This paper presents results from a study that investigated the perspectives of victim-survivors about post-custodial measures for people with convictions for sexual offending (PCSOs). It addressed the question: what are victim-survivors’ reasons for supporting or opposing a wide range of PCSO post-custodial measures?
The study involved qualitative interviews with 26 victim-survivors of sexual violence. It found that victim-survivors were supportive of PCSOs being subject to a range of measures, including electronic monitoring, (non-public) sex offender registers, psychological interventions, parole supervision and Circles of Support and Accountability. In contrast, victim-survivors had very mixed views about public sex offender registers. The study emphasises the importance of considering victim-survivor perspectives in shaping post-custodial interventions for PCSOs.
References
URLs correct as at December 2024
Australian Bureau of Statistics 2021. Prisoners in Australia 2020–21. ABS cat. no. 4517.0. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2020. Sexual assault in Australia. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/family-domestic-and-sexual-violence/sexual-assault-in-australia
Bartels L & Martinovic M 2017. Electronic monitoring: The experience in Australia. European Journal of Probation 9(1): 80–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/2066220317697658
Bartels L, Walvisch J & Richards K 2019. More, longer, tougher… Or is it finally time for a different approach to the post-sentence management of sex offenders in Australia? Criminal Law Journal 43(1): 41–57
Bayens G & Roberson C 2011. Criminal justice research methods: Theory and practice, 2nd ed. Taylor & Francis. https://www.routledge.com/Criminal-Justice-Research-Methods-Theory-and-…
Braun V & Clarke V 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Caulfield L & Hill J 2014. Criminological research for beginners: A student’s guide. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203494738
Clark H 2010. ‘What is the justice system willing to offer?’ Understanding sexual assault victim/survivors’ criminal justice needs. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies. https://aifs.gov.au/research/family-matters/no-85/what-justice-system-willing-offer
Craun S, Kernsmith P & Butler N 2011. ‘Anything that can be a danger to the public’: Desire to extend registries beyond sex offenses. Criminal Justice Policy Review 22(3): 375–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403410378734
Craun S & Simmons C 2012. Taking a seat at the table: Sexual assault survivors’ views of sex offender registries. Victims & Offenders 7(3): 312–326
Daly K & Bouhours B 2010. Rape and attrition in the legal process: A comparative analysis of five countries. Crime & Justice 39(1): 565–650. https://doi.org/10.1086/653101
Dodd S 2018. The punitive woman? Gender differences in public attitudes toward parole among an Australian sample. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 62(10): 3006–3022
Duwe G 2015. What has worked and what has not with Minnesota sex offenders: A review of the evidence. Journal of Sexual Aggression 21(1): 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2014.901430
Falco D & Turner N 2014. Examining causal attributions towards crime on support for offender rehabilitation. American Journal of Criminal Justice 39: 630–641
Gannon T, Olver M, Mallion J & James M 2019. Does specialized psychological treatment for offending reduce recidivism? A meta-analysis examining staff and program variables as predictors of treatment effectiveness. Clinical Psychology Review 73: 101752
Gault B & Sabini J 2000. The roles of empathy, anger, and gender in predicting attitudes toward punitive, reparative, and preventative public policies. Cognition and Emotion 14(4): 495–520
Harper C, Hogue T & Bartels R 2017. Attitudes towards sexual offenders: What do we know, and why are they important? Aggression and Violent Behavior 34: 201–213
Haynes S & Cares A 2015. Victims’ and offenders’ views about crime and justice. Sociological Focus 48(3): 228–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2015.1039420
Herman S & Wasserman C 2001. A role for victims in offender reentry. Crime & Delinquency 47(3): 428–445
Herron B 2023. 40 Years of qualitative feminist interviewing: Conceptual moments and cultivating ecosystems of care. Qualitative Inquiry 29(6): 659–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004221139611
Hsieh H & Shannon S 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15(9): 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Hwang YI, Simpson P & Butler T 2021. Participant experiences of a post-release electronic monitoring program for domestic violence in New South Wales, Australia. Journal of Criminology 54(4): 482–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/26338076211028729
Koon-Magnin S 2015. Perceptions of and support for sex offender policies: Testing Levenson, Brannon, Fortney, and Baker’s findings. Journal of Criminal Justice 43(1): 80–88
Levenson J, Brannon Y, Fortney T & Baker J 2007. Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 7(1): 137–161
Levenson J, Fortney T & Baker J 2010. Views of sexual abuse professionals about sex offender notification policies. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 54(2): 150–168
Mason J 2018. Qualitative researching, 3rd ed. Sage. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-researching/book244365
McGlynn C, Downes J & Westmarland N 2017. Seeking justice for survivors of sexual violence: Recognition, voice and consequences. In E Zinsstag & M Keenan (eds), Restorative responses to sexual violence: Legal, social and therapeutic. Routledge: 179–191
McGlynn C & Westmarland N 2019. Kaleidoscopic justice: Sexual violence and victim-survivors’ perceptions of justice. Social & Legal Studies 28(2): 179–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663918761200
McLachlan K 2021. ‘Whether the victim wishes the offender to be released or not is unimportant’: Australia and New Zealand parole board members’ views of the role of victims of crime. Criminal Law Journal 45: 122–133
Miller KL 2014. Relational caring: The use of the victim impact statement by sexually assaulted women. Violence and Victims 29(5): 797–813
O’Sullivan K, Holderness D, Hong X, Bright D & Kemp R 2017. Public attitudes in Australia to the reintegration of ex-offenders: Testing a belief in redeemability (BiR) scale. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 23: 409–424
Ouellette H, Applegate B & Vuk M 2017. The public’s stance on prisoner reentry: Policy support and personal acceptance. American Journal of Criminal Justice 42: 768–789
Remeikis A 2019. Peter Dutton calls for national child-sex offender register. The Guardian, 9 January. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/jan/09/peter-dutton-cal…
Richards K et al. 2025. Victim-survivors’ perspectives on the reintegration of people with convictions for sexual offending. Report to the Criminology Research Advisory Council. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/crg77864
Richards K, Death J & McCartan K 2020. Community-based approaches to sexual offender reintegration. Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety. https://www.anrows.org.au/project/community-based-approaches-to-sexual-offender-reintegration/
Richards K, Death J, McCartan K & Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety 2020. Research to policy and practice issue 07: Community-based approaches to sexual offender reintegration: Key findings and future directions. Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety. https://www.anrows.org.au/project/community-based-approaches-to-sexual-offender-reintegration/
Richards K, Death J & Ronken C 2023. The views of victim/survivors of sexual violence about perpetrator post-release measures. Criminal Justice Studies 36(4): 418–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2023.2218531
Richards K, Death J & Ronken C 2021. What do victim/survivors of sexual violence think about Circles of Support and Accountability? Victims & Offenders 16(6): 893–911. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2020.1850578
Socia K et al. 2020. How background relates to perceptions of child sexual abuse prevention and policies related to individuals convicted of sex crimes. Criminal Justice Policy Review 31(7): 1059–1094
Spoo S et al. 2018. Victims’ attitudes toward sex offenders and sex offender legislation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 62(11): 3385–3407
Wan W-Y, Poynton S, van Doorn G & Weatherburn D 2014. Parole supervision and reoffending. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 485. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti174972
Weare S & Hulley J 2023. Interviewing male survivors of sexual violence and abuse: Ethical and methodological considerations. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 38(1–2): 2234–2254
Youssef C 2022. Self-determination theory as an underpinning theory for community maintenance programs for those who have sexually offended. Journal of Sexual Aggression 29(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2022.2044525