Giving voice to the silenced victims: A qualitative study of intimate partner femicide

Paper chain of people image

Scholars highlight the importance of asking victim–survivors of intimate partner violence directly about their lived experiences. In cases where the victim is killed, however, those voices are silenced. Qualitative interviews with friends and family members (informants) of intimate partner femicide victims highlighted that, while many victims experienced physical violence at the hands of their partners, they often did not label such violence as ‘abuse’. The interviews further revealed that all victims experienced coercive control, and most were in the process of regaining some level of autonomy at the time of their deaths. As might be expected, the grief and loss for the survivors was close to unbearable.


URLs correct as at November 2021

Armour MP 2002. Journey of family members of homicide victims: A qualitative study of their posthomicide experience. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 72(3): 372–382.

Bailey JE et al. 1997. Risk factors for violent death of women in the home. Archives of Internal Medicine 157(7): 777–782.

Bishop C 2016. Domestic violence: The limitations of a legal response. In S Hilder & V Bettinson (eds), Domestic violence. London: Palgrave Macmillan: 59–79.

Block CR 2000. The Chicago Women’s Health Risk Study: Risk of serious injury or death in intimate violence: A collaborative research project. Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority

Braun V & Clarke V 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101.

Bricknell S & Doherty L 2021. Homicide in Australia 201819. Statistical Report no. 34. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.

Bruton C & Tyson D 2017. Leaving violent men: A study of women’s experiences of separation in Victoria, Australia. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 51(3): 339–354.

Caman S, Howner K, Kristiansson M & Sturup J 2017. Differentiating intimate partner homicide from other homicide: A Swedish population-based study of perpetrator, victim, and incident characteristics. Psychology of Violence 7(2): 306–315.

Campbell JC et al. 2003. Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: Results from a multisite case control study. American Journal of Public Health 93(7): 1089–1097.

Campbell JC, Glass N, Sharps PW, Laughon K & Bloom T 2007. Intimate partner homicide: Review and implications of research and policy. Trauma Violence & Abuse 8(3): 246–269.

Child and Youth Protection Services 2020. Working with families affected by domestic and family violence. Canberra: ACT Government.

Crossman KA, Hardesty JL & Raffaelli M 2016. “He could scare me without laying a hand on me”: Mothers’ experiences of nonviolent coercive control during marriage and after separation. Violence Against Women 22(4): 454–473.

Dobash RE & Dobash R 2015. When men murder women. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Douglas H 2018. Legal systems abuse and coercive control. Criminology & Criminal Justice 18(1): 84–99.

Douglas H & Godden L 2003. Intimate partner violence: Transforming harm into a crime. eLaw: Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law 10(2): 1–17

Hardesty JL, Campbell JC, McFarlane JM & Lewandowski LA 2008. How children and their caregivers adjust after intimate partner femicide. Journal of Family Issues 29(1): 100–124.

Home Office 2016. Multi-agency statutory guidance for the conduct of domestic homicide reviews. London: Home Office.

Humphreys C & Thiara R 2003a. Mental health and domestic violence: ‘I call it symptoms of abuse’. British Journal of Social Work, 33(2), 209–226.

Humphreys C & Thiara RK 2003b. Neither justice nor protection: Women’s experiences of post‐separation violence. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 25(3): 195–214.

Johnson H, Eriksson L, Mazerolle P & Wortley R 2019. Intimate femicide: The role of coercive control. Feminist Criminology 14(1): 3–23.

Johnson H & Hotton T 2003. Losing control: Homicide risk in estranged and intact intimate relationships. Homicide Studies 7(1): 58–84.

Kirkwood C 1993. Leaving abusive partners: From the scars of survival to the wisdom for change. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications

Lempert LB 1996. Women’s strategies for survival: Developing agency in abusive relationships. Journal of Family Violence 11(3): 269–289.

Lewandowski L, McFarlane J, Campbell J, Gary F & Barenski C 2004. “He killed my mommy!” Murder or attempted murder of a child’s mother. Journal of Family Violence 19(4): 211–220.

Loseke D 2003. Thinking about social problems, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter

Lundgren E, Heimer G, Westerstrand J & Kalliokoski A-M 2002. Captured queen: Men’s violence against women in “equal” Sweden: A prevalence study. Umeå: Brottsoffermyndigheten

Matias A, Gonçalves M, Soeiro C & Matos M 2020. Intimate partner homicide: A meta-analysis of risk factors. Aggression and Violent Behavior 50.

McKenzie M, Hegarty KL, Palmer VJ & Tarzia L 2020. “Walking on eggshells:” A qualitative study of how friends of young women experiencing intimate partner violence perceive their role. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication.

Meyer S 2012. Why women stay: A theoretical examination of rational choice and moral reasoning in the context of intimate partner violence. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 45(2): 179–193.

Meyer S 2010. Responding to intimate partner violence victimisation: Effective options for help-seeking. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 389. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.

Monckton Smith J 2020. Intimate partner femicide: Using Foucauldian analysis to track an eight stage progression to homicide. Violence Against Women 26(11): 1267–1285.

Mouzos J 1999. Femicide: an overview of major findings. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 124. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.

Myhill A & Kelly L 2021. Counting with understanding? What is at stake in debates on researching domestic violence. Criminology & Criminal Justice 21(3): 280–296.

Sev’er A 1997. Recent or imminent separation and intimate violence against women: A conceptual overview and some Canadian examples. Violence Against Women 3(6): 566–589.

Sharp-Jeffs N, Kelly L & Klein R 2017. Long journeys toward freedom: The relationship between coercive control and space for action—measurement and emerging evidence. Violence Against Women 24(2): 163–185.

Stark E 2009. Rethinking coercive control. Violence Against Women 15(12): 1509–1525.

Stark E 2007. Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Stöckl H et al. 2013. The global prevalence of intimate partner homicide: A systematic review. The Lancet 382(9895): 859–865.

Tarzia L, Humphreys C & Hegarty K 2017. Translating research about domestic and family violence into practice in Australia: Possibilities and prospects. Evidence & Policy 13(4): 709–722.

Tolmie JR 2018. Coercive control: To criminalize or not to criminalize? Criminology & Criminal Justice 18(1): 50–66.

Tyson D 2020. Coercive control and intimate partner homicide. In M McMahon & P McGorrery (eds), Criminalising coercive control: Family violence and the criminal law. Springer: 73–90.

Walklate S & Fitz-Gibbon K 2019. The criminalisation of coercive control: The power of law? International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 8(4): 94–108.

Walklate S, Fitz-Gibbon K, McCulloch J & Maher J 2020. Towards a global femicide index: Counting the costs. Routledge

Websdale N 1999. Understanding domestic homicide. Boston: Northeastern University Press

Westmarland N & Kelly L 2013. Why extending measurements of ‘success’ in domestic violence perpetrator programmes matters for social work. British Journal of Social Work 43(6): 1092–1110.

Williamson E 2010. Living in the world of the domestic violence perpetrator: Negotiating the unreality of coercive control. Violence Against Women 16(12): 1412–1423.

Wilson M & Daly M 1993. Spousal homicide risk and estrangement. Violence and Victims 8(1): 3–16