Building procedural justice in Australian street-level drug law enforcement

Person sitting next to drugs
Abstract

This study used a purpose-built module in the 2019 Global Drug Survey to provide the first comprehensive assessment of the extent to which Australian street-level drug law enforcement approaches are perceived as procedurally just by people who use illicit drugs, to benchmark procedural justice levels against 29 other nations and to identify predictors of and methods to enhance procedural justice.

People who use drugs in Australia concurred that police commonly follow some aspects of procedural justice, such as respecting people’s rights, but were critical of other procedural justice areas, such as the extent to which police choose how they enforce the law. Cross-national analyses showed Australia ranked 15th out of 30 countries in a composite procedural justice index: higher than the United States, but significantly lower than New Zealand and Canada. Avenues to improve the procedural justice of Australian street level drug law enforcement are outlined.

References

URLs correct as at September 2025

ACT Policing 2022. Better practice guide on fixed-site drug checking service at 1 Moore Street Canberra (ACT). Canberra: ACT Policing. https://www.afp.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-08/Fixed%20drug%20checking%20service%20BPG.pdf

Agramunt S & Lenton S 2023. Evaluation of the Western Australian Police Force Naloxone Pilot: A summary of the main findings. Perth: National Drug Research Institute. https://ndri.curtin.edu.au/ndri/media/documents/publications/UP47.pdf

Akintoye B, Ali A & Stevens A 2022. The ongoing impact on the racialised policing of Black communities. In I Crome, N David & A Stevens (eds), Drug science and British drug policy: Critical analysis of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. United Kingdom: Waterside Press: 193–208

Allen SOL 2020. Policing young people at mass events: Does procedural justice foster help seeking? (doctoral thesis). Griffith University, Queensland, Australia

Australian Bureau of Statistics 2024. Recorded Crime - Offenders. Canberra: ABS. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/crime-and-justice/recorded-crime-offenders

Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission 2023. Illicit drug data report 2020–21. Canberra: Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission. https://www.acic.gov.au/publications/illicit-drug-data-report/illicit-drug-data-report-2020-21

Babor TF, Caulkins JP, Edwards G, Fischer B, Foxcroft DR, Humphreys K, Obot IS, Rehm J & Reuter P 2010. Drug policy and the public good. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Bacon M & Spicer J 2022. Drug law enforcement, policing and harm reduction: Ending the stalemate. Abingdon: Routledge

Baranauskas AJ 2022. Racial resentment, crime concerns, and public attitudes toward defunding the police. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice 20(1): 48–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377938.2022.2053626

Barratt MJ et al. 2017. Moving on from representativeness: Testing the utility of the Global Drug Survey. Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment 11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1178221817716391

Beyer L, Crofts N & Reid G 2002. Drug offending and criminal justice responses: Practitioners’ perspectives. International Journal of Drug Policy 13(3): 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-3959(02)00063-4

Bharat C et al. 2023. Agreement between self-reported illicit drug use and biological samples: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction 118(9): 1624–1648. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16200

Bruton L, Gibney S, Hynes T, Collins D & Moran P 2021. Spending review 2021. Focused policy assessment of reducing harm, supporting recovery: An analysis of expenditure and performance in the area of drug and alcohol misuse. Dublin: Government of Ireland

Caulkins JP & Reuter P 2017. Dealing more effectively and humanely with illegal drugs. Crime and Justice 46(1): 95–158. https://doi.org/10.1086/688458

Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care 2017. National Drug Strategy 2017–2026. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care. https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/national-drug-strategy-2017-2026

Csete J et al. 2016. Public health and international drug policy. The Lancet 387(10026): 1427–1480. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00619-X

den Heyer G 2021a. New Zealand Police’s Policing Excellence and Prevention First Strategy: A new approach to police service delivery. In JF Albrecht & G den Heyer (eds), Enhancing police service delivery. Cham: Springer: 207–236

den Heyer G 2021b. Police strategy development: The New Zealand Police prevention strategy. Police Practice and Research 22(1): 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2020.1786688

Eastwood N, Shiner M & Bear D 2013. The numbers in black and white: Ethnic disparities in the policing and prosecution of drug offences in England and Wales. London: Release UK

Falzon D et al. 2022. Challenges for drug checking services in Scotland: A qualitative exploration of police perceptions. Harm Reduction Journal 19(1): 105. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-022-00686-6

Fleetwood J & Lea J 2022. Defunding the police in the UK: Critical questions and practical suggestions. Howard Journal of Crime and Justice 61(2): 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12468

Goulka J, Del Pozo B & Beletsky L 2021. From public safety to public health: Re-envisioning the goals and methods of policing. Journal of Community Safety & Well-Being 6(1): 22. https://doi.org/10.35502/jcswb.184

Greer A, Selfridge M, Watson TM, Macdonald S & Pauly B 2022. Young people who use drugs views toward the power and authority of police officers. Contemporary Drug Problems 49(2): 170–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/00914509211058989

Greer A, Sorge J, Sharpe K, Bear D & Macdonald S 2018. Police encounters and experiences among youths and adults who use drugs: Qualitative and quantitative findings of a cross-sectional study in Victoria, British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 60(4): 478–504. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2017-0044.r1

Hughes C, Barratt MJ, Ferris JA, Maier LJ & Winstock AR 2018. Drug-related police encounters across the globe: How do they compare? International Journal of Drug Policy 56: 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.03.005

Hughes C, Lancaster K & Spicer B 2011. How do Australian news media depict illicit drug issues? An analysis of print media reporting across and between illicit drugs, 2003–2008. International Journal of Drug Policy 22(4): 285–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2011.05.008

Hughes C, Moxham-Hall V, Ritter A, Weatherburn D & MacCoun R 2017. The deterrent effects of Australian street-level drug law enforcement on illicit drug offending at outdoor music festivals. International Journal of Drug Policy 41: 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.12.018

Hughes C, Seear K, Ritter A & Mazerolle L 2019. Criminal justice responses relating to personal use and possession of illicit drugs: The reach of Australian drug diversion programs and barriers and facilitators to expansion. Drug Policy Modelling Program Monograph no. 27. Sydney: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Australia. https://doi.org/10.26190/5cca661ce09ce

Hughes C, Stevens A, Barratt MJ, Ferris JA, Maier LJ, Winstock AR 2026. Building procedural justice in street-level drug law enforcement: An Australian and cross-national analysis. Report to the Criminology Research Advisory Council. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/crg78144

Hughes C, Stevens A, Hulme S & Cassidy R 2018. Review of approaches taken in Ireland and in other jurisdictions to simple possession drug offences: A report for the Irish Department of Justice and Equality and the Department of Health. Sydney: UNSW Australia and University of Kent. https://doi.org/10.26190/unsworks/27090

Kelling GL & Moore MH 1988. The evolving strategy of policing. Perspectives on Policing no. 4. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/114213.pdf

Kerr T, Small W & Wood E 2005. The public health and social impacts of drug market enforcement: A review of the evidence. International Journal of Drug Policy 16(4): 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.04.005

Kochel TR 2017. The impact of the Ferguson, MO police shooting on Black and Nonblack residents’ perceptions of police: Procedural justice, trust, and legitimacy. In D Oberwittler & S Roché (eds), Police-citizen relations across the world. London: Routledge: 196–218

Leslie EM, Cherney A et al. 2017a. Willingness to cooperate with police: A population-based study of Australian young adult illicit stimulant users. Criminology & Criminal Justice 17(3): 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895816671382

Leslie E, Smirnov A, Cherney A, Kemp R & Najman JM 2017b. The role of procedural justice in how young adult stimulant users perceive police and policing. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 533. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti133680

Maher L & Dixon D 1999. Policing and public health: Law enforcement and harm minimization in a street-level drug market. British Journal of Criminology 39(4): 488–512. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/39.4.488

Matthew-Simmons F, Love S & Ritter A 2008. A review of Australian public opinion surveys on illicit drugs. Drug Policy Modelling Program Monograph no. 17. Sydney: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Australia

Mazerolle L, Antrobus E, Bennett S & Tyler TR 2013. Shaping citizen perceptions of police legitimacy: A randomized field trial of procedural justice. Criminology 51(1): 33–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00289.x

Mazerolle L, Bennett S, Davis J, Sargeant E & Manning M 2013. Procedural justice and police legitimacy: A systematic review of the research evidence. Journal of Experimental Criminology 9: 245–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-013-9175-2

Mazerolle L, Eggins E & Higginson A 2020. Street-level drug law enforcement: An updated systematic review. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 599. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti04640

Mazerolle L & Terrill W 2018. Making every police-citizen interaction count: The challenges of building a better cop. Criminology and Public Policy 17: 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12340

Meares TL, Tyler TR & Gardener J 2015. Lawful or fair? How cops and laypeople perceive good policing. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 105(2): 297–344. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26402450

Miller P et al. 2015. Drug use in Australian nightlife settings: Estimation of prevalence and validity of self‐report. Addiction 110(11): 1803–1810. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13060

Murphy K 2020. The empirical study of procedural justice policing in Australia: Highlights and challenges. In D Meyerson, C Mackenzie & T MacDermott (eds), Procedural justice and relational theory. Abingdon UK: Routledge: 21–43

Nagin DS & Telep CW 2020. Procedural justice and legal compliance. Criminology and Public Policy 19(3): 761–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12499

New Zealand Police 2017. New Zealand Police four year plan 2017/20182020/2021: The safest country: Policing 2021. Wellington: New Zealand Police. https://www.police.govt.nz/sites/default/files/publications/2017-21-police-four-year-plan.pdf

NSW Government 2023. Police given power to issue on-the-spot fines with health intervention for small quantity drug possession. Media release, 10 October. https://www.nsw.gov.au/media-releases/police-given-power-to-issue-on-spot-fines-health-intervention-for-small-quantity-drug-possession

Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights 2023. A/HRC/54/53: Human rights challenges in addressing and countering all aspects of the world drug problem: Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Geneva: OHCHR. https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/thematic-reports/ahrc5453-human-rights-challenges-addressing-and-countering-all-aspects

Petrocelli M, Oberweis T, Smith MR & Petrocelli J 2014. Assessing police attitudes toward drugs and drug enforcement. American Journal of Criminal Justice 39: 22–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-013-9200-z

Productivity Commission 2018. Report on government services. Canberra: Australian Government Productivity Commission. https://www.pc.gov.au/research/ongoing/report-on-government-services/2018/justice/police-services/rogs-2018-partc-chapter6.pdf

Queensland Government 2023. New approach to save lives. Media statement, 20 April. https://statements.qld.gov.au/statements/97611

Reiner R 1985. A watershed in policing. Political Quarterly 56(2): 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.1985.tb02344.x

Rhodes T 2009. Risk environments and drug harms: A social science for harm reduction approach. International Journal of Drug Policy 20(3): 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2008.10.003

Ritter A 2021. Drug policy. London: Routledge

Ritter A, Grealy M, Kelaita P & Kowalski M 2024. The Australian ‘drug budget’: Government drug policy expenditure 2021/22. Drug Policy Modelling Program Monograph no. 36. Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre, UNSW. https://doi.org/10.26190/unsworks/30075

Room R & Reuter P 2012. How well do international drug conventions protect public health? The Lancet 379(9810): 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61423-2

Ruddell R & Trott K 2022. Perceptions of trust in the police: A cross-national comparison. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 47(4): 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2022.2071308

Selfridge M, Mitchell L, Greer A, Macdonald S & Pauly B 2020. ‘Accidental intimacies’: Reconsidering bodily encounters between police and young people who use drugs. Contemporary Drug Problems 47(3): 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091450920929101

Stevens A, Hughes CE, Hulme S & Cassidy R 2022. Depenalization, diversion and decriminalization: A realist review and programme theory of alternatives to criminalization for simple drug possession. European Journal of Criminology 19(1): 29–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370819887514

Terpstra J 2013. Towards a national police in the Netherlands: Backgrounds of a radical police reform. In NR Fyf, JB Terpstra & P Tops (eds), Centralizing forces? Comparative perspectives on contemporary police reform in northern and western Europe. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing: 137–155

Terpstra J & Fyfe NR 2015. Mind the implementation gap? Police reform and local policing in the Netherlands and Scotland. Criminology and Criminal Justice 15(5): 527–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895815572162

Tyler TR 2006. Why people obey the law. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press

Tyler TR 2004. Enhancing police legitimacy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 593(1): 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716203262627

Tyler TR, Fagan J & Geller A 2014. Street stops and police legitimacy: Teachable moments in young urban men’s legal socialization. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 11(4): 751–785. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12055

Tyler TR & Huo YJ 2002. Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime 2023. World drug report 2023. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime 2020a. UNODC data portal: Access and functioning of the criminal justice system. https://dataunodc.un.org/dp-cjs-persons-convicted

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime 2020b. UNODC data portal: Data on drug use prevalence. https://dataunodc.un.org/dp-drug-use-prevalence

United Nations System Chief Executives Board for Coordination 2018. CEB/2018/2: United Nations system common position supporting the implementation of the international drug control policy through effective inter-agency collaboration. Vienna: United Nations. https://unsceb.org/sites/default/files/2021-01/2018%20Nov%20-%20UN%20system%20common%20position%20on%20drug%20policy.pdf

Walters GD & Bolger PC 2019. Procedural justice perceptions, legitimacy beliefs, and compliance with the law: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology 15: 341–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-018-9338-2

Weatherburn D & Lind B 1997. The impact of law enforcement activity on a heroin market. Addiction 92(5): 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1997.tb02913.x

White MD, Mulvey P & Dario LM 2016. Arrestees’ perceptions of the police: Exploring procedural justice, legitimacy, and willingness to cooperate with police across offender types. Criminal Justice and Behavior 43(3): 343–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815602501

Winstock AR, Davies EL, Ferris JA, Maier LJ & Barratt MJ 2022. Using the Global Drug Survey for harm reduction. In J Matias, A Soderholm, K Skarupova, A Noor & J Mounteney (eds), Monitoring drug use in the digital age: Studies in web survey. Lisbon: EMCDDA