Research examining restorative justice (RJ) for domestic and family violence (DFV) and sexual violence is growing. While best practice principles are used to guide the design and implementation of RJ for these forms of violence, these principles have primarily been informed by experts and other stakeholders. Importantly, there has been little empirical examination of the perspectives of victim-survivors on best practice in relation to RJ for DFV and sexual violence.
The current study addresses this gap, drawing on interviews with and surveys of 13 victim-survivors who participated in an Australian RJ program for DFV and sexual violence. Victim-survivors repeatedly identified Convenors’ skills and expertise, flexibility and a feeling that they were supported to satisfy a diverse range of justice needs as critical to the success of restorative justice in this context.
References
URLs correct as at March 2025
Bolitho J 2015. Putting justice needs first: A case study of best practice in restorative justice. Restorative Justice 3(2): 256–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/20504721.2015.1069531
Burns CJ & Sinko L 2021. Restorative justice for survivors of sexual violence experienced in adulthood: A scoping review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 24(2): 340-354. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380211029408
Daly K 2006. Restorative justice and sexual assault: An archival study of court and conference cases. British Journal of Criminology 46(2): 334–356. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azi071
Daly K & Wade D 2017. Sibling sexual violence and victims’ justice interests: A comparison of youth conferencing and judicial sentencing. In E Zinsstag & M Keenan (eds), Restorative responses to sexual violence. Routledge: 143–178
Gavrielides T 2015. Is restorative justice appropriate for domestic violence cases? Social Work Review 14(4): 105–121. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385337812_Is_Restorative_Justice_Appropriate_for_Domestic_Violence_Cases
Herman JL 2005. Justice from the victim’s perspective. Violence Against Women 11(5): 571–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801205274450
Jeffries S, Wood WR & Russell T 2021. Adult restorative justice and gendered violence: Practitioner and service provider viewpoints from Queensland, Australia. Laws 10(1): 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws10010013
Joudo Larsen J 2014. Restorative justice in the Australian criminal justice system. Research and public policy series no. 127. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/rpp/rpp127
Jülich S 2006. Views of justice among survivors of historical child sexual abuse: Implications for restorative justice in New Zealand. Theoretical Criminology 10(1): 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480606059988
Lawler S, Boxall H & Dowling C 2025. Restorative justice conferencing for domestic and family violence and sexual violence: Evaluation of Phase Three of the ACT Restorative Justice Scheme. Research Report no. 33. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/rr77680
Lopez EC & Koss MP 2017. The RESTORE Program for sex crimes: Differentiating therapeutic jurisprudence from restorative justice with therapeutic components. In E Zinsstag & M Keenan (eds), Restorative responses to sexual violence. Routledge: 212–228
Marsh F & Wager NM 2015. Restorative justice in cases of sexual violence: Exploring the views of the public and survivors. Probation Journal 62(4): 336–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550515619571
Marshall T 1999. Restorative justice: An overview. London: Home Office
Nascimento AM, Andrade J & De Castro Rodrigues A 2023. The psychological impact of restorative justice practices on victims of crimes: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 24(3): 1929–1947. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221082085
Pennell J, Burford G, Sasson E, Packer H & Smith EL 2021. Family and community approaches to intimate partner violence: Restorative programs in the United States. Violence Against Women 27(10): 1608–1629. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220945030
Robinson G & Shapland J 2008. Reducing recidivism: A task for restorative justice? British Journal of Criminology 48(3): 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azn002
Ruggiano N & Perry TE 2019. Conducting secondary analysis of qualitative data: Should we, can we, and how? Qualitative Social Work 18(1): 81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325017700701
Sardina A & Ackerman AR 2022. Restorative justice in cases of sexual harm. CUNY Law Review 25: 1. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/clr/vol25/iss1/10/
Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee 2023. Current and proposed sexual consent laws in Australia. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and_Constitutional_Affairs/
sexualcontentlaws/Report
Silva S 2020. Impact of victim offender dialogue on victims of serious crimes: A longitudinal cohort-control study. Center for Victim Research Repository. https://www.ojp.gov/library/publications/impact-victim-offender-dialogue-victims-serious-crimes-longitudinal-cohort
Stubbs J 2007. Beyond apology? Domestic violence and critical questions for restorative justice. Criminology & Criminal Justice 7(2): 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895807075570
Thomas DR 2006. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation 27(2): 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
Van Camp T & Wemmers J-A 2013. Victim satisfaction with restorative justice: More than simply procedural justice. International Review of Victimology 19(2): 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269758012472764
Wolthuis A & Lünnemann K 2016. Restorative justice and domestic violence: A guide for practitioners. Saatavilla: Verwey-Jonker Institute. https://www.unodc.org/e4j/data/_university_uni_/restorative_justice_and_domestic_violence_a_guide_for_
practitioners.html