Restorative justice for sexual violence survivors: Expanding restorative pathways

Published Date
ISBN
9781922878403
CRG Report Number
11-22-23
https://doi.org/10.52922/crf78403
Abstract

This research examines how restorative justice can and is being used to address the harms following sexual violence in the Australian Capital Territory. Our focus is exploring pathways beyond the criminal legal system, as many sexual violence survivors do not report to police, and the ACT’s formal restorative justice pathway remains accessible largely only through police reporting. Through stakeholder interviews, this study reveals significant demand for justice pathways that can provide acknowledgement, accountability and healing, without necessarily requiring legal system engagement. The research identifies existing informal restorative justice practices, including community-facilitated processes, youth circles and institutional responses, but finds that they are fragmented and precarious. Multiple barriers impede expanded implementation of restorative approaches: practical constraints, cultural concerns, emotional barriers and institutional risk aversion. The report proposes a pluralistic approach that balances formal structures with community-led initiatives, centres survivor voice and agency, and embeds trauma-informed practice. Strategic recommendations emphasise adequate resourcing, skills development and genuine partnership with civil society to create responsive, culturally safe pathways to justice.

Contents

  • Acknowledgements
  • Acronyms
  • Abstract
  • Executive summary
    • Background
    • Research focus
    • Key findings
    • Implementation principles
    • Strategic recommendations
    • Conclusion
  • Introduction
    • A discussion on terminology
  • Literature review
    • Four key drivers of change
    • Current landscape of restorative justice for sexual violence
    • Challenges and considerations
    • Australian Law Reform Commission inquiry
    • Conclusion
  • Research design and methodology
    • The current research
    • The Australian Capital Territory as a case study
    • Research questions and methodology
  • The legal system pathway to restorative justice
    • Current limitations of the legal system approach to sexual violence
    • Evolution of formal restorative justice pathways in the ACT
    • Strengths of the current pathway to restorative justice
    • Challenges impeding uptake and availability
    • Conclusion: Balancing formality and flexibility
  • Alternative pathways to RJ and appetite for an expansive vision
    • Existing alternative pathways
    • Reflection on identified practices
    • Appetite for an expansive vision
    • Addressing justice gaps with restorative justice
    • Summary: Multiple justice pathways
  • Barriers, gaps and risks in expanding alternative pathways to restorative justice
    • Barriers to accessing alternative pathways
    • Gaps in non-CLS service provision
    • Risks and resistance points in alternative pathways
    • Conclusion
  • Implementing an expansive restorative justice vision
    • Guiding principles for implementation
    • Envisioning a pluralistic approach to restorative justice
    • Broader context: Canberra as a restorative city
    • Implications for key stakeholders
  • Conclusion: The path forward
  • References

References

URLs correct as at January 2026

ACT Government 2025aThe ACT Intermediary Program. https://www.hrc.act.gov.au/intermediaries

ACT Government 2025bCanberra as a Restorative Cityhttps://www.justice.act.gov.au/canberra-as-a-restorative-city

ACT Government 2025cRestorative practicehttps://www.education.act.gov.au/support-for-our-students/positive-behaviour-mental-health-and-wellbeing-approaches-in-our-schools/restorative-practice

ACT Government 2024. Sexual assault (police) review. https://www.act.gov.au/open/sexual-assault-police-review

ACT Government 2022. Government response to the Listen. Take action to prevent, believe, and heal report. https://www.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/2380582/Government-Response-to-the-Listen.-Take-Action-to-Prevent-Believe-and-Heal-Report.pdf

ACT Government 2021a. Chair of Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Steering Committee announced and groups established. Media release, 29 June. https://www.cmtedd.act.gov.au/open_government/inform/act_government_media_releases/yvette-berry-mla-media-releases/2021/chair-of-sexual-assault-prevention-and-response-steering-committee-announced-and-groups-established

ACT Government 2021bListen. Take action to prevent, believe and heal: Presented to the ACT Government by the Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Steering Committee. https://www.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/2390204/Listen-Take-Action-to-Prevent-Believe-and-Heal.pdf

ACT Government 2021c. New sexual assault prevention and response working group. Media release, 29 March. https://www.cmtedd.act.gov.au/open_government/inform/act_government_media_releases/yvette-berry-mla-media-releases/2021/new-sexual-assault-prevention-and-response-working-group

ACT Magistrates Court 2025a. Galambany Courthttps://www.courts.act.gov.au/magistrates/about-the-courts/areas-in-the-act-magistrates-court/galambany-court

ACT Magistrates Court 2025b. Warrumbul Circle Sentencing Courthttps://www.courts.act.gov.au/magistrates/about-the-courts/areas-in-the-act-magistrates-court/warrumbul-circle-sentencing-court

Albanese A, Gallagher K & Rishworth A 2024. Working to end violence against women with rapid review into prevention approaches. Media release, 28 May. https://www.pm.gov.au/media/working-end-violence-against-women-rapid-review-prevention-approaches

ALRC—see Australian Law Reform Commission

Australian Bureau of Statistics 2023. Sexual violencehttps://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/crime-and-justice/sexual-violence/2021-22

Australian Government 2025. National Student Ombudsman now taking complaintshttps://www.education.gov.au/national-student-ombudsman/announcements/national-student-ombudsman-now-taking-complaints

Australian Government 2024. National Redress Scheme. https://web.archive.org/web/20240516030108/https://www.nationalredress.gov.au

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2025. Family, domestic, and sexual violence. https://www.aihw.gov.au/family-domestic-and-sexual-violence

Australian Law Reform Commission 2025a. ALRC final report tabled today for Inquiry into Justice Responses to Sexual Violence. Media release, 6 March. https://www.alrc.gov.au/news/alrc-final-report-tabled-today-for-inquiry-into-justice-responses-to-sexual-violence/

Australian Law Reform Commission 2025b. Safe, informed, supported: Reforming justice responses to sexual violence. https://www.alrc.gov.au/publication/jrsv-report-143/

Australian Law Reform Commission 2024. Justice systems response to sexual violence inquiry begins. Media release, 23 January. https://www.alrc.gov.au/news/justice-systems-response-to-sexual-violence-inquiry-begins/

Basile K, Smith S & Breiding M 2014. Sexual violence surveillance: Uniform definitions and recommended data elements. US National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Violence Prevention. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/26326

Bellis M et al. 2023. Global prevalence of adverse childhood experiences: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World Psychiatry 22: 463–478

Birkeland M, Skar A & Jensen T 2021. Do different traumatic events invoke different kinds of post-traumatic stress symptoms? European Journal of Psychotraumatology 12: 1866399

Bishop B, Naylor B & Loff L 2019. A community-based survivor-victim focussed restorative justice – A pilot. Report to the Criminology Research Advisory Council. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/crg/reports/crg-3314-15

Bloom S 2013. Creating sanctuary: Toward the evolution of sane societies. Routledge

Bolitho J 2015. Putting justice needs first: A case study of best practice in restorative justice. Restorative Justice 3: 256–281

Bolitho J & Freeman K 2016. The use and effectiveness of restorative justice in criminal justice systems following child sexual abuse or comparable harms. Report for the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. Sydney: University of NSW. https://doi.org/10.26190/unsworks/25779

Burns C & Sinko L 2021. Restorative justice for survivors of sexual violence experienced in adulthood: A scoping review. Trauma, Violence & Abuse 24: 340–354

Chisholm K & Koss M 2024. Survivor-victim perspectives on the possibility of restorative justice conferencing after sexual assault. International Journal of Restorative Justice 7: 410–435

Christen-Schneider C 2023. Trauma-informed restorative dialogues: The power of community. Routledge

City News 2022. Sexual harassment: ANU ‘fails’ students, says report. City News, 23 March. https://citynews.com.au/2022/anu-students-report-high-levels-of-sexual-harrassment-study-finds/

Coker D 2002. Transformative justice: Anti-subordination processes in cases of domestic violence. In H Strang & J Braithwaite (eds), Restorative justice and family violence. Cambridge University Press

Cox P 2015. Sexual assault and domestic violence in the context of co-occurrence and re-victimisation: State of knowledge paper (ANROWS Landscapes, 13/2015). Sydney: ANROWS

Cripps K & McGlade H 2008. Indigenous family violence and sexual abuse: Considering pathways forward. Journal of Family Studies 14: 240–253

Curtis-Fawley S & Daly K 2005. Gendered violence and restorative justice: The views of victim advocates. Violence Against Women 11: 603–638

Daly K 2024. Stepping out of the shadow of transitional justice: A theoretical framework for institutional justice. Victims & Offenders 19: 1239–1275

Daly K 2017. Sexual violence and victims justice interests. In E Zinsstag & M Keenan (eds), Restorative responses to sexual violence: Legal, social and therapeutic dimensions. Routledge: 108–140

Daly K 2016. What is restorative justice? Fresh answers to a vexed question. Victims & Offenders 11: 9–29

Daly K 2011. Conventional and innovative justice responses to sexual violence. ACSSA Issues 12: 1–35

Daly K 2006. Restorative justice and sexual assault: An archival study of court and conference cases. British Journal of Criminology 46: 334–356

Daly K & Stubbs J 2006. Feminist engagement with restorative justice. Theoretical Criminology 10: 9–28

Davis A, Dent G, Meiners E & Richie B 2022. Abolition. Feminism. Now. Haymarket Books

Davis F 2019. The little book of race and restorative justice: Black lives, healing, and US social transformation. Good Books

Dinos S, Burrowes N, Hammond K & Cunliffe C 2015. A systematic review of juries assessment of rape victims: Do rape myths impact on juror decision-making? International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 43: 36–49

Dole N 2024. NSW director of public prosecutions orders review of every sexual assault case committed for trial following criticism from judges. ABC News, 7 March. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-03-07/nsw-sexual-assault-cases-trial-review/103556852

Ellis J & Ellis N 2013. A new model for seeking meaningful redress for victims of church-related sexual assault. Current Issues in Criminal Justice 26: 32–41

Feeley MM 1973. Two models of the criminal justice system: An organizational perspective. Law & Society Review 7: 407–425

Forsyth M & Braithwaite V 2020. From reintegrative shaming to restorative institutional hybridity. International Journal of Restorative Justice 3:10–22

Gang D, Loff B, Naylor B & Kirkman M 2021. A call for evaluation of restorative justice programs. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 22: 186–190

Gavey N 2018. Just sex? The cultural scaffolding of rape. Routledge

Gavin P, Kite C, Porter C, McCartan K & Cawley P 2024. Restorative justice in cases of sexual violence: Current and future directions in the UK. Contemporary Justice Review 26: 393–410

Gavrielides T 2007. Restorative justice theory and practice: Addressing the discrepancy. European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control

Gilbert B 2025. Attrition of sexual assaults from the New South Wales criminal justice system. NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research

Gilmore RW 2022. Abolition geography: Essays towards liberation. Verso Books

Government of Canada 2021. Compendium of promising practices to reduce violence and increase safety of Aboriginal women in Canada – Compendium annex: Detailed practice descriptionshttps://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/cj-jp/fv-vf/annex-annexe/p132.html

Gregoire P & Nedim U 2019. The Ellis Defence: How the Church avoided paying child sexual abuse victims. Sydney Criminal Lawyers. https://nswcourts.com.au/articles/the-ellis-defence-how-the-church-avoids-paying-child-sexual-abuse-victims/

Hackett S, Phillips J, Masson H & Balfe M 2013. Individual, family and abuse characteristics of 700 British child and adolescent sexual abusers. Child Abuse Review 22: 232–245

Hamby SL & Koss MP 2003. Shades of gray: A qualitative study of terms used in the measurement of sexual victimization. Psychology of Women Quarterly 27: 243–255

Harris M & Fallot R (eds) 2001. Using trauma theory to design service systemsJossey Bass

Hearn J, Andersson K & Cowburn M 2007. Guidelines for researchers on doing research with perpetrators of sexual violence. Linköpings universitet

Hoerr K 2025. No systemic issues in sexual assault prosecutions: NSW ODPP. LSJ Online. 26 February. https://lsj.com.au/articles/no-systemic-issues-in-sexual-assault-prosecutions-nsw-odpp/

Holder R 2015. Satisfied? Exploring victims justice judgments. In D Wilson & S Ross (eds), Crime, victims and policy: International contexts, local experiences. Palgrave Macmillan: 184–213

Homes A & Grandison G 2021. Trauma-informed practice: A toolkit for Scotland. Scottish Government

Hope J & Northam H 2023. Growing a restorative community in Canberra, Australia. International Journal of Restorative Justice 6: 127–133

Hudson B 2006. Beyond white mans justice: Race, gender and justice in late modernity. Theoretical Criminology 10: 29–47

Iliadis M & Braun K 2021. Sexual assault victims can easily be re-traumatised going to court — Heres one way to stop this. The Conversationhttps://theconversation.com/sexual-assault-victims-can-easily-be-re-traumatised-going-to-court-heres-one-way-to-stop-this-157428

Jeffries S, Wood W & Russell T 2021. Adult restorative justice and gendered violence: Practitioner and service provider viewpoints from Queensland, Australia. Laws 10(1): 13

Joyce-Wojtas N & Keenan M 2016. Is restorative justice for sexual crime compatible with various criminal justice systems? Contemporary Justice Review 19: 43–68

Jülich S, Brady-Clark M, Yeung P & Landon F 2024. Restorative justice responses to sexual violence: Perspectives and experiences of participating persons responsible and persons harmed. Victims & Offenders 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2024.2333311

Jülich S, Buttle J, Cummins C & Freeborn E 2010. Project Restore: An exploratory study of restorative justice and sexual violence. AUT University

Jülich S & Landon F 2011. Specialist services for restorative justice. Auckland: Project Restore

Jülich S, Molineaux J & Green M 2020. The strategic use of terminology in restorative justice for persons harmed by sexual violence. International Journal of Restorative Justice 3: 215–234

Jülich S & Thorburn N 2017. Sexual violence and substantive equality: Can restorative justice deliver? Journal of Human Rights and Social Work 2: 34–44

Kale N 2025. Three women speak: The trauma, humiliation and shame of being a victim-survivor in the court system. The Guardian, 2 February. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/ng-interactive/2025/feb/02/three-women-speak-the-trauma-humiliation-and-shame-of-being-a-victim-survivor-in-the-court-system-ntwnfb

Karp DR, Shackford-Bradley J, Wilson RJ & Williamsen KM 2016. Campus PRISM: A report on promoting restorative initiatives for sexual misconduct on college campuses. Skidmore College Project on Restorative Justice. https://digital.sandiego.edu/soles-faculty/36/

Keenan M & Zinsstag E 2022. Sexual violence and restorative justice: Addressing the justice gap. Oxford University Press

Keenan M, Zinsstag E & O’Nolan C 2016. Sexual violence and restorative practices in Belgium, Ireland and Norway: A thematic analysis of country variations. Restorative Justice 4: 86–114

Kelly L 2013. Surviving sexual violence. John Wiley & Sons

Kim M 2024. Non-law enforcement restorative justice addressing domestic and sexual violence: Implementation Period 1 evaluation report. https://chatproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/0806_CHAT_Design_FullReport_02.pdf

Kim M 2020. Anti-carceral feminism: The contradictions of progress and the possibilities of counter-hegemonic struggle. Affilia 35: 309–326

Koss M 2014. The RESTORE Program of restorative justice for sex crimes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 29: 1623–1660

KPMG & RMIT Centre for Innovative Justice 2023. ‘This is my story. It’s your case, but it’s my story’. Exploring justice system experiences of complainants in sexual offence matters. New South Wales Department of Communities and Justice

Lajeunesse T 1996. Evaluation of Community Holistic Circle Healing. Hollow Water First Nation:Final report. Ministry of the Solicitor General. https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/cst-bnft-hllw-wtr/index-en.aspx#summary

Lawler S 2025. Safety and accountability: Stakeholder referrals to restorative justice for domestic, family and sexual violence. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 707. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti77727

Lawler S, Boxall H & Dowling C 2025. Restorative justice conferencing for domestic and family violence and sexual violence: Evaluation of Phase Three of the ACT Restorative Justice Scheme. Research Report no. 33. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/rr77680

Lewis R, Dobash R & Cavanagh K 2001. Lawprogressive potential: The value of engagement with the law for domestic violence. Social & Legal Studies 10: 105–130

Lewis T & Stauffer C (eds) 2021. Listening to the movement: Essays on new growth and new challenges in RJ. Cascade Books

Llewellyn J, MacIsaac J & MacKay M 2015. Report from the restorative justice process at the Dalhousie University Faculty of Dentistry. Dalhousie University

Mannozzi G 2019. The emergence of the idea of a restorative city and its link to restorative justice. International Journal of Restorative Justice 2: 288–292

Marchetti E & Daly K 2007. Indigenous sentencing courts: Towards a theoretical and jurisprudential model. Sydney Law Review 29: 415–443

Marsh F & Wager N 2015. Restorative justice in cases of sexual violence: Exploring the views of the public and survivors. Probation Journal 62: 336–356

Marshall T 1999. Restorative justice: An overview. United Kingdom: Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate

Mayeux S 2018. The idea of the criminal justice systemAmerican Journal of Criminal Law 45: 55–94

McAnallen A & McGinnis E 2021. Trauma-informed practice and the criminal justice system: A systematic narrative review. Irish Probation Journal 18: 109–129

McGlynn C & Westmarland N 2019. Kaleidoscopic justice: Sexual violence and victim-survivors perceptions of justice. Social & Legal Studies 28: 179–201

McGlynn C, Westmarland N & Godden N 2012. just wanted him to hear me: Sexual violence and the possibilities of restorative justice. Journal of Law and Society 39: 213–240

Mercer N, Ey LA, Vallury K & Dunk-West P 2022. Responding to sexual violence in higher education: Examining the role of restorative and transformative justice. Violence Against Women 28: 3617–3640

Moore A, Keenan M, Moss R & Scotland A 2021. Survivors’ voices: National consultation. Thriving Survivors

Moreland A & Ressler K 2021. A perspective for understanding trauma and the criminal juvenile justice system: Using a trauma-informed lens for meaningful and sustained change. Harvard Review of Psychiatry 29: 216–224

Nancarrow H 2019. Unintended consequences of domestic violence law: Gendered aspirations and racialised realities. Springer Nature

O’Nolan C, Zinsstag E & Keenan M 2018. Researching under the radar practices: Exploring restorative practices in sexual violence cases. Temida 21: 107–129

Pali B & Madsen K 2011. Dangerous liaisons? A feminist and restorative approach to sexual assault. Temida 14: 49–65

Paterson B 2014. Mainstreaming trauma. Paper presented at the Psychological Trauma-Informed Care Conference, Stirling University, Stirling, 4 June

Price S, Prenzler T, Rayment-McHugh S & McKillop N 2025. A review of RJ programmes for First Nations Peoples in Queensland. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 49(1): 1–15

Pycroft A & Christen-Schneider C 2021. An exploration of trauma-informed practices in RJ: A phenomenological study. International Journal of Restorative Justice 2021(2): 229–252

Quilter J & McNamara L 2023. Experience of complainants of adult sexual offences in the District Court of NSW: A trial transcript analysisNSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research

Read T & Straker C 2019. Brighton and Hove: Developing a culture of doing with as prevention rather than cure. International Journal of Restorative Justice 2019(2): 293–297

RMIT Centre for Innovative Justice 2021. Submission to the Victorian Law Reform Commission’s Inquiry into improving the response of the justice system to sexual offences. https://cij.org.au/cms/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/cij-submission-to-vlrc-january-2021.pdf

RMIT Centre for Innovative Justice 2014. Innovative justice responses to sexual offending – Pathways to better outcomes for victims, offenders and the community. https://cij.org.au/cms/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/innovative-justice-responses-to-sexual-offending.pdf

Rossner M 2023. Restorative justice in the twenty-first century: Making emotions mainstream. In A Liebling, S Maruna & L McAra L (eds), The Oxford handbook of criminology. Oxford University Press: 725–746

Rossner M et al. 2024. Adult RJ conferencing in Queensland: Research on best practice and expansion. Report prepared for the Queensland Department of Justice and Attorney-General. Australian National University. https://polis.cass.anu.edu.au/research/publications/adult-restorative-justice-conferencing-queensland-research-best-practice-and

Rossner M & Forsyth M 2021. Is now the time for RJ for survivors of sexual assault? International Journal of Restorative Justice 2021(3): 365–373

Rossner M & Taylor H 2024. The transformative potential of RJ: What the mainstream can learn from the margins. Annual Review of Criminology 7: 357–381

Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide 2022. Defence Abuse Response Taskforce: Final report. Canberra: Australian Government. https://defenceveteransuicide.royalcommission.gov.au/publications/exhibit-16-0115-exp000300130053-defence-abuse-response-taskforce-final-report

Rumble G, McKean M & Pearce D 2012. Report of the review of allegations of sexual and other abuse in Defence. DLA Piper review. https://www.aph.gov.au/~/media/wopapub/senate/committee/fadt_ctte/completed_inquiries/2010-13/dla_piper/report/report.ashx

Sasson S & Paul L 2014. Labeling acts of sexual violence: What roles do assault characteristics, attitudes, and life experiences play? Behavior and Social Issues 23: 35–49

Saywood J 2019. Whanganui: Respectful relationships at the heart of our city A story from New Zealand. International Journal of Restorative Justice 2: 320–324

Scottish Government 2023. Roadmap for creating trauma-informed and responsive change: Guidance for organisations, systems and workforces in Scotland. https://www.traumatransformation.scot/implementation/

Sherman LW et al. 2015. Twelve experiments in restorative justice: The Jerry Lee program of randomized trials of restorative justice conferences. Journal of Experimental Criminology 11: 501–540

Strang H 2020. Crime, shame and reintegration: From theory to empirical evidence. International Journal of Restorative Justice 2020(3): 23–29

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 2014. SAMHSA’s concept of trauma and guidance for a trauma-Informed approach. https://www.health.ny.gov/health_care/medicaid/program/medicaid_health_homes/docs/samhsa_trauma_concept_paper.pdf

Tauri JM 2022. What exactly are you restoring us to? A critical examination of Indigenous experiences of state‐centred restorative justice. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice 61(1): 53–67

Tubex H, Bartels L, Curtis A, Culbong H and Tufuga E 2026. Stories that matter: Learning from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people’s experiences of the criminal legal systemResearch Report no. 36. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/rr78137

Van Cleynenbreugel L 2019. Leuven: Creating support and skills for handling conflicts in a restorative way. International Journal of Restorative Justice 2019(2): 303–308

Victorian Law Reform Commission 2021. Improving the justice system response to sexual offences: Report. https://www.lawreform.vic.gov.au/project/improving-the-response-of-the-justice-system-to-sexual-offences/