Live streaming of child sexual abuse: An analysis of offender chat logs

Mobile phone used for sending messages
Abstract

Live streaming of child sexual abuse presents challenges for law enforcement and policy development. This study analysed chat logs from seven offenders who watched and directed the sexual abuse of 74 children (mostly in the Philippines) via live stream. The study found that offenders paid facilitators and victims very small amounts of money (median A$51) to view the sexual abuse of children, and used mainstream messaging and video platforms (eg Facebook) to communicate and transmit the abusive materials.

Two key factors emerged from this study that present potential points for intervention and disruption: payment characteristics (such as price ranges and the use of remittance services) and messaging platforms where offenders view CSA live streaming.

References

Açar KV 2017. Webcam child prostitution: An exploration of current and futuristic methods of detection. International Journal of Cyber Criminology 11(1): 98–109. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.495775

Balfe M et al. Internet child sex offenders’ concerns about online security and their use of identity protection technologies: A review. Child Abuse Review 24: 427–439. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2308

Brown A 2016. Safe from harm: Tackling webcam child sexual abuse in the Philippines: Challenges protecting vulnerable children and prosecuting their abusers. UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/stories/safe-from-harm-tackling-webcam-child-sexual-abuse-philippines

Brown R, Napier S & Smith RG 2020. Australians who view live streaming of child sexual abuse: An analysis of financial transactions. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 589. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti04336

Charmaz K & Belgrave L 2012. Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In J Gubrium, J Holstein, A Marvasti & K McKinney (eds), The Sage handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage: 347–365

Chudnovsky S & Reddy P 2015. Introducing video calling in Messenger. Facebook, 27 April. https://about.fb.com/news/2015/04/introducing-video-calling-in-messenger/

de Tribolet-Hardy F, Hill A & Habermeyer E 2020. ‘Webcam child sexual abuse’. A new facet of internet sex delinquency assessment. Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie 14: 259–269

DeHart D, Dwyer G, Seto MC, Moran R, Letourneau E & Schwarz-Watts D 2017. Internet sexual solicitation of children: a proposed typology of offenders based on their chats, e-mails, and social network posts. Journal of Sexual Aggression 23(1): 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2016.1241309

Dushi D 2020. Combating the live-streaming of child sexual abuse and sexual exploitation: A need for new legislation. In J Hunsinger, M Allen & L Klastrup (eds), Second international handbook of internet research. Dordrecht: Springer: 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1555-1_43

ECPAT International 2018. Trends in online sexual abuse material. Bangkok: ECPAT International

ECPAT International 2017. Online child sexual exploitation: An analysis of emerging and selected issues. ECPAT International Journal 12: 1–63

EFC—see European Financial Coalition against Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children Online

European Financial Coalition against Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children Online (EFC) 2015. Strategic assessment 2014. Europe: EFC. https://www.europol.europa.eu/publications-documents/commercial-sexual-exploitation-of-children-online

Europol 2020a. IOCTA 2020: Internet organised crime threat assessment. The Hague: Europol https://www.europol.europa.eu/iocta-report

Europol 2020b. Exploiting isolation: Offender and victims of online child sexual abuse during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Hague: Europol. https://www.europol.europa.eu/publications-documents/exploiting-isolation-offenders-and-victims-of-online-child-sexual-abuse-during-covid-19-pandemic

Europol 2019. IOCTA 2019: Internet organised crime threat assessment. The Hague: Europol

Glaser B 1978. Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley: Sociology Press

Halsey M & Deegan S 2012. Father and son: Two generations through prison. Punishment & Society 14(3): 338–367

Hunter F 2019. Encryption can’t put tech giants beyond the reach of the law, Minister says. The Sydney Morning Herald. 11 December. https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/encryption-can-t-put-tech-giants-beyond-the-reach-of-the-law-minister-says-20191211-p53ize.html

International Justice Mission 2020. Online sexual exploitation of children in the Philippines: Analysis and recommendations for governments, industry and civil society: Summary report. https://www.ijm.org/vawc/blog/osec-study

Internet Watch Foundation 2018. Trends in child sexual exploitation: Examining the distribution of captures of live-streamed child sexual abuse. Cambridge, UK: Internet Watch Foundation. https://www.iwf.org.uk/resources/research

Kloess JA et al. 2017. A qualitative analysis of offenders’ modus operandi in sexually exploitative interactions with children online. Sexual Abuse 29(6): 563–591. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063215612442

Kuhlmann DF & Aurén S 2015. Nipa huts with high speed Internet: Commercial exploitation of children in the 21st century, a qualitative investigation of webcam child prostitution in the Philippines (Doctoral thesis). Lund University, Sweden

Leclerc B et al. 2021. Child sexual abuse material on the darknet: A script analysis of how offenders operate. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 627. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti78160

McGrath M, Cann S & Konopasky R 1998. New measures of defensiveness, empathy, and cognitive distortions for sexual offenders against children. Sexual Abuse 10(1): 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906329801000104

McManus MA, Almond L, Cubbon B, Boulton L & Mears I 2016. Exploring the online communicative themes of child sex offenders. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling 13(2): 166–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1450

Netclean 2019. Netclean report 2019: A report about child sexual abuse crime. Gothenberg: Netclean. https://www.netclean.com/the-netclean-report/

Philippines Statistics Authority (PSA) 2018. Updated 2015 and 2018 full year official poverty statistics. Quezon City, Philippines: PSA. https://psa.gov.ph/poverty-press-releases/nid/162559

QSR International 2014. NVivo (Version 10). Melbourne: QSR International. https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home

Tan L & Grace RC 2008. Social desirability and sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse 20(1): 61–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063208314820

Taylor M, Holland G & Quayle E 2001. Typology of paedophile picture collections. Police Journal 74(2): 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032258X0107400202

Terre des Hommes 2013. Webcam child sex tourism: Becoming Sweetie: A novel approach to stopping the global rise of webcam child sex tourism. The Hague: Terre des Hommes. https://www.terredeshommes.org/webcam-child-sex-tourism-2/

Thornberg R & Charmaz K 2013. Grounded theory and theoretical coding. In U Flick (ed), The Sage handbook of qualitative data analysis. Sage: 153–169. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243.n11

Urquhart C 2012. Grounded theory for qualitative research: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks: Sage

Williams R, Elliott IA & Beech AR 2013. Identifying sexual grooming themes used by internet sex offenders. Deviant Behaviour 34(2): 135-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2012.707550

Wolfe S 2018. After 20 years, Yahoo Messenger is finally shutting down. Business Insider, 9 June. https://www.businessinsider.com.au/yahoo-messenger-is-shutting-down-2018-6

Woodhams J, Kloess JA, Jose B & Hamilton-Giachritsis CE 2021. Characteristics and behaviors of anonymous users of dark web platforms suspected of child sexual offenses. Frontiers in Psychology 12: 623–668. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.623668