Alternative reporting options for sexual assault: Perspectives of victim-survivors

Person holding a mobile phone
Abstract

Anonymous reporting tools for sexual assault contribute to gathering intelligence, reducing crime, increasing reporting and supporting survivors. This article examines victim-survivors’ knowledge of and experiences using alternative reporting options, drawing on data collected from a broader study of alternative reporting options for sexual assault. Focus groups with victim-survivors and interviews with support service staff reveal that survivors and support staff are unclear about how authorities use data from alternative reporting tools but can identify preferred designs for a form. Victim-survivors in particular strongly support having an alternative reporting option available.

References

URLs correct as at July 2023

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) 2022. Sexual assaults increase for tenth year in a row. Media release, 28 July. https://www.abs.gov.au/media-centre/media-releases/sexual-assaults-increase-tenth-year-row

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) 2017. Personal Safety, Australia. Canberra: ABS. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/crime-and-justice/personal-safety-australia/2016

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2020. Sexual assault in Australia. Canberra: AIHW. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/domestic-violence/sexual-assault-in-australia/

Braun V & Clarke V 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bryman A 2012. Social research methods. Fifth edition. Oxford University Press

Carson J & Carson B 2018. The historical roots and future direction for military law and policies on rape and sexual assault. Military Psychology 30(2): 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/mil0000180

Fileborn B & Loney-Howes R 2020. Using social media to resist gender-violence: A global perspective. In E Erez & P Ibarra (eds), Oxford encyclopaedia of international criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.613

Fitzgerald J 2021. Why did sexual assault reports spike in March 2021? Bureau Brief no. 155. Sydney: New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research. https://www.bocsar.nsw.gov.au/Pages/bocsar_publication/Pub_Summary/BB/BB155-Summary-Why-did-sexual-assault-reports-spike-in-March-2021.aspx

Friedman J 2007. Reporting sexual assault of women in the military. Cardozo Journal of Law & Gender 14: 375–400

Frith H 2000. Focusing on sex: Using focus groups in sex research. Sexualities 3: 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/136346000003003001

Heenan M & Murray S 2006. Study of reported rapes in Victoria 2000–2003: Summary research report. Melbourne: Office of Women’s Policy, Department for Victorian Communities

Heffron L, Busch-Armendariz NB, Vohra S, Johnson RJ & Camp V 2014. Giving sexual assault survivors time to decide: An exploration of the use and effects of the nonreport option. American Journal of Nursing 114(3): 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000444489.49091.10

Hesse-Biber S 2007. Feminist research: Exploring the interconnections of epistemology, methodology and method. In S Hesse-Biber (ed), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984270

Heydon G, Henry N, Loney-Howes R & Hindes S 2023. Alternative reporting options for sexual assault: Investigating their use, purpose and potential. Report to the Criminology Research Advisory Council. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/crg77116

Heydon G & Powell P 2018. Written-response interview protocols: An innovative approach to confidential reporting and victim interviewing in sexual assault investigations. Policing and Society 28(6): 631–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2016.1187146

Hope L, Gabbert F, Heaton-Armstrong A & Wolchover D 2013. Self-administered witness interview. Criminal Law and Justice Weekly 177(4)

Jordan J 2008. Perfect victims, perfect policing? Improving rape complainants’ experiences of police investigations. Public Administration 86: 699–719. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00749.x

Kitzinger J 1994. The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology and Health & Illness 16(1): 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347023

Liu H 2018. When whispers enter the cloud: Evaluating technology to prevent and report sexual assault. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 31(2): 939–963

Loney-Howes R, Heydon G & O’Neill T 2022. Connecting survivors to therapeutic support and criminal justice through information reporting options: An analysis of sexual violence reports made to a digital reporting tool in Australia. Current Issues in Criminal Justice 34(1): 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2021.2004983

Mitra-Kahn T, Newbigin C & Hardefeldt S 2016. Invisible women, invisible violence: Understanding and improving data on the experiences of domestic and family violence and sexual assault for diverse groups of women: State of knowledge paper. Landscapes DD01/2016. Sydney: ANROWS

Mortimer S, Powell A & Sandy L 2019. “Typical scripts” and their silences: Exploring myths about sexual violence and LGBTQ people from the perspectives of support workers. Current Issues in Criminal Justice 31(3): 333–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2019.1639287

Murphy-Oikonen J, McQueen K, Miller A, Chambers L & Hibert A 2020. Unfounded sexual assault: Women’s experience of not being believed by police. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 37(11–12): NP8916–NP8940. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520978190

Obada-Obieh B, Spagnolo L & Beznosov K 2020. Towards understanding privacy and trust in online reporting of sexual assault. In Sixteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2020): 145–164

O’Connor C & Joffe H 2020. Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 19: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220

Rich K & Seffrin P 2012. Police interviews of sexual assault reporters: Do attitudes matter? Violence and Victims 27(2): 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.27.2.263

Richards TN 2019. An updated review of institutions of higher education’s responses to sexual assault: Results from a nationally representative sample. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 34(10): 1983–2012. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516658757

Rosenstein JE, De Angelis K, McCone DR & Carroll MH 2018. Sexual assault & sexual harassment at the US military service academies. Military Psychology 30(3): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2017.1422950

Smith J, Scammon D & Beck S 1995. Using patient focus groups for new patient services. Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement 21(1): 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1070-3241(16)30124-9

Spencer D, Dodge A, Ricciardelli R & Ballucci D 2018. “I think it’s re-victimizing victims almost every time”: Police perceptions of criminal justice responses to sexual violence. Critical Criminology 26(2): 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-018-9390-2

Taylor S & Gassner L 2010. Stemming the flow: Challenges for policing adult sexual assault with regard to attrition rates and under‐reporting of sexual offences. Police Practice and Research 11(3): 240–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614260902830153

Tidmarsh P & Hamilton G 2020. Misconceptions of sexual crimes against adult victims: Barriers to justice. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 611. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti04824

Victorian Centres Against Sexual Assault 2018. CASA Forum annual report 2017–18. Victoria: VCASA. https://casa.org.au/about-us/annual-reports/