Can family and friends improve probation and parole outcomes? A quantitative evaluation of Triple-S: Social Supports in Supervision

block people image

This study details the results of a quantitative evaluation of a new model of probation and parole called Triple-S: Social Supports in Supervision. The pilot project positioned community corrections staff as ‘super controllers’ who incorporate the parents, partners or peers of probationers and parolees into each client’s order to serve in the roles of offender handlers, target guardians and place managers. The findings demonstrated Triple-S had inconsistent effects on reoffending, as reductions were not always significant or sustained; however, some promising results showed a reduction of recidivism frequency and severity. Program fidelity (the slippage between expected versus observed Triple-S sessions) was influential, with greater model adherence resulting in lower rates of reoffending.


URLs correct as at February 2022

Bares KJ & Mowen TJ 2020. Examining the parole officer as a mechanism of social support during re-entry from prison. Crime & Delinquency 66: 1023–1051.

Burrell WD 2012. Community corrections management: Issues and strategies. Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute

Cohen LE & Felson M 1979. Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review 44: 588–608.

Cullen FT 1994. Social support as an organizing concept for criminology: Presidential address to the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences. Justice Quarterly 11: 527–559.

Cullen FT, Eck JE & Lowenkamp CT 2002. Environmental corrections: A new paradigm for effective probation and parole supervision. Federal Probation 66(2): 28–37

Cullen FT & Jonson CL 2012. Correctional theory: Context and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Cullen FT, Jonson CL & Mears DP 2017. Reinventing community corrections. In M Tonry & DS Nagin (eds), Reinventing American criminal justice – Crime and justice: A review of research (vol 46). Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 27–93

Denney AS, Tewskbury R & Jones RS 2014. Beyond basic needs: Social support and structure for successful offender reentry. Journal of Qualitative Criminal Justice & Criminology 2: 39-67.

Eck JE 2003. Police problems: The complexity of problem theory, research and evaluation. Crime Prevention Studies 15: 67–102

Executive Session on Community Corrections 2017. Toward an approach to community corrections for the 21st century: Consensus document of the Executive Session on Community Corrections. Program in Criminal Justice Policy and Management, Harvard Kennedy School

Gleicher L, Manchak SM & Cullen FT 2013. Creating a supervision toolkit: How to improve probation and parole. Federal Probation 77(1): 22–27

Hollis-Peel ME, Reynald DM, van Bavel M, Elffers H & Welsh BC 2011. Guardianship for crime prevention: A critical review of the literature. Crime, Law and Social Change 56: 53–70.

MacKenzie DL 2006. What works in corrections: Reducing the criminal activities of offenders and delinquents. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Madensen TD & Eck JE 2013. Crime places and place management. In FT Cullen & P Wilcox (eds), The Oxford handbook of criminological theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press: 554–578.

Martinez DJ & Abrams LS 2013. Informal social support among returning young offenders: A metasynthesis of the literature. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 57: 169–190.

Mazerolle L & Ransley J 2005. Third party policing. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Miller JM & Miller HV 2015. Rethinking program fidelity for criminal justice. Criminology & Public Policy 14(2): 339-349.

Pew Center on the States 2008. Putting public safety first: 13 strategies for successful supervision and reentry. Washington, DC: The Pew Charitable Trusts.

Sampson R, Eck JE & Dunham J 2010. Super controllers and crime prevention: A routine activity explanation of crime prevention success and failure. Security Journal 23: 37–51.

Schaefer L 2021. Routine activity theory. In H Pontell (ed), Oxford research encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice. New York: Oxford University Press.

Schaefer L & Brewer S 2021. Probation and parole: From control to case management. In E Jeglic & C Calkins (eds), Handbook of issues in criminal justice reform. New York: Springer.

Schaefer L, Cullen FT & Eck JE 2016. Environmental corrections: A new paradigm for supervising offenders in the community. Los Angeles: Sage.

Schaefer L, Cullen FT & Manchak SM 2017. The role of place in probation and parole. In D Weisburd & JE Eck (eds), Unraveling the crime-place connection: New directions in theory and policy. Advances in Criminological Theory series, vol 22. New York: Routledge: 191–215

Schaefer L & Little S 2020. A quasi-experimental evaluation of the “environmental corrections” model of probation and parole. Journal of Experimental Criminology 16: 535–553.

Schaefer L, Moir E & Williams G 2019. When a loved one is on community supervision: The crime controller strategies used by ‘PoPPs’ (parents/partners/peers of probationers and parolees). Criminal Justice Studies 32(2): 81–98.

Schaefer L, Townsley M & Hutchins B 2022. Can family and friends improve probation and parole outcomes? A quantitative evaluation of Triple-S: Social Supports in Supervision. Report to the Criminology Research Advisory Council. CRG 38/18–19.

Schaefer L, Williams GC & Ford T 2021. Social supports for community-supervised offenders: Risk factors or protective factors? Journal of Qualitative Criminal Justice and Criminology 11(1).

Smith MJ, Clarke R & Pease K 2002. Anticipatory benefits in crime prevention. In N Tilley (ed), Analysis for crime prevention: Crime prevention studies vol 13. Devon, UK: Criminal Justice Press and Willan Publishing: 71-88

Sullivan CJ, Welsh BC & Ilchi OS 2017. Modeling the scaling up of early crime prevention: Implementation challenges and opportunities for translational criminology. Criminology & Public Policy 16(2): 457-485

Taxman FS 2011. Parole: Moving the field forward through a new model of behavioral management. In L Gideon & H-E Sung (eds), Rethinking corrections: Rehabilitation, reentry, and reintegration. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage: 307–328.

Taxman FS, Young D & Byrne J 2004. With eyes wide open: Formalizing community and social control intervention in offender reintegration programmes. In S Maruna & R Immarigeon (eds), After crime and punishment: Pathways to offender reintegration. Portland, OR: Willan: 233–260

United Nations 2018. Introductory handbook on the prevention of recidivism and the social reintegration of offenders. Vienna: United Nations

Williams GC & Schaefer L 2021. Expanding desistance theory through the integration of offender strategies. Journal of Crime and Justice 44(1): 16–32.