and Human Behavior 39(4): 416–429

Seto MC, Hanson RK & Babchishin KM 2011. Contact sexual offending by men with online sexual offenses. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 23(1): 124–145

Surjadi B, Bullens R, van Horn J & Bogaerts S 2010. Internet offending: Sexual and non-sexual functions within a Dutch sample. Journal of Sexual Aggression 16(1): 47–58

Victoria Police 2014. Offences recorded by offence code 2004/05 - 2013/14 [data file]. https://www.crimestatistics.vic.gov.au/crime-statistics/historical-crime-data/victoria-police-crime-statistics-publications-and-tables

Webb L, Craissati J & Keen S 2007. Characteristics of internet child pornography offenders: A comparison with child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 19(4): 449–465

Winder B & Gough B 2010. “I never touched anybody—that’s my defence”: A qualitative analysis of internet sex offender accounts. Journal of Sexual Aggression 16(2): 125–141