Criminal justice responses to child sexual abuse material offending: A systematic review and evidence and gap map

Camera lens photo

This report provides the world’s first systematic review of criminal justice responses to child sexual abuse material (CSAM) offending. The systematic search identified 20,820 records, yielding eight eligible impact evaluations. Six studies focused on policing and two on the judicial arm of the criminal justice system. No correctional impact evaluations met our inclusion criteria.

We qualitatively synthesise the evidence and use an evidence and gap map to visualise the current state of the evaluation evidence. Future research needs to prospectively design and rigorously evaluate evidence-informed interventions that are specifically tailored to CSAM offending.


URLS correct as at November 2020

Alison L et al. 2012. When do we believe experts? The power of the unorthodox view. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 30(6): 729–748

Babchishin KM, Hanson RK & Hermann CA 2015. The characteristics of online sex offenders: A meta-analysis. Sexual Abuse 23(1): 92–123

Baines V 2019. Online child sexual exploitation: Towards an optimal international response. Journal of Cyber Policy 4(2): 197–215

Balfe M, Gallagher B, Masson H, Balfe S, Brugha R & Hackett S 2015. Internet child sex offenders’ concerns about online security and their use of identity protection technologies: A review. Child Abuse Review 24(6): 427–439

Beech AR, Elliott IA, Birgden A & Findlater D 2008. The internet and child sexual offending: A criminological review. Aggression and Violent Behavior 13(2008): 216–228

Beier KM 2016. Proactive strategies to prevent child sexual abuse and the use of child abuse images: Experiences from the German Dunkelfeld Project. In H Kury Redo S & Shea (eds), Women and Children as Victims and Offenders: Background, prevention, reintegration. Switzerland: Springer: 400–524

Bentley H et al. 2019. How safe are our children? 2019. London: National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children

Bourke ML et al. 2015. The use of tactical polygraph with sex offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression 21(3): 354–367

Brady PQ 2017. Crimes against caring: Exploring the risk of secondary traumatic stress, burnout, and compassion satisfaction among child exploitation investigators. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology 32(4): 305–318

Brennan M et al. 2019. Best practice in the management of online sex offending. Plymouth: International Working Group for the Prevention of Online Sex Offending

Brown R & Bricknell S 2018. What is the profile of child exploitation material offenders? Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 564. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.

Buzzell T 2007. The effects of organisational and community context on local prosecution of computer child pornography cases. Criminal Justice Studies 20(4): 391­–405

Canadian Centre for Child Protection (CCCP) 2017. Survivors’ survey: Executive summary 2017. Winnipeg, Manitoba: CCCP

Carr J 2017. A brief history of child safety online: Child abuse images on the internet. In J Brown (ed), Online risk to children: Impact, protection and prevention. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons: 5–22

Cohen MI, Edberg MC & Gies SV 2011. Final report on the evaluation of the SAGE Project’s LIFESKILLS and GRACE Programs.’s-lifeskills-and-grace-programs

Cohen-Almagor R 2013. Online child sex offenders: Challenges and countermeasures. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 52(2): 190–215

Davidson J et al. 2020. Exploring policing and industry practice in the prevention of online child sexual abuse. In I Bryce & W Petherick (eds), Child sexual abuse: Forensic issues in evidence, impact, and management. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Academic Press: 657–677

Davidson J et al. 2017. Enhancing police and industry practice: EU child online safety project.…

Davidson J et al. 2011. Online abuse: Literature review and policy context. European Online Grooming Project.…

Davidson J et al. 2009. Evaluation of CEOP ThinkUKnow internet safety programme and exploration of young people’s internet safety knowledge.

Davidson J & Martellozzo E 2008. Protecting vulnerable young people in cyberspace from sexual abuse: Raising awareness and responding globally. Police Practice and Research 9(4): 277–289

DeMarco J, Sharrock S, Crowther T & Barnard M 2018. Behaviour and characteristics of perpetrators of online-facilitated child sexual abuse and exploitation: A rapid evidence assessment. London: NatCen Social Research.…

Dervley R, Perkins D, Whitehead H, Bailey A, Gillespie S & Squire T 2017. Themes in participant feedback on a risk reduction programme for child sexual exploitation material offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression 23(1): 46–61

Dombert B et al. 2016. How common is men’s self-reported sexual interest in prepubescent children? Journal of Sex Research 53(2): 214–223

Dooley J, Thomas L, Falconer S, Cross D & Waters S 2011. Educational evaluation of Cybersmart Detectives: Final report: Presented to the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA). Perth: Child Health Promotion Centre, Edith Cowan University.

Farrington DP 2003. Methodological quality standards for evaluation research. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 587(1): 49–68

Fortin F & Proulx J 2019. Sexual interests of child sexual exploitation material (CSEM) consumers: Four patterns of severity over time. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 63(1): 55–76

Gallo A 2020. Treatment for non-contact sexual offenders: What we know and what we need. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity 27: 149–163.

Garrington C, Rickwood D, Chamberlain P & Boer DP 2018. A systematic review of risk variables for child abuse material offenders. Journal of Forensic Practice 20(2): 91–101

Gewirtz-Meydan A, Walsh W, Wolak J & Finkelhor D 2018. The complex experience of child pornography survivors. Child Abuse & Neglect 80(2018): 238–248

Gillespie SM et al. 2018. An evaluation of a community-based psycho-educational program for users of child sexual exploitation material. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 30(2): 169–191

Greijer S & Doek J 2016. Terminology guidelines for the protection of children from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse.

Haasz A 2016. Underneath it all: Policing international child pornography on the dark web. Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce 43(2): 353–380

Hanson E 2017. The impact of online sexual abuse on children and young people. In J Brown (ed), Online risk to children: Impact, protection and prevention. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons: 97–122

Henshaw M, Darjee R & Clough J 2020. Online child sexual offending. In I Bryce & W Petherick (eds), Child sexual abuse: Forensic issues in evidence, impact, and management. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Academic Press: 85–108

Henshaw M, Ogloff J & Clough J 2018. Demographic, mental health, and offending characteristics of online child exploitation material offenders: A comparison with contact-only and dual sexual offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 36: 198–215

Henshaw M, Ogloff J & Clough J 2017. Looking beyond the screen: A critical review of the literature on the online child pornography offender. Sexual Abuse 29(5): 416–445

Higginson A & Neville R 2014. SysReview [Systematic Review Management Software]. Brisbane, Australia: University of Queensland

Houtepen JABM, Sijtsema JJ & Bogaerts S 2014. From child pornography offending to child sexual abuse: A review of child pornography offender characteristics and risks for cross-over. Aggression & Violent Behavior 19(2014): 466–473

Internet Watch Foundation 2020. The why, the how, the who and the results: The Internet Watch Foundation annual report 2019. Cambridge, UK: Internet Watch Foundation

Krone T 2004. A typology of online child pornography offending. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 279. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.

Krone T et al. 2020. Child sexual abuse material in child-centred institutions: Situational crime prevention approaches. Journal of Sexual Aggression 26(1): 91–110

Krone T & Smith RG 2017. Trajectories in online child sexual exploitation offending in Australia. Trends & Issues in crime and criminal justice no. 524. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.

Liberati A et al. 2009. The PRISMA Statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine 151: W65–W94

Lilley C 2017. UK Policy responses and their international relevance. In J Brown (ed), Online risk to children: Impact, protection and prevention. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons: 189–215

Ly T, Dwyer RG & Fedoroff JP 2018. Characteristics and treatment of internet child pornography offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 36(2): 216–234

Marcum CD, Higgins GE, Freiburger TL & Ricketts ML 2010. Policing possession of child pornography online: Investigating the training and resources dedicated to the investigation of cybercrime. International Journal of Police Science & Management 12(4): 516–525

Marcum CD, Higgins GE, Ricketts ML & Freiburger TL 2011. An assessment of the training and resources dedicated nationally to investigation of the production of child pornography. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 5(1): 23–32

Martellozzo E 2013. Online child sexual abuse: Grooming, policing and child protection in a multimedia world. New York: Routledge

McKibbin G, Humphreys C & Hamilton B 2017. “Talking about child sexual abuse would have helped me”: Young people who sexually abused reflect on preventing harmful sexual behavior. Child Abuse & Neglect 70 (August): 210–221

Merdian HL, Curtis C, Thakker J, Wilson N & Boer DP 2013. The three dimensions of online child pornography offending. Journal of Sexual Offending 19(1): 121–132

Merdian HL, Perkins DE, Dustagheer E & Glorney E 2020. Development of a case formulation model for individuals who have viewed, distributed, and/or shared child sexual exploitation material. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 64: 1055–1073.

Middleton D, Mandeville-Norden R & Hayes E 2009. Does treatment work with internet sex offenders? Emerging findings from the Internet Sex Offender Treatment Programme (i-SOTP). Journal of Sexual Aggression 15(1): 5–19

National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC) 2019. Captured on film: Survivors of child sex abuse material are stuck in a unique cycle of trauma. Alexandria, Virginia: NCMEC

National Research Council 2013. Confronting commercial sexual exploitation and sex trafficking of minors in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Neto ACA, Eyland S, Ware J, Galouzis J & Kevin M 2013. Internet sexual offending: Overview of potential contributing factors and intervention strategies. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 20(2): 168–181

Peersman C, Schulze C, Rashid A, Brennan M & Fischer C 2016. iCOP: Live forensics to reveal previously unknown criminal media on P2P networks. Digital Investigation 18(2016): 50–64

Perkins D, Merdian H, Schumacher B, Bradshaw H & Stevanovic J 2018. Interventions for perpetrators of online child sexual exploitation: A scoping review and gap analysis. Child sexual exploitation perpetrators research programme, report 5. Ilford: Centre of Expertise on Child Sexual Abuse

Proeve MJ & Wolf G 2019. Professional reports for sentencing courts: Recommendations for reporting on child exploitation material offenders' risk of recidivism and prospects for rehabilitation. Psychiatry, Psychology & Law 26(6): 868–885

Quayle E & Koukopoulos N 2018. Deterrence of online child sexual abuse and exploitation. Policing 13(3): 345–362

Seto MC, Buckman C, Dwyer RG & Quayle E 2018. Production and active trading of child sexual exploitation images depicting identified victims. Alexandria, Virginia: National Center for Missing & Exploited Children

Seto MC et al. 2015. Viewing child pornography: Prevalence and correlates in a representative community sample of young Swedish men. Archives of Sexual Behavior 44(2015): 67–79

Shadish WR, Cook TD & Campbell DT 2002. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin

Simon J, Luetzow A & Conte JR 2020. Thirty years of the convention on the rights of the child: Developments in child sexual abuse and exploitation. Child Abuse & Neglect. Advance online publication.

Smallbone S & Wortley R 2017. Preventing child sexual abuse online. In J Brown (ed), Online risk to children: Impact, protection and prevention. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons: 143–162

Snilstveit B, Vojtkova M, Bhavsar A, Stevenson J & Gaarder M 2016. Evidence and gap maps: A tool for promoting evidence informed policy and strategic research agendas. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 79: 120–129

Soldino V, Carbonell-Vayá EJ & Seigfried-Spellar KC 2019. Criminological differences between child pornography offenders arrested in Spain. Child Abuse & Neglect 98.

Steel CMS, Newman E, O’Rourke S & Quayle E 2020. A systematic review of cognitive distortions in online child sexual exploitation material offenders. Aggression & Violent Behavior 51.

Steely M, Bensel TT, Bratton T & Lytle R 2018. All part of the process? A qualitative examination of change in online child pornography behaviors. Criminal Justice Studies 31(3): 279–296

Sydes M, Eggins E & Mazerolle L 2018. What works in corrections? A review of the evaluation literature. Brisbane: Queensland Corrective Services

Tener D, Wolak J & Finkelhor D 2015. A typology of offenders who use online communications to commit sex crimes against minors. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma 24(3): 319–337

US Department of Justice 2016. National strategy for child exploitation prevention and interdiction: A report to congress.

von Weiler J, Haardt-Becker A & Schulte S 2010. Care and treatment of child victims of child pornographic exploitation (CPE) in Germany. Journal of Sexual Aggression 16(2): 211–222

Wager N et al. 2018. Rapid evidence assessment: Quantifying the extent of online-facilitated child sexual abuse: Report for the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse.…

Weisburd D 2000. Randomised experiments in criminal justice policy: Prospects and problems. Crime & Delinquency 46(2): 181–193

Wells M 2003. Law enforcement dilemmas in the investigation of internet sex crimes against minors (Doctoral thesis). University of New Hampshire, Durham, UK

White C et al. 2018. “Tell, tell, tell again”: The prevalence and correlates of young children’s response to and disclosure of an in-vivo lure from a stranger. Child Abuse & Neglect 82: 134–143

Wild T, Fromberger P, Jordan K, Müller I & Müller J 2019. Web-based health services in forensic psychiatry: A review of the use of the internet in the treatment of child sexual abusers and child sexual exploitation material offenders. Frontiers in Psychiatry 9: 763

Wortley R & Smallbone S 2012. Internet child pornography: Causes, investigation, and prevention. Santa Barbara, California: Praeger