This report presents the findings from the first Australian study to explore how problems with the access to and use of sexual assault victims’ private information—such as counselling or medical records, digital communications or information related to prior sexual experiences— arise in criminal prosecution processes. The study considers what legislative provisions exist to prevent or limit the disclosure of victims’ private records in criminal prosecution processes, and whether and how victims’ private records could be better safeguarded, including through independent legal representation (ILR). The project also considers how ILR might impact sexual assault victims’ experiences of procedural fairness and substantive outcomes. The report is informed by a nationwide survey of 145 sexual assault victims, interviews and a focus group with 24 practitioners and stakeholders supporting victims, and an analysis of 14 pre trial hearings from Queensland and New South Wales where applications to the court sought to access victims’ confidential communications and question victims about them.
The project uncovers problems with the routine access to and use of victims’ private records in criminal prosecutions as a basis to undermine and challenge victim credibility. It generates insight into why and how victims’ private records are being sought, disclosed and used against them and the resultant effects on victims’ retraumatisation, procedural experiences, reluctance to seek counselling support, and recovery and healing. The project reveals how trauma informed ILR can better protect and empower victims who engage in criminal prosecution processes.
Note on content
This report contains victims’ accounts of sexual assault and suicidal ideation as well as discussion of historical child sexual abuse.
Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Acronyms and abbreviations
- Abstract
- Note on content
- Executive summary
- Key findings
- Key recommendations
- Introductioin
- Terminology
- Literature review
- Victims in criminal prosecution processes
- Private records
- Independent legal representation for victims
- Aims and methodology
- Research approach
- Survey instrument and recruitment
- Interviews and focus group
- Analysis of pre-trial documents
- Findings
- Survey findings
- Interview and focus group findings
- Analysis of pre-trial documents
- Discussion
- Myths and stereotypes
- The impacts on victims of the use of their private information
- How independent legal representation can enhance victims' procedural experiences
- Conclusion
- Limitations
- References
References
URLs correct as at September 2025
Aahlmann-Eltze C & Patil I 2021. Ggsignif: R package for displaying significance brackets for ‘ggplot2’. PsyArxiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7awm6
Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) 2025. Safe, informed, supported: Reforming justice responses to sexual violence. ALRC report no. 143. https://www.alrc.gov.au/publication/jrsv-report-143/
Australian Law Reform Commission 2024. Justice responses to sexual violence. Issues paper 49. https://www.alrc.gov.au/publication/jrsv-issues-paper-2024/
Babbie E 2010. The practice of social research, 12th ed. Wadsworth
Braun K 2019. Victim participation rights: Variation across criminal justice systems. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan
Braun V and Clarke V 2022. Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology 9(1): 3–26
Burgin R & Flynn A 2019. Women’s behaviours as implied consent: Male ‘reasonableness’ in Australian rape law. Criminology & Criminal Justice 21(3): 334–352
Burman M & Brindley S 2021. Challenges in the investigation and prosecution of rape and serious sexual offences in Scotland. In R Killean, E Dowds & A McAlinden (eds), Sexual violence on trial: Local and comparative perspectives. Routledge studies in crime and society. Abingdon: Routledge: 199–211. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429356087-21
Cowan S 2023. Mind the gap: Implementing ‘rape shield’ laws in Scottish sexual offences trials. New directions in sexual violence scholarship. Taylor and Francis: 151–172
Crosschild C, Huynh N, De Sousa I, Bawafaa E & Brown H 2021. Where is critical analysis of power and positionality in knowledge translation? Health Research Policy and Systems 19(92): 1–9
de Aquino Ferreira LF, Queiroz Pereira FH, Neri Benevides AML & Aguiar Melo MC 2018. Borderline personality disorder and sexual abuse: A systematic review. Psychiatry Research 262: 70–77
Department of Social Services 2022. National Plan to End Violence against Women and Children 2022–2032. https://www.dss.gov.au/national-plan-end-gender-based-violence
Doak J 2005. Victims’ rights in criminal trials: Prospects for participation. Journal of Law and Society 32(2): 294–316
Eastwood C & Patton W 2002. The experiences of child complainants of sexual abuse in the criminal justice system. Canberra: Criminology Research Council. https://www.aic.gov.au/crg/reports/crg-2398-9
Epstein D & Goodman LA 2019. Discounting women: Doubting domestic violence survivors’ credibility and dismissing their experiences. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 16: 399–461
Fisher RP, Powell MB & Dawson HR 2021. Inconsistency, omissions, and confidence as indicators of the accuracy of sexual assault victims’ recollections. In N Deslauriers-Varin & C Bennell (eds), Criminal investigations of sexual offenses: Techniques and challenges. Springer International Publishing: 133–145
Hulme E 2021. The sexual assault communications privilege: Review of legislation, case law and practical guidance on seeking SACP material. Legal Aid NSW
Hunter R 2019. Feminist approaches to socio-legal studies. In N Creutzfeldt, M Mason & K McConnachie (eds), Routledge handbook of socio-legal theory and methods. London: Routledge
Iliadis M 2020. Adversarial justice and victims' rights: reconceptualising the role of sexual assault victims. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429261367
Iliadis M 2019. Victim representation for sexual history evidence in Ireland: A step towards or away from meeting victims' procedural justice needs? Criminology & Criminal Justice 20(4): 416–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895819851848
Iliadis M, Fitz-Gibbon K & Walklate S 2021. Improving justice responses for victims of intimate partner violence: Examining the merits of the provision of independent legal representation. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 45(1): 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2019.1695639
Iliadis M & Flynn A 2018. Providing a check on prosecutorial decision-making: An analysis of the victims’ right to review reform. British Journal of Criminology 58(3): 550–568. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azx036
Iliadis M, Smith O & Doak J 2021. Independent legal representation for rape complainants: Lessons from Northern Ireland. Journal of Law and Society 48(2): 250–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12295
Jackson J, Doak J, Saunders C, Wright D & Cooper D 2024. Mapping the changing face of cross-examination in criminal trials. https://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/project/changing-face-of-cross-examination-in-criminal-trials
Kassambara A 2023. Rstatix: Pipe-friendly framework for basic statistical tests [R package version 0.7.2]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rstatix
King N, Horrocks C & Brooks J 2019. Interviews in qualitative research. London: Sage
Levit N, Verchick RRM & Minow M 2016. Feminist legal theory: A primer, 2nd edition. New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479840403.001.0001
Manikis M & Iliadis M 2022. Victim right to review schemes in Australia: Debates and consequences. In S Walklate & P Cox (eds), Victims’ access to justice: Historical and contemporary perspectives. London: Routledge: 138–156
Mann HB & Whitney DR 1947. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 18(1): 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177730491
McGlynn C 2017. Rape trials and sexual history evidence: Reforming the law on third-party evidence. Journal of Criminal Law 81(5): 367–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022018317728824
Nagar PM, Caivano O & Talwar V 2020. The role of empathy in children’s costly prosocial lie‐telling behaviour. Infant and Child Development 29(4): e2179. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2179
O’Connor C & Joffe H 2020. Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
O’Shea B, Feicht R, Brown M & Numer M 2024. Rethinking sexual violence labels: Exploring the impact of ‘victim’ and ‘survivor’ discourse. European Journal of Psychotraumatology 15(1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2023.2296329
Patil I 2021. Visualizations with statistical details: The ‘ggstatsplot’ approach. Journal of Open Source Software 6(61)
Proudfoot K 2022. Inductive/deductive hybrid thematic analysis in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 7(3): 308–326
Quilter J & McNamara L 2023. Experience of complainants of adult sexual offences in the District Court of NSW: A trial transcript analysis. Crime and Justice Bulletin no. 259. Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research. https://bocsar.nsw.gov.au/research-evaluations/2023/cjb259-summary-transcript-analysis-of-nsw-sexual-offences-trial.html
R Core Team 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.r-project.org/
RStudio Team 2020. RStudio: Integrated development for R. RStudio. http://www.rstudio.com/
Sjoberg D, Whiting K, Curry M, Lavery J & Larmarange J 2021. Reproducible summary tables with the gtsummary Package. The R Journal 13: 570–580. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2021-053
Smith O & Daly E 2020. Evaluation of the Sexual Violence Complainants’ Advocate scheme. Loughborough University. https://needisclear.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/svca-evaluation-final-report-1.pdf
Tomczak M & Tomczak-Łukaszewska E 2014. The need to report effect size estimates revisited: An overview of some recommended measures of effect size. Trends in Sport Sciences 21(1): 19–25
van Hulst M, Metze T, Dewulf A, de Vries J, Van Bommel S & van Ostaijen M 2024. Discourse, framing and narrative: Three ways of doing critical, interpretive policy analysis. Critical Policy Studies 19(1): 74–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2024.2326936
Victims of Crime Commissioner (VoCC) 2023. Silenced and sidelined: Systemic inquiry into victim participation in the justice system. https://victimsofcrimecommissioner.vic.gov.au/recent-activity/previous-inquiries
Victorian Law Reform Commission (VLRC) 2021. Improving the responses of the justice system to sexual offences. https://www.lawreform.vic.gov.au/project/improving-the-response-of-the-justice-system-to-sexual-offences/
Victorian Law Reform Commission 2016. The role of victims of crime in the criminal trial process. https://www.lawreform.vic.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/VLRC_Victims-Of-Crime-Report-W.pdf
West R 2019. Introduction to the Research handbook on feminist jurisprudence. In R West & CG Bowman (eds), Research handbook on feminist jurisprudence. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786439697.00007
Wickham H 2016. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag
Wilcoxon F 1945. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin 1(6): 80–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001968
Women's Safety and Justice Taskforce (WSJT) 2022. Hear her voice: Women and girls' experiences across the criminal justice system. Report 2, Volume 1. https://www.publications.qld.gov.au/dataset/womens-safety-and-justice-taskforce