Pre-sentence reports for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: An analysis of language and sentiment

Photo of gavel and scales

Pre-sentence reports (PSRs) provide information to courts on an individual’s background, circumstances, risks, needs and plans. Research has found that PSRs focus heavily on risk of recidivism, while identification of prosocial cultural and community factors is limited. This study sought to describe the language and sentiment in these reports. We studied PSRs written for Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people sentenced by the mainstream County Court of Victoria and the Koori Court Division of the County Court of Victoria. Findings indicate that risk-related words are more prevalent than words associated with strengths and culture in PSRs submitted to both courts. While the frequency of positive and negative sentiment was low in PSRs for both courts, those for the Koori Court were more positive in sentiment.


URLs correct as at June 2022

Andrews DA & Bonta J 2010. The psychology of criminal conduct, 5th ed. Routledge

Andrews DA, Bonta J & Wormith JS 2008. The Level of Service/Risk, Need, Responsivity (LS/RNR): User’s Manual. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems

Andrews DA, Bonta J & Wormith JS 2006. The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime and Delinquency 52(1): 7–27.

Anthony T, Marchetti E, Behrendt L & Longman C 2017. Individualised Justice through Indigenous community reports in sentencing. Journal of Judicial Administration 26(3): 121–140

Australian Bureau of Statistics 2021. Prisoner numbers and prisoner rates by Indigenous status and sex, states and territories, 2006-2021 (Tables 40 to 42).

Australian Bureau of Statistics 2016. Estimated resident Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Indigenous population, states and territories - 30 June 2016.

Australian Law Reform Commission 2017. Pathways to justice: An inquiry into the incarceration rate of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. ALRC report no. 133.

Barabas C, Dinakar K, Ito J, Virza M & Zittrain J 2018. Interventions over predictions: Reframing the ethical debate for actuarial risk assessment. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 81(1): 1–15.

Coulter DJ, Forkan ARM, Kang Y-B, Trounson JS & Shepherd SM 2022. Consideration of culture, strengths, and risk in pre-sentence reports. Report to the Criminology Research Advisory Council. CRG 04/19–20.

Cunneen C & Tauri JM 2019. Indigenous peoples, criminology, and criminal justice. Annual Review of Criminology 2(1): 359–381.

Department of Justice and Community Safety (Victoria) 2020. Annual report: 2019–20. Melbourne: Victorian Department of Justice and Community Safety.

Edwige V & Gray P 2021. Significance of culture to wellbeing, healing and rehabilitation. Bugmy Bar Book.

Hannah-Moffat K 2013. Actuarial sentencing: An “unsettled” proposition. Justice Quarterly 30(2): 270–296.

Hannah-Moffat K & Maurutto P 2010. Re-contextualizing pre-sentence reports: Risk and race. Punishment & Society 12(3): 262–286.

Harcourt BE 2006. Against prediction: Profiling, policing, and punishing in an actuarial age. University of Chicago Press.

MacLennan S & Shields P 2013. Evaluation of Gladue report pilot project. Legal Services Society.

Marchetti E 2017. Nothing works? A meta-review of Indigenous sentencing court evaluations. Current Issues in Criminal Justice 28(3): 257–276.

Murdocca C 2021. Understanding Gladue from the perspective of Indigenous people. Criminal Law Quarterly 69: 377–401

Shepherd SM & Anthony T 2018. Popping the cultural bubble of violence risk assessment tools. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology 29(2): 211–220.

Shepherd SM & Lewis-Fernandez R 2016. Forensic risk assessment and cultural diversity: Contemporary challenges and future directions. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law 22(4): 427–438.

Starr SB 2015. The risk assessment era: An overdue debate. Federal Sentencing Reporter 27(4): 205–206.

Victorian Aboriginal Legal Service 2021. Aboriginal Community Justice Reports.